词汇新构式创生概念化和再概念化路径研究
|
摘要
本文试图在整合认知语言学和构式语法相关理论思想的基础上,详细描述和揭示新构式在寻求语言形式和意义之"非规约化"匹配过程中所关涉的概念化和再概念化路径。研究重点在于:1)揭示旧词汇构式之形式与新意义"非规约性"匹配的概念化和再概念化路径;2)揭示派生词新构式之形式与意义"非规约性"匹配的概念化和再概念化路径;3)揭示复合词新构式之形式与意义"非规约性"匹配的概念化和再概念化路径。
Based on a framework integrating related ideas between cognitive linguistics and construction grammar, this paper attempts to discover and elaborate on the conceptualization and reconceptualization paths of the establishment of unconventional pairing between form-meaning. The main focus of this paper is to discover and elaborate on the conceptualization and reconceptualization paths of the establishment of unconventional pairing between existing constructions and new meanings, as well as the establishment of unconventional pairing of derivational constructions and compound constructions.
Based on a framework integrating related ideas between cognitive linguistics and construction grammar, this paper attempts to discover and elaborate on the conceptualization and reconceptualization paths of the establishment of unconventional pairing between form-meaning. The main focus of this paper is to discover and elaborate on the conceptualization and reconceptualization paths of the establishment of unconventional pairing between existing constructions and new meanings, as well as the establishment of unconventional pairing of derivational constructions and compound constructions.
引文
Barcelona, A. 2008. “The interaction of metonymy and metaphor in the meaning and form of ‘bahuvrihi’ compounds”. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 6. pp208-281.
Booij, G. 2010. Construction Morphology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Burfoot A. “The truth about Pheidippides and the early years of Marathon history”. https: //www.runnersworld.com/training/a20814347/oct-26-the-truth-about-pheidippides- and-the-early-years-of-marathon-history/(June-24-2016).
Croft, W. & D. A. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Evans, V. & M. Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Fauconnier, G. 1994. Mental Spaces. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mapping in Language and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Goldberg, A. E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hopper, P. J. & E. C. Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jiyoung Y. 2011. “Productivity of spanish verb-noun compounds: patterns of metonymy and metaphor”. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9. pp83-106.
Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kovecses, Z. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, G. 1993. “The contemporary theory of metaphor”. In A. Ortony (ed.). Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. 2004. Don't Think of an Elephant! White River Junction VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites (Vol. 1). California: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. 2007. Ten Lectures on Cognitive Grammar. Beijing: Foreign Teaching and Research Press.
Langacker, R. W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schmid, H. J. 2008. “New words in the mind: concept-formation and entrenchment of neologisms”. Anglia-Zeitschrift Für Englische Philologie 126. pp1-36.
Traugott, E. C. & G. Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
陈敏哲、白解红,2014,单域整合网络的意义建构机制探微—以网络新词“blogebrity”和“celeblog”的意义建构为例,《外语教学》第3期: 7-10。
李雪,2012,概念隐喻、概念转喻与词汇研究,《外语学刊》第4期: 58-61。
刘娅琼,2008,从“X门”看再概念化过程—兼论修辞结构的构建手段之一,《修辞学习》第3期: 36-40。
刘志芳,2015,认知语言学视角下的网络新词—以“学X”类为考察对象,《河南师范大学学报》第2期: 168-170。
陆佳英、肖运初,2006,新词概念合成的认知语义学研究,《外语研究》第5期: 5-8。
梅·罗洛,1987,《爱与意志》,冯川译,北京: 国际文化出版公司。
秦洪庆、王红梅,2013,英语新词构成的理据研究,《教学与管理》第6期: 105-106。
王寅,2007,《认知语言学》,上海: 上海外语教育出版社。
王馥芳,2006,《认知视角下的句法变异》,北京: 外文出版社。
王馥芳,2014,《认知语言学反思性批评》,北京: 外语教学与研究出版社。
王馥芳,2015,“框架”重构实现言说创新,《中国社会科学报》(2015-10-13)。
杨彬,2008,计算机英语新词的认知语义阐释,《外语与外语教学》第3期: 24-28。
姚小平,2013,《如何学习研究语言学》,北京: 北京大学出版社。
邹嘉彦、游汝杰,2008,汉语新词与流行语的采录和界定,《语言研究》第2期: 53-61。
(1)概念整合、概念隐喻以及概念转喻在构式概念化过程中发挥重要作用,但因其为学界所熟知,此处略去不论。概念整合理论可参见Fauconnier &Turner(1994,1997,2002);概念隐喻及概念转喻理论可参见Lakoff & Johnson(1980)、Lakoff(1987)、Lakoff(1993)、Lakoff & Johnson(1999)、Kovecses(2010)等。
(2)OED在线词典对该词缀的定义为: denoting something carried on for an abnormal length of time(指某件事情持续的时间达到非正常的时长);Marriam-Webster对该词缀的定义为: event or activity lasting a long time or involving a great deal of something(持续很长一段时间或者卷入大量时间的事件或者活动)。因此,我们认为该词缀的图式意义为“与超长时间有关的”。
Booij, G. 2010. Construction Morphology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Burfoot A. “The truth about Pheidippides and the early years of Marathon history”. https: //www.runnersworld.com/training/a20814347/oct-26-the-truth-about-pheidippides- and-the-early-years-of-marathon-history/(June-24-2016).
