基于Crown指标的国际研究前沿的评价——4个聚集水平上的实证研究
|
摘要
[目的/意义]探讨适合于研究前沿评价的指标,可以丰富研究前沿领域的研究内容,为该领域的研究者提供参考。[方法/过程]基于Crown的两个指标CPP/FCSm指标和MNCS指标对国际SCI和SSCI的8个研究领域中的研究前沿在4个聚集水平上进行了探索评价。[结果/结论]结果表明,总被引次数属于评价指标中相对较弱的指标,CPP/FCSm和MNCS这两个指标与CPT基准指标在4个聚集水平之间的相关性非常强,证明了这两个指标在研究前沿的实际评价过程中具有较好的效果。由此可以基于CPP/FCSm和MNCS指标针对目标领域的研究前沿在4个不同的水平上进行评价研究。
[Purpose/Significance]Exploring indicators suitable for research frontiers evaluation could enrich the research content of research frontier areas and provide reference for researchers in this field.[Method/Process]Based on CPP/FCSm and MNCS indicators, this paper explored and evaluated the research frontiers in 8 research areas of international SCI and SSCI at four aggregation levels.[Result/Conclusion]The results showed that the number of citations was a relatively weak index in the evaluation indexes, and the correlations between CPP/FCSm index, MCNS and the benchmark CPT index were very strong at four aggregation levels, which proved that CPP/FCSm index and MCNS indicators had good effects in the practical evaluation of research frontiers. Then, the research frontiers in the target field could be evaluated at four different levels based on CPP/FCSm index and MCNS index.
[Purpose/Significance]Exploring indicators suitable for research frontiers evaluation could enrich the research content of research frontier areas and provide reference for researchers in this field.[Method/Process]Based on CPP/FCSm and MNCS indicators, this paper explored and evaluated the research frontiers in 8 research areas of international SCI and SSCI at four aggregation levels.[Result/Conclusion]The results showed that the number of citations was a relatively weak index in the evaluation indexes, and the correlations between CPP/FCSm index, MCNS and the benchmark CPT index were very strong at four aggregation levels, which proved that CPP/FCSm index and MCNS indicators had good effects in the practical evaluation of research frontiers. Then, the research frontiers in the target field could be evaluated at four different levels based on CPP/FCSm index and MCNS index.
引文
[1] Huang,Mu-hsuan,Chang,Chia-Pin.A comparative study on detecting research fronts in the organic light-emitting diode (OLED) field using bibliographic coupling and co-citation[J].Scientometrics,2015,102(3):2041-2057.
[2] Edgar Schiebel.Visualization of research fronts and knowledge bases by three-dimensional areal densities of bibliographically coupled publications and co-citations[J].Scientometrics,2012,91(2):557-566.
[3] Jordan A Comins,Loet Leydesdorff.RPYS i/o:Software demonstration of a web-based tool for the historiography and visualization of citation classics,sleeping beauties and research fronts[J].Scientometrics,2016,107(3):1509-1517.
[4] 崔宇红,王飒,高晓巍,等.基于全域微观模型的研究前沿主题探测和特征分析[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(15):75-82.
[5] 刘自强,许海云,岳丽欣,等.面向研究前沿预测的主题扩散演化滞后效应研究[J].情报学报,2018,37(10):979-988.
[6] 杜建,孙轶楠,李永洁,等.从科学——技术交叉处识别创新前沿:方法与实证[J/OL].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1762.G3.20180830.1734.006.html.
[7] 张庆芝,白如江,王效岳.规划文本和论文数据对比视域下细主题粒度科学研究前沿识别研究——以碳纳米管研究领域为例[J].情报理论与实践,2018,41(11):117-122,106.
[8] Gisela Cantos-Mateos,Maria-Angeles Zulueta,Benjamin Vargas-Quesada.Development of spanish research on stem cells visualization and identification of the main research fronts[J].Profesional De La Informacion,2014,23(3):259-271.
