摘要
考试招生制度改革对教育考试执法提出了更高要求。教育考试执法不应照本宣科式地简单套用和被动适用法律,只有自觉而且恰当地运用价值判断、利益衡量,使之与"三段论"相辅相成,才能充分保障教育考试执法与法律精神相符。既服务于教育考试立法所秉持的最大限度维护社会公平正义、促进公序良俗、维护法律威严的目标,又能够充分有效保障考生的合法权益。
The reform of the system of examination and enrollment has put forward higher requirements for the law enforcement of education examination. The education examination law cannot simply apply to echo what the books say consciously and properly using the value judgment,the interests of the measure,and make the "syllogism "complement each other,law enforcement of the examination and the spirit of the law can be fully guarantced. It not only serves social justice and justice,promotes public order and good customs,but also protects the legitimate goal of law,and fully protects the legitimate rights and interests of examinees.
引文
[1]张明泉.“组织考试作弊罪全国第一案”侦办始末[N].楚天都市报,2017,3(22):4.
[2]王利明.法学方法论[M].北京:中国人民出版社,2012:560.
[3]潘丽萍.法律的道德批判与法的价值理念的发展[J].东南学术,2010,(1):107-113.
[4]休谟.人性论[M].关文运译,北京:商务印书馆,1980:505,508-509.
[5]方兴,田海平.《物权法》的道德性:从法律的功利判断到法律的价值判断[J].南京社会科学,2011,(2):101-106.
[6]任强.判决如何作出——以判决类型为视角[J].中国社会科学,2007,(3):114-125.
[7](美)N.格里高利·曼昆.经济学原理:微观经济学分册[M].梁小民,梁砾译.北京:北京大学出版社,2009:4.
[8](美)E.博登海默.法理学——法哲学及其方法[M].邓正来,姬敬武译.北京:华夏出版社,1987:151.
[9]杨素云.利益衡量:理论、标准和方法[J].学海,2011,(5):201-207.
[10]李军.利益衡量论[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,(4):90-93.
[11]赵可.浅谈利益衡量的若干基础问题[J].湖北社会科学,2009,(2):137-141.