传统和微创全瓷修复在前牙缺陷美学修复中的疗效观察
|
摘要
目的探讨在前牙缺陷美学修复中,传统和微创全瓷修复的临床价值。方法从我院收治的前牙缺陷患者中选取40例作为观察对象,患牙为46颗,按照抽签的方式将所有患者随机分成两组进行研究,以应用传统全瓷修复法为参照组(20例),以应用微创全瓷修复法为实验组(20例),对2组的修复效果进行对比和讨论。结果实验组修复6个月后的畸形过小牙、牙齿着色或变色、牙齿间隙、牙体表面缺损、切端缺损的满意评分和总体美学满意度评分均明显高于参照组,P<0.05。结论在前牙缺陷美学修复中,微创全瓷修复相比于传统修复法,具有更为显著的修复效果。
Objective to explore clinical value of traditional and minimally invasive all ceramic restoration in aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth defects. Methods choose 40 cases anterior tooth defect patients in our hospital as observation objects, with 46 teeth. Divide them into two groups according to drawing lots method. 20 cases in reference group were treated with traditional whole porcelain restoration method, and 20 cases in experimental group with minimally invasive whole porcelain restoration method. Compare and discuss restoration effect of two groups. Results after 6 months, satisfaction scores and overall aesthetic satisfaction scores of experimental group were significantly higher than reference group, P<0.05, including malformed small teeth, teeth coloring or discoloration, teeth space, tooth surface defect, cut end defect. Conclusion during aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth defects, minimally invasive all ceramic restoration has more significant effect than traditional restoration.
Objective to explore clinical value of traditional and minimally invasive all ceramic restoration in aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth defects. Methods choose 40 cases anterior tooth defect patients in our hospital as observation objects, with 46 teeth. Divide them into two groups according to drawing lots method. 20 cases in reference group were treated with traditional whole porcelain restoration method, and 20 cases in experimental group with minimally invasive whole porcelain restoration method. Compare and discuss restoration effect of two groups. Results after 6 months, satisfaction scores and overall aesthetic satisfaction scores of experimental group were significantly higher than reference group, P<0.05, including malformed small teeth, teeth coloring or discoloration, teeth space, tooth surface defect, cut end defect. Conclusion during aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth defects, minimally invasive all ceramic restoration has more significant effect than traditional restoration.
引文
[1]石晓玉.传统与微创全瓷修复在前牙缺陷美学修复中的效果比较[J].中国现代医生,2017,55(07):62-64.
[2]张李磊.微创全瓷修复在前牙缺陷美学修复中的临床效果[J].中国继续医学教育,2017,9(26):94-95.
[3]靳高杰.传统和微创全瓷修复中在前牙缺陷美学修复中的效果对比[J].全科口腔医学杂志:电子版,2016,3(04):37-38.
[4]李杰.光固化复合树脂前牙微创美学修复的临床研究[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志,2016,3(05):80-81.
[5]顾勤益.传统和微创全瓷修复技术在前牙缺陷美学修复中的临床治疗效果对比[J].中国医疗美容,2017,7(01):40-41.
[6]马瑜,田斌,马素荣.微创全瓷贴面在前牙美学修复中的临床研究[J].医药前沿,2016,6(30):118-119.
[7]郭平.全瓷修复体在前牙美学修复中的应用[J].中国社区医师,2017,33(08):69-69.
[8]谭荣才,李翠婷,黄稍稍.前牙缺陷美学修复应用传统和微创全瓷修复技术的效果比较[J].中外医学研究,2017,15(19):37-38.
[9]沈涛.前牙美学修复中氧化锆全瓷冠的临床应用研究[J].白求恩医学杂志,2017,15(04):452-453.
[10]李强.全瓷冠在前牙美学修复中的临床应用与效果评价[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志,2016,3(14):33-34.
[2]张李磊.微创全瓷修复在前牙缺陷美学修复中的临床效果[J].中国继续医学教育,2017,9(26):94-95.
[3]靳高杰.传统和微创全瓷修复中在前牙缺陷美学修复中的效果对比[J].全科口腔医学杂志:电子版,2016,3(04):37-38.
[4]李杰.光固化复合树脂前牙微创美学修复的临床研究[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志,2016,3(05):80-81.
[5]顾勤益.传统和微创全瓷修复技术在前牙缺陷美学修复中的临床治疗效果对比[J].中国医疗美容,2017,7(01):40-41.
[6]马瑜,田斌,马素荣.微创全瓷贴面在前牙美学修复中的临床研究[J].医药前沿,2016,6(30):118-119.
[7]郭平.全瓷修复体在前牙美学修复中的应用[J].中国社区医师,2017,33(08):69-69.
[8]谭荣才,李翠婷,黄稍稍.前牙缺陷美学修复应用传统和微创全瓷修复技术的效果比较[J].中外医学研究,2017,15(19):37-38.
[9]沈涛.前牙美学修复中氧化锆全瓷冠的临床应用研究[J].白求恩医学杂志,2017,15(04):452-453.
[10]李强.全瓷冠在前牙美学修复中的临床应用与效果评价[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志,2016,3(14):33-34.