[9] Vincent C Ma,John S Liu.Exploring the research fronts and main paths of literature:A case study of shareholder activism research[J].Scientometrics,2016,109(1):33-52.
[10] 赵蓉英,许丽敏.文献计量学发展演进与研究前沿的知识图谱探析[J].中国图书馆学报,2010,36(5):60-68.
[11] 邱均平,温芳芳.近五年来图书情报学研究热点与前沿的可视化分析——基于13种高影响力外文源刊的计量研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2011,37(2):51-60.
[12] 赵海平,邓胜利.不同情境下的信息行为研究——从ISIC 2016、ASIS&T 2016、iConference2017会议看信息行为研究前沿[J].情报资料工作,2018(6):52-59.
[13] 张敏,刘盈,张艳.信息偶遇行为研究的知识脉络与前沿展望[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(18):129-139.
[14] 张敏,刘雪瑞,张艳.在线健康信息求助行为实证研究的系统综述:知识体系、影响因素与前沿分析[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(15):122-131.
[15] 范少萍,安新颖,晏归来,等.医学领域前沿主题识别方法研究[J].情报学报,2018,37(7):686-694.
[16] 姚艳玲.2017年国际人工智能领域研究前沿的分析与研究[J].计算机科学,2018,45(9):1-10.
[17] 王康,王晓慧.国内数据安全研究热点与前沿分析[J].新世纪图书馆,2018(9):88-91.
[18] Clarivate.Web of Science在线大讲堂[DB/OL].https://clarivate.com.cn/e-clarivate/wos_research_0926.htm,2018-12-01.
[19] Bornmann Lutz,de Moya Anegon Felix,Leydesdorff Loet.Do scientific advancements lean on the shoulders of giants?a bibliometric investigation of the ortega hypothesis[J].Plos One,2010,5(10):1-6.
[20] 姜春林,刘学,张立伟.中文高被引期刊论文的参考文献也倾向于高被引吗?——以图书情报学为例[J].情报杂志,2015,34(1):105-109.
[21] Hui Zhen Fu,Yuh Shan Ho.Collaborative characteristics and networks of national,institutional and individual contributors using highly cited articles in environmental engineering in science citation index expanded[J].Current Science,2018,115(3):410-421.
[22] Ludo Waltman,Nees Jan van Eck,Thed N van Leeuwen.Towards a new crown indicator:An empirical analysis[J].Scientometrics,2011,87(3):467-481.
[23] Vincent Lariviere,Gingras Y.Averages of ratios vs.ratios of averages:An empirical analysis of four levels of aggregation[J].Journal of Informetrics,2011,5(3):392-399.
[24] Ruth Fairclough,Mike Thelwall.More precise methods for national research citation impact comparisons[J].Journal of Informetrics,2015,9(4):895-906.
[25] Chih-Chung Chang,Chih-Jen Lin.Libsvm:A library for support vector machines[J].ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology,2011,2(3):1-27.
[26] Castro Neto A H,Guinea F,Novoselov K S.The electronic properties of graphene[J].Reviews of Modern Physics,2009,81(1):109-162.
[27] Hasan M Z,Kane C L.Colloquium:Topological insulators[J].Reviews of Modern Physics,2010,82(4):3045-3067.
[2] Edgar Schiebel.Visualization of research fronts and knowledge bases by three-dimensional areal densities of bibliographically coupled publications and co-citations[J].Scientometrics,2012,91(2):557-566.
[3] Jordan A Comins,Loet Leydesdorff.RPYS i/o:Software demonstration of a web-based tool for the historiography and visualization of citation classics,sleeping beauties and research fronts[J].Scientometrics,2016,107(3):1509-1517.
[4] 崔宇红,王飒,高晓巍,等.基于全域微观模型的研究前沿主题探测和特征分析[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(15):75-82.
[5] 刘自强,许海云,岳丽欣,等.面向研究前沿预测的主题扩散演化滞后效应研究[J].情报学报,2018,37(10):979-988.
