二氧化锆全瓷冠与金属烤瓷冠在前牙修复中的应用效果比较
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comparison on the effect of zirconium dioxide all-ceramic crowns and porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns in anterior teeth restoration
  • 作者:谭荣才 ; 黄稍稍 ; 李翠婷
  • 英文作者:TAN Rong-cai;HUANG Shao-shao;LI Cui-ting;Department of Stomatology, Baise People's Hospital;
  • 关键词:二氧化锆 ; 前牙 ; 金属烤瓷冠 ; 牙冠 ; 牙龈
  • 英文关键词:Zirconium dioxide;;Anterior teeth;;Porcelain-fused-to-metal(PFM) crowns;;Crown;;Gums
  • 中文刊名:HAIN
  • 英文刊名:Hainan Medical Journal
  • 机构:百色市人民医院口腔科;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-25
  • 出版单位:海南医学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.30
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:HAIN201902021
  • 页数:3
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:46-1025/R
  • 分类号:80-82
摘要
目的比较二氧化锆全瓷冠与金属烤瓷冠在前牙修复中的应用效果。方法选取2014年6月至2017年5月间在百色市人民医院口腔科接受前牙全冠修复的200例患者为研究对象,根据随机数表法分为观察组和对照组,每组100例100颗患牙。对照组采用钴铬合金烤瓷冠修复,观察组采用二氧化锆全瓷冠修复,治疗后1周,比较两组患者的治疗效果,随访1年,比较两组外形、颜色匹配、边缘密合度及牙龈着色情况。结果观察组和对照组患者的治疗总有效率分别为98.0%和94.0%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组患者的牙龈炎症发生率为18.0%,明显低于对照组的36.0%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);随访1年,两组在外形合格率方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而观察组和对照组在颜色匹配(100.0%vs 84.0%)、边缘密合度合格(100.0%vs 88.0%)及无牙龈着色(100.0%vs 90.0%)方面比较,观察组均明显优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在前牙修复中,二氧化锆全瓷冠较钴铬合金烤瓷冠具有更高的应用价值。
        Objective To compare the application effect of zirconium dioxide all-ceramic crowns and porcelain-fused-to-metal(PFM) crowns in anterior teeth restoration. Methods A total of 200 patients who received full crown restoration in Department of Stomatology of Baise People's Hospital from June 2014 to May 2017 were selected as the study subjects. They were divided into the observation group and the control group according to random number table method, with 100 teeth in each group. The teeth in the control group were repaired with cobalt-chromium(Co-Cr)alloy porcelain crowns, and those in the observation group were repaired with zirconium dioxide all-ceramic crowns.The therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared one week after treatment. After one year of follow-up, the appearance, color matching, marginal fit and gingival eroticism of the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of the observation group and the control group were 98.0% and 94.0%, respectively(P>0.05); the incidence of gingivitis in the observation group was 18.0%, which was significantly lower than 36.0% in the control group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the qualified rate of appearance between the two groups after one year of follow-up(P>0.05). The color matching(100.0% vs 84.0%), edge closure(100.0% vs 88.0%) and no gingival staining(100.0% vs 90.0%) in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Zirconium dioxide all-ceramic crowns have higher application value than Co-Cr alloy ceramic crowns in the anterior teeth restoration.
引文
[1]李张维,康成容,吴妹娟,等.超声骨刀行冠延长术后纤维桩修复上颌前牙的临床应用[J].海南医学, 2015, 26(19):2862-2864.
    [2]李春生.二氧化锆全瓷冠与金属烤瓷冠在前牙修复中的应用研究[J].海南医学院学报, 2013, 19(3):396-398.
    [3]邓薇,杨永进,蔡兴伟,等.二氧化锆全瓷冠在前牙美容修复中的应用[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志, 2011, 12(2):101-103.
    [4]阚韶华,杨永进,蔡兴伟,等.二氧化锆全瓷冠与金合金烤瓷冠修复上前牙的临床效果观察[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志, 2015, 16(5):276-279.
    [5]武庆华,张晓东,朱坤,等.二氧化锆全瓷冠在前牙修复中的临床应用研究[J].中华全科医学, 2014, 12(6):866-868.
    [6]张非煜,吕亚林,董坚,等.二氧化锆全瓷冠对牙龈健康的影响[J].中国医药, 2013, 8(6):837-839.
    [7]胡振刚,周宝,梅林果,等.二氧化锆全瓷冠在前牙冠折美容修复中的临床应用[J].安徽医药, 2017, 21(8):1426-1428.
    [8]钟春.两种嵌体修复后牙邻面缺损的疗效对比[J].海南医学, 2013,24(21):3213-3215.
    [9]祖斌.前牙二氧化锆全瓷冠与镍铬合金烤瓷冠修复的临床对比分析[J].现代中西医结合杂志, 2013, 22(3):298-300.
    [10]武庆华.二氧化锆全瓷冠与镍铬合金烤瓷冠修复前牙的临床疗效比较[J].中国卫生产业, 2013,(28):148-150.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700