摘要
本文对"创客实验室"项目的评估报告进行分析、梳理和总结,在此基础上,提出我国公共图书馆的创客空间评估应以用户为中心、注重效率效果和价值的创造,进行差异化调查并密切联系当地政府部门及其他机构丰富创客空间活动,从而出具客观反映创客空间活动并能指出其缺点不足的评估报告。
This article analyzes the evaluation report of Makerlab.The conclusions include that the evaluation of makerspace project should be user-certered and pay attention to the actual result and value innovation.The makerspace's evaluation report should also strengthen survey differences and cooperate with the government or other departments to increase the activities ' diversity.Last but not least,the evaluation report should be objective and point out the shortcomings as well as amendments.
引文
[1](印)阮冈纳赞.图书馆学五定律[M].夏云,等,译.北京:书目文献出版社,1988.
[2]王丽平,李忠华.高校创客文化的发展模式及培育路径[J].江苏高教,2016,2(01):94-97.
[3]陶蕾.创客空间---创客运动下的图书馆新模式及规划研究[J].现代情报,2014,(02):52-58.
[4]Mc Cue,T.J.(2011),“First public library to create a maker space”,Forbes,available at:www.forbes.com/sites/tjmccue/2011/11/15/first-public-library-to-create-a-maker-space/#3d60659f80da(accessed 20 March 2016).
[5]黄晓军.图书馆创客空间成功构建的关键因素分析[J].图书与情报,2016,(02):62-65.
[6]The Narva City Development Plan of 26.06.2007,City Council Decision 36.Last updated by City Council Decision No.22on 26.09.2013.
[7]邱进友.众创空间:图书馆未来空间设置的方向[J].图书与情报,2015,(05):78-80.
[8]Maria Lille,(2016),“Evaluating the success of markerspace in a public library The case of Narva City Library MakerLab in Estonia”[J].New Library World,Vol.117 Iss 9/10,587-595.
[9]邱建恒.美国公共图书馆星级评价系统之研究[J].山东图书馆学刊,2016,(01):55-58.
[10]吴志轩.台湾生态农业的社区营造[N].中国青年报,2014-07-25.
[11]Laura Fleming,A Maker Culture[J].Principal,March.2016,(04):16-19.
[12]刘丽敏,王晴.国外图书馆创客空间研究及实践进展[J].图书馆论坛,2016,(07):115-123.