摘要
目的对以侵入性冠状动脉造影(ICA)为金标准,研究64排螺旋CT冠状动脉成像(64-row CCTA)诊断冠状动脉狭窄的文献进行Meta分析,评价64-row CCTA对冠状动脉狭窄的临床诊断价值。方法检索Cochrane图书馆、OVID循证医学数据库、Pub Med、中国期刊网中的中、英文文献。按照Cochrane协作网推荐的诊断试验纳入标准筛选文献,提取纳入研究的特征信息。数据分析采用Rev Man 5.3统计软件,检验异质性,并根据异质性结果选择相应的效应模型。对所有研究进行加权定量合并,计算汇总敏感性(Se)、汇总特异性(Sp)及95%可信区间(CI)。绘制汇总受试者工作特征曲线(SROC),计算曲线下面积。结果共纳入69篇文献,均存在异质性,按照随机效应模型,汇总Se=0.92,95%CI=(0.91,0.92);汇总Sp=0.95,95%CI=(0.95,0.96);SROC曲线下面积为98.60%。结论 64-row CCTA诊断冠状动脉狭窄具有较高的Se和Sp,是一种高效、无创的检查方法。
Objective To assess the overall value of 64-row coronary computed tomography angiography(64-row CCTA) in diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis with invasive coronary angiography(ICA) as the gold standard. Methods A search in Cochrane Library, OVID, Pub Med and CNKI was performed to identify relevant English and Chinese language articles. Criteria for inclusion were established based on validity criteria for diagnostic research published by the Cochrane Methods Group on Screening and Diagnostic Tests.Subsequently, the characteristics of the included articles were appraised and extracted. Statistical analysis was performed employing Rev Man 5.3, Meta-Disc 1.4. Heterogeneity of the included articles was tested, which was used to select proper effect model. Pooled weighted sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic(SROC) curve was drawn and the area under the curve(AUC) was calculated. Results Of the 479 retrieved articles, 69 were included. The pooled weighted sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence interval(95% CI) were 0.92(0.91-0.92) and 0.95(0.95-0.96), respectively.The area under the SROC curve was 98.60%. Conclusions 64-row CCTA has a highly accurate sensitivity and specificity with a strong ROC curve making it an alternative non-invasive method in the diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis.
引文
[1]Cochrane Methods Group on Screening and Diagnostic Tests.Recommended methods.http://www.Cochrane.org/Cochrane/sadt.htm.
[2]Sackett DL,Straus SE,Rithardson WS,et al.Evidence-based Medicine:how to practice and teach EBM[M].2nd.London:Churchill Livingstone,2000:169-182.
[3]Sajjadieh A,Hekmatnia A,Keivani M,et al.Diagnostic performance of 64-row coronary CT angiography in detecting significant stenosis as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography[J].ARYA Atheroscler,2013,9(2):157-163.
[4]Ahmad H.The diagnostic performance of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in assessment of coronary artery disease[J].Med J Cairo Univ,2011,79(1):129-140.
[5]Maffei E,Seitun S,Nieman K,et al.Assessment of coronary artery disease and calcified coronary plaque burden by computed tomography in patients with and without diabetes mellitus[J].Eur Radiol,2011,21(5):944-953.
[6]Ziegler F,Leber AW,Becker A,et al.Detection of significant coronary artery stenosis with 64-slice computed tomography in heart transplant recipients:a comparative study with conventional coronary angiography[J].Int J Cardiovasc Imaging,2009,25(1):91-100.
[7]Boulmier D,Audinet C,Heautot JF,et al.Clinical contributions of 64-slice computed tomography in the evaluation of cardiomyopathy of unknown origin[J].Arch Cardiovasc Dis,2009,102(10):685-696.
[8]Meijboom WB,Meijs MFL,Schijf JD,et al.Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography:a prospective,multicenter,multivendor study[J].Journal of the American College of Cardiology,2008,52:2135-2144.
[9]Cademartiri F,Maffei E,Notarangelo F,et al.64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography:diagnostic accuracy in the real world[J].Radiol Med,2008,113(2):163-180.
[10]Cademartiri F,Maffei E,Palumbo A,et al.Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with low-to-intermediate risk[J].Radiol Med,2007,112(7):969-981.
[11]Shabestari AA,Abdi S,Akhlaghpoor S,et al.Diagnostic performance of 64-channel multislice computed tomography in assessment of significant coronary artery disease in symptomatic subjects[J].Am J Cardiol,2007,99(12):1656-1661.
[12]Pugliese F,Mollet NR,Runza G,et al.Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris[J].Eur Radiol,2006,16:575-582.