[6] 杜建,孙轶楠,李永洁,等.从科学——技术交叉处识别创新前沿:方法与实证[J/OL].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1762.G3.20180830.1734.006.html.
[7] 张庆芝,白如江,王效岳.规划文本和论文数据对比视域下细主题粒度科学研究前沿识别研究——以碳纳米管研究领域为例[J].情报理论与实践,2018,41(11):117-122,106.
[8] Gisela Cantos-Mateos,Maria-Angeles Zulueta,Benjamin Vargas-Quesada.Development of spanish research on stem cells visualization and identification of the main research fronts[J].Profesional De La Informacion,2014,23(3):259-271.
[9] Vincent C Ma,John S Liu.Exploring the research fronts and main paths of literature:A case study of shareholder activism research[J].Scientometrics,2016,109(1):33-52.
[10] 赵蓉英,许丽敏.文献计量学发展演进与研究前沿的知识图谱探析[J].中国图书馆学报,2010,36(5):60-68.
[11] 邱均平,温芳芳.近五年来图书情报学研究热点与前沿的可视化分析——基于13种高影响力外文源刊的计量研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2011,37(2):51-60.
[12] 赵海平,邓胜利.不同情境下的信息行为研究——从ISIC 2016、ASIS&T 2016、iConference2017会议看信息行为研究前沿[J].情报资料工作,2018(6):52-59.
[13] 张敏,刘盈,张艳.信息偶遇行为研究的知识脉络与前沿展望[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(18):129-139.
[14] 张敏,刘雪瑞,张艳.在线健康信息求助行为实证研究的系统综述:知识体系、影响因素与前沿分析[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(15):122-131.
[15] 范少萍,安新颖,晏归来,等.医学领域前沿主题识别方法研究[J].情报学报,2018,37(7):686-694.
[16] 姚艳玲.2017年国际人工智能领域研究前沿的分析与研究[J].计算机科学,2018,45(9):1-10.
[17] 王康,王晓慧.国内数据安全研究热点与前沿分析[J].新世纪图书馆,2018(9):88-91.
[18] Clarivate.Web of Science在线大讲堂[DB/OL].https://clarivate.com.cn/e-clarivate/wos_research_0926.htm,2018-12-01.
[19] Bornmann Lutz,de Moya Anegon Felix,Leydesdorff Loet.Do scientific advancements lean on the shoulders of giants?a bibliometric investigation of the ortega hypothesis[J].Plos One,2010,5(10):1-6.
[20] 姜春林,刘学,张立伟.中文高被引期刊论文的参考文献也倾向于高被引吗?——以图书情报学为例[J].情报杂志,2015,34(1):105-109.
[21] Hui Zhen Fu,Yuh Shan Ho.Collaborative characteristics and networks of national,institutional and individual contributors using highly cited articles in environmental engineering in science citation index expanded[J].Current Science,2018,115(3):410-421.
[22] Ludo Waltman,Nees Jan van Eck,Thed N van Leeuwen.Towards a new crown indicator:An empirical analysis[J].Scientometrics,2011,87(3):467-481.
[23] Vincent Lariviere,Gingras Y.Averages of ratios vs.ratios of averages:An empirical analysis of four levels of aggregation[J].Journal of Informetrics,2011,5(3):392-399.
[24] Ruth Fairclough,Mike Thelwall.More precise methods for national research citation impact comparisons[J].Journal of Informetrics,2015,9(4):895-906.
[25] Chih-Chung Chang,Chih-Jen Lin.Libsvm:A library for support vector machines[J].ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology,2011,2(3):1-27.
[26] Castro Neto A H,Guinea F,Novoselov K S.The electronic properties of graphene[J].Reviews of Modern Physics,2009,81(1):109-162.
[27] Hasan M Z,Kane C L.Colloquium:Topological insulators[J].Reviews of Modern Physics,2010,82(4):3045-3067.