Croft, W. & D. A. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Evans, V. & M. Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Fauconnier, G. 1994. Mental Spaces. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mapping in Language and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Goldberg, A. E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hopper, P. J. & E. C. Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jiyoung Y. 2011. “Productivity of spanish verb-noun compounds: patterns of metonymy and metaphor”. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9. pp83-106.
Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kovecses, Z. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, G. 1993. “The contemporary theory of metaphor”. In A. Ortony (ed.). Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. 2004. Don't Think of an Elephant! White River Junction VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites (Vol. 1). California: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. 2007. Ten Lectures on Cognitive Grammar. Beijing: Foreign Teaching and Research Press.
Langacker, R. W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schmid, H. J. 2008. “New words in the mind: concept-formation and entrenchment of neologisms”. Anglia-Zeitschrift Für Englische Philologie 126. pp1-36.
Traugott, E. C. & G. Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
陈敏哲、白解红,2014,单域整合网络的意义建构机制探微—以网络新词“blogebrity”和“celeblog”的意义建构为例,《外语教学》第3期: 7-10。
李雪,2012,概念隐喻、概念转喻与词汇研究,《外语学刊》第4期: 58-61。
刘娅琼,2008,从“X门”看再概念化过程—兼论修辞结构的构建手段之一,《修辞学习》第3期: 36-40。
刘志芳,2015,认知语言学视角下的网络新词—以“学X”类为考察对象,《河南师范大学学报》第2期: 168-170。
陆佳英、肖运初,2006,新词概念合成的认知语义学研究,《外语研究》第5期: 5-8。
梅·罗洛,1987,《爱与意志》,冯川译,北京: 国际文化出版公司。
秦洪庆、王红梅,2013,英语新词构成的理据研究,《教学与管理》第6期: 105-106。
王寅,2007,《认知语言学》,上海: 上海外语教育出版社。
王馥芳,2006,《认知视角下的句法变异》,北京: 外文出版社。
王馥芳,2014,《认知语言学反思性批评》,北京: 外语教学与研究出版社。
王馥芳,2015,“框架”重构实现言说创新,《中国社会科学报》(2015-10-13)。
杨彬,2008,计算机英语新词的认知语义阐释,《外语与外语教学》第3期: 24-28。
姚小平,2013,《如何学习研究语言学》,北京: 北京大学出版社。
邹嘉彦、游汝杰,2008,汉语新词与流行语的采录和界定,《语言研究》第2期: 53-61。
(1)概念整合、概念隐喻以及概念转喻在构式概念化过程中发挥重要作用,但因其为学界所熟知,此处略去不论。概念整合理论可参见Fauconnier &Turner(1994,1997,2002);概念隐喻及概念转喻理论可参见Lakoff & Johnson(1980)、Lakoff(1987)、Lakoff(1993)、Lakoff & Johnson(1999)、Kovecses(2010)等。
(2)OED在线词典对该词缀的定义为: denoting something carried on for an abnormal length of time(指某件事情持续的时间达到非正常的时长);Marriam-Webster对该词缀的定义为: event or activity lasting a long time or involving a great deal of something(持续很长一段时间或者卷入大量时间的事件或者活动)。因此,我们认为该词缀的图式意义为“与超长时间有关的”。