[13]Ropers D,Rixe J,Anders K,et al.Usefulness of multislice row spiral computed tomography with 64×0.6 mm collimation and330ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses[J].Am J Cardiol,2006,97:343-348.
[14]Nikolaou K,Knez A,Rist C,et al.Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease[J].AJR Am J Roentgenol,2006,187:111-117.
[15]Ghostine S,Caussin C,Daoud B,et al.Non-invasive detection of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block using 64-slice computed tomography[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2006,48(10):1929-1934.
[16]Meijboom WB,Mollet NR,Van Mieghem CAG,et al.Pre-operative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2006,48(8):1658-1665.
[17]Schuijf JD,Pundziute G,Jukema JW,et al.Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in the non-invasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease[J].Am J Cardiol,2006,98:145-148.
[18]Plass A,Grünenfelder J,Leschka S,et al.Coronary artery imaging with 64-slice computed tomography from cardiac surgical perspective[J].Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2006,30(1):109-116.
[19]Ehara M,Surmely JF,Kawai M,et al.Diagnostic accuracy of64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population-comparison with conventional invasive angiography[J].Circ J,2006,70:564-571.
[20]Mollet NR,Cademartiri F,van Mieghem CA,et al.High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography[J].Circulation,2005,112(15):2318-2323.
[21]Raff GL,Michael J.Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2005,46:552-557.
[22]Leschka S,Alkadhi H,Plass A,et al.Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology:first experience[J].Eur Heart J,2005,26(15):1482-1487.
[23]Leber AW,Knez A,Von Ziegler F,et al.Quantification of obstuctive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2005,46:147-154.
[24]邓永绍.64排128层螺旋CT冠脉成像对冠状动脉疾病的诊断价值[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2014,23(15):1680-1682.
[25]马海川,张龙,刘彬,等.64排128层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像与冠脉造影诊断冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病的临床价值探讨[J].陕西医学杂志,2014,43(1):57-59.
[26]刘荣华,徐宇崇.64排128层容积CT冠状动脉成像对冠心病诊断的价值[J].中国临床新医学,2014,7(1):45-47.
[27]陈海雄,杨少民.64排螺旋CT冠状动脉成像在冠心病诊断中的临床应用[J].航空航天医学杂志,2014,25(6):804-805.
[28]王晶,祝铭,庄玲玲,等.冠状动脉CT造影对冠心病的临床诊断价值研究[J].现代生物医学进展,2014,14(12):2271-2273.
[29]吴洁莹.冠心病诊断中多层螺旋CT技术的应用价值探讨[J].医学理论与实践,2014,27(7):939-940.
[30]甘锐,余文艺,兰华.多层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像在冠心病诊断中的价值[J].四川医学,2014,35(3):396-398.
[31]邵江,牟华明,李俊.128层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像在冠心病诊断中的应用价值[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志,2014,6(1):34-36.
[32]原桂梅,王惠东,庞永亮,等.128层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像在冠状动脉狭窄诊断中的价值研究[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2014,22(6):20-22.
[33]马海川,张龙,刘彬,等.64排128层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像与冠脉造影比较分析[J].医学影像学杂志,2013,23(11):1792-1795.
[34]董巧玲,高雯,刘宏明.64排冠脉CT和冠脉造影对冠心病诊断的对比研究[J].疾病监测与控制,2013,7(1):21-23.
[35]贺晋军.64排CT冠状动脉成像诊断冠状动脉狭窄的临床价值[J].求医问药,2013,11(3):211-212.
[36]赵杰,唐笑先,原杰.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像质量分析[J].实用医学影像杂志,2013,14(1):41-43.
[37]葛斌,刘鹏,朱建忠.64排128层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像与冠状动造影的对比研究[J].泰山医学院学报,2012,33(2):126-128.
[38]王补在,杨鸿翔,王天巨.64层螺旋CT诊断冠状动脉狭窄的准确性及限度[J].中国当代医药,2012,19(26):7-9.
[39]赵伟,任千里,靳恒军,等.64层螺旋CT诊断冠状动脉狭窄的价值[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2012,37(2):213-215.
[40]靳文剑,路新泉,梁晋泉,等.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像与冠状动脉造影的对比研究[J].实用医学影像杂志,2012,13(2):77-79.
[41]白志轩,石峻,彭勇,等.64层螺旋CT对冠状动脉狭窄病变诊断准确性的对比研究[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2012,19(1):8-14.
[42]曾文兵,牟华明,刘兴华,等.128层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像对冠心病诊断的临床价值[J].医学影像学杂志,2011,21(1):30-33.
