“一带一路”视野下亚欧铁路运输条约体系的冲突与协调
|
摘要
"一带一路"倡议将铁路作为连接欧亚大陆相关经济走廊的基本手段。亚欧铁路基础设施在"硬件"联通上已经居于世界前列,配套"软件"仍处于落后水平。《国际货约》和《国际货协》是调整亚欧大陆跨国铁路运输活动最为重要的两个公约,其规则适用的冲突阻碍了亚欧铁路运输及经贸往来的发展,抑制了亚欧两洲实现进一步的互联互通,与"一带一路"构想下"道路联通"和"贸易畅通"的主旨相悖。我国应参与亚欧统一铁路立法,实现国内铁路运输规则与国际公约的合理对接。
The Belt and Road Initiative regards the railway as a basic means of linking the relevant economic corridors of Eurasia. The Asia-Europe railway infrastructure is already in the forefront of the world in terms of "hardware"connectivity, while the matching rules are still at a backward level. The"Convention Concerning International Carriage of Goods by Rail"and the"Agreement on International Railroad through Transport of Goods"are two important conventions for the cross-border railway transportation activities in Eurasia. The conflict and confusion in the application of the rules has hindered the rapid development of Asia-Europe railway transportation and trade exchanges, and betrayed the principle of"road connection"and"unblocked transaction"of the Belt and Road Initiative. China needs to participate in and dominate the unified railway legislation of Eurasia and transplant international rules into China's railway law.
The Belt and Road Initiative regards the railway as a basic means of linking the relevant economic corridors of Eurasia. The Asia-Europe railway infrastructure is already in the forefront of the world in terms of "hardware"connectivity, while the matching rules are still at a backward level. The"Convention Concerning International Carriage of Goods by Rail"and the"Agreement on International Railroad through Transport of Goods"are two important conventions for the cross-border railway transportation activities in Eurasia. The conflict and confusion in the application of the rules has hindered the rapid development of Asia-Europe railway transportation and trade exchanges, and betrayed the principle of"road connection"and"unblocked transaction"of the Belt and Road Initiative. China needs to participate in and dominate the unified railway legislation of Eurasia and transplant international rules into China's railway law.
引文
[1]何佳馨.“一带一路”倡议与法律全球化之谱系分析及路径选择[J].法学, 2017,(6).
[2]贾兵兵.国际公法:理论与实践.[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2009.
[3]康颖丰.亚欧铁路国际联运运输法的协调——谈统一运单的推广使用[J].大陆桥视野, 2016,(11).
[4]李灿.新时代“一带一路”倡议下中欧班列运输规则体系的构建[J].西南政法大学学报, 2017,(6).
[5]李大朋.论“一带一路”倡议下以铁路运输为中心的国际货运规则重构[J].武大国际法评论, 2017,(4).
[6]莫世健,陈石.论国际铁路运输公约对“一带一路”的重要性[J].山东科技大学学报(社会科学版),2016,(2).
[7]权诗琦,张巍.中国与国际铁路运输政府间组织合作的思考[J].铁道运输与经济, 2017,(9).
[8]孙林.国际铁路货物联运统一铁路法研究[J].铁道经济研究, 2017,(2).
[9]王铁崖.国际法引论[M].北京:北京大学出版社, 1998.
[10]王淑敏,王为.国际铁路货物联运中的交货条款和贸易术语研究[C].高永富,陈晶莹.国际贸易法论丛.北京:北京大学出版社, 2007.
[11]王明国.“一带一路”倡议的国际制度基础[J].东北亚论坛, 2015,(6).
[12]王勇平.行走在亚欧大陆桥上[M].北京:中国铁道出版社, 2015.
[13]杨雷.中亚新跨国铁路的建设及其利益协调[J].欧亚经济, 2016,(1).
[14]张乃根.“一带一路”倡议下的国际经贸规则之重构[J].法学, 2016,(5).
[15] Bernhardt, R. International Organizations in General Universal International Organizations and Cooperation[J].International Organizations in General Universal International Organizations&Cooperation, 2016,(2).
[16] Melgar, B. H. The Transit of Goods in Public International Law[M]. Brill Nijhoff, 2015.
(1)邓丽娟. GATT过境自由争端第一案评析——评哥伦比亚入境口岸限制措施案[J].国际经贸探索, 2009,(11).
(2)王淑敏.“一带一路”战略下过境自由的法律问题研究[J].国际贸易问题, 2016,(1).
[2]贾兵兵.国际公法:理论与实践.[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2009.
[3]康颖丰.亚欧铁路国际联运运输法的协调——谈统一运单的推广使用[J].大陆桥视野, 2016,(11).
[4]李灿.新时代“一带一路”倡议下中欧班列运输规则体系的构建[J].西南政法大学学报, 2017,(6).
[5]李大朋.论“一带一路”倡议下以铁路运输为中心的国际货运规则重构[J].武大国际法评论, 2017,(4).
[6]莫世健,陈石.论国际铁路运输公约对“一带一路”的重要性[J].山东科技大学学报(社会科学版),2016,(2).
[7]权诗琦,张巍.中国与国际铁路运输政府间组织合作的思考[J].铁道运输与经济, 2017,(9).
[8]孙林.国际铁路货物联运统一铁路法研究[J].铁道经济研究, 2017,(2).
[9]王铁崖.国际法引论[M].北京:北京大学出版社, 1998.
[10]王淑敏,王为.国际铁路货物联运中的交货条款和贸易术语研究[C].高永富,陈晶莹.国际贸易法论丛.北京:北京大学出版社, 2007.
[11]王明国.“一带一路”倡议的国际制度基础[J].东北亚论坛, 2015,(6).
[12]王勇平.行走在亚欧大陆桥上[M].北京:中国铁道出版社, 2015.
[13]杨雷.中亚新跨国铁路的建设及其利益协调[J].欧亚经济, 2016,(1).
[14]张乃根.“一带一路”倡议下的国际经贸规则之重构[J].法学, 2016,(5).
[15] Bernhardt, R. International Organizations in General Universal International Organizations and Cooperation[J].International Organizations in General Universal International Organizations&Cooperation, 2016,(2).
[16] Melgar, B. H. The Transit of Goods in Public International Law[M]. Brill Nijhoff, 2015.
(1)邓丽娟. GATT过境自由争端第一案评析——评哥伦比亚入境口岸限制措施案[J].国际经贸探索, 2009,(11).
(2)王淑敏.“一带一路”战略下过境自由的法律问题研究[J].国际贸易问题, 2016,(1).