[43]王志兵,张向左,宋钢山,等.64层螺旋CT在冠状动脉狭窄诊断中的应用价值[J].中国医药指南,2011,9(4):14-15.
[44]唐笑先,原杰,黄伟.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像在诊断冠状动脉疾病中的临床价值[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2011,9(5):524-525.
[45]黄俊,程涛.64层螺旋CT对冠状动脉疾病诊断价值的回顾性分析[J].安徽医学,2011,32(4):514-517.
[46]杨光杰,王振光,付军桦,等.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像诊断冠状动脉狭窄价值[J].齐鲁医学杂志,2011,26(1):33-35.
[47]刘爱君,吴刚,王桂云,等.64排螺旋CT在冠状动脉疾病诊断中的应用价值[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2011,20(5):580-581.
[48]张向隆,裴晓阳.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像对冠心病诊断的探讨[J].中外医疗,2011,30(17):173-174.
[49]薛松.128层螺旋CT在冠状动脉不同程度狭窄中的临床诊断价值[J].医药论坛杂志,2011,32(24):8-9.
[50]刘金生,叶贱辉,陈健民,等.128层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像在冠心病诊断中的应用价值[J].现代预防医学,2011,38(14):2868-2869.
[51]张红梅,王庆胜.64层螺旋CT在诊断冠状动脉狭窄的准确性与冠状动脉造影的对比研究[J].西部医学,2010,22(1):144-145.
[52]郭进利,高传玉,李牧蔚,等.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像判定冠状动脉狭窄的价值[J].心脏杂志,2010,22(2):255-257.
[53]王聚宝,沈海林,付芳芳,等.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像在冠心病诊断中的初步应用[J].中国血液流变学杂志,2010,20(2):316-320.
[54]胡嘉航,王玉成,徐敏.64层螺旋CT血管造影术诊断冠心病的临床应用价值[J].中国医疗器械信息,2010,16(8):31-32.
[55]刘平平,乔卫卫,刘同宝.64排螺旋CT在冠心病中的诊断价值[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2009,47(1):88-90.
[56]赵永霞,王敬稳,梁广路,等.64层螺旋CT冠脉成像在冠心病诊断中的应用[J].陕西医学杂志,2009,38(12):1628-1629.
[57]郭建平,朱杏莉,姚斯元,等.64排VCT冠状动脉成像与冠脉造影对冠心病诊断的对比研究[J].实用放射学杂志,2009,25(12):1745-1747.
[58]朱建新,孟宪平,谢旭刚,等.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像诊断冠状动脉疾病的临床应用[J].医学影像学杂志,2009,19(9):1126-1129.
[59]祁宏,谢明,王凯,等.64层螺旋CT诊断冠心病临床应用[J].内蒙古医学杂志,2008,40(6):709-711.
[60]萧毅,田建明,弓静,等.64层CT诊断冠状动脉狭窄的准确性:与常规血管造影比较[J].中国介入影像与治疗学,2007,4(3):188-191.
[61]严红,张黔桓,靳立军,等.64层螺旋CT成像与导管法造影检测冠状动脉狭窄的对照研究[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2007,15(5):266-269.
[62]李鹏雨,李坤成,杜祥颖,等.无常规心率控制下64排螺旋CT诊断冠状动脉狭窄的应用价值[J].临床放射学杂志,2007,26(6):566-570.
[63]李鹏雨,李坤成,杜祥颖,等.老年人多层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像诊断冠状动脉狭窄的研究[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2007,9(5):329-331.
[64]高建华,戴汝平,孙宪昶,等.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像与冠状动脉造影对照初步研究[J].实用放射学杂志,2007,33(2):165-168.
[65]黄贤胜,李春华,丁振江,等.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像对冠心病诊断价值研究[J].临床荟萃,2007,22(7):491-492.
[66]何忆雯,秦永文,丁仲如.64排螺旋CT冠脉成像在冠心病诊断中的应用[J].介入放射学杂志,2007,16(1):10-13.
[67]孟冷,张兆琪,吕飙.64层螺旋CT在冠状动脉疾病诊断中的价值[J].中华放射学杂志,2006,40(8):792-796.
[68]韩玮,刘惠亮,罗建平,等.64层螺旋CT血管成像在冠心病诊断中的应用[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2006,8(12):823-826.
[69]赵艳,魏嘉平,华琦,等.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像与冠状动脉造影对照研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2006,22(10):1468-1471.
[70]蒋学祥,邱建星,刘剑,等.64层螺旋CT评估冠状动脉狭窄的准确性—与传统冠状动脉造影对照研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2006,22(10):1472-1476.
[71]王怡宁,金征宇,孔令燕,等.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像初步研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2006,40(8):797-801.