从企业缺位看大学生资助经费筹措主体识别与精准资助的路径设计
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Financial Assistance Sources of College Students and Path of Targeted Funding——An analysis starting from the absence of enterprises
  • 作者:邓敏
  • 英文作者:DENG Min;Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine;
  • 关键词:大学生资助 ; 资助经费筹措 ; 精准资助
  • 英文关键词:college students funding;;financial funds raising;;targeted funding
  • 中文刊名:YZDG
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Yangzhou University(Higher Education Study Edition)
  • 机构:南京中医药大学;
  • 出版日期:2018-10-25 11:52
  • 出版单位:扬州大学学报(高教研究版)
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.22;No.117
  • 基金:江苏省教育科学“十三五”规划课题“以基金形式建立大学生资助经费投入长效机制研究”(X-c/2016/05)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:YZDG201805016
  • 页数:7
  • CN:05
  • ISSN:32-1466/G4
  • 分类号:93-99
摘要
大学生资助规模不断扩大的严峻局势迫切需要展开资助经费来源的多元化研究。通过利益相关者分析,识别经费筹措联盟应争取的五位确定型角色(中央政府、地方政府、高等院校、金融机构和企业)。多元化的筹资渠道是保障大学生资助经费充足和稳定的重要基础,但以企业为重要代表的社会资金缺位是推进资金多元化的巨大阻碍。运用博弈方法探讨企业参与大学生资助活动的理论依据,给出面向大学生培养的精准资助路径,在多方共赢的前提下为解决企业缺位的问题提供解决思路。
        The expanding financial assistance offered to college students makes it urgent to calculate the diversity of financial assistance sources.Stakeholder analysis shows that five kinds of institutions are proper sponsors:central government,local government,universities,financial institution and enterprises.However,the absence of social funds represented by enterprises is a huge obstacle to diversifying funds.Game Theory offers the theoretical basis for enterprises participating in college student funding and the path of targeted funding is also proposed.In the multi-win situation,enterprises are hopefully willing to participate in sponsoring college students.
引文
[1]Levin H.Financing the education of at-risk students[J].Educational Evaluation&Policy Analysis,1989,11(1):47-60.
    [2]Strosnider K.A university relies on its endowment to cover the costs of financial aid[J].The Chronicle of Higher Education,1998(6):37-39.
    [3]Long M.Government financial assistance for Australian university students[J].Journal of Higher Education Policy&Management,2002,24(2):127-143.
    [4]王峰虎.西部地方高校贫困生资助体系转型的难题与对策——对陕西省属高校贫困生资助情况的调查报告[J].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006(2):73-76.
    [5]Lerner J,Schoar A,Wang J.Secrets of the academy:the drivers of university endowment success[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing,2008,22(3):207-222.
    [6]Harman G.Funding of university research[J].International Encyclopedia of Education(Third Edition),2010(12):279-285.
    [7]李东阳.改革高校学生资助体系:增加对口单位资助[J].知识经济,2010(12):96-97.
    [8]Viaene J M,Zilcha I.Public funding of higher education[J].Journal of Public Economics,2013,108(12):78-89.
    [9]Maria T D,Bleotu V.Modern trends in higher education funding[J].Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2014,116(21):2226-2230.
    [10]范晓婷,曲绍卫.经济新常态下全国高校学生资助经费管理研究——基于2007-2013年学生资助发展报告统计数据分析[J].教育发展研究,2015(19):47-52.
    [11]赵立成.新常态下贫困大学生资助经费管理创新机制研究[J].中国乡镇企业会计,2016(7):193-194.
    [12]Broome M E,Bowersox D,Relf M.A new funding model for nursing education through business development initiatives[J].Journal of Professional Nursing,2018,34(2):97-102.
    [13]张玉静,陈建成.绿色行政利益相关者识别与分类的实证研究[C].2010International Conference on Future Information Technology and Management Engineering,2010:100-103.
    [14]柏檀,周德群.高等教育质量的利益相关者动态分析[J].黑龙江高教研究,2009(10):7-9.
    [15]米学娇,王梅.英国研究生教育质量保障主体责任分担机制探究——基于利益相关者的视角[J].教育探索,2016(9):147-150.
    [16]王传倩.美国联邦政府大学生资助体系研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2007.
    [17]冯涛,卫磊.基于人力资本理论视角的高校农村学生资助分析[J].教育评论,2008(6):56-58.
    [18]Mitchell R K,Agle B R,Wood D J.Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience:defining the principle of who and what really counts[J].Academy of Management Review,1997(22):853-886.
    [19]陈芳.甘肃高校学生资助体系及运行状况调查[D].兰州:兰州大学,2012.
    [20]滕航.企业向高校捐赠的效用分析[J].科技创业月刊,2009(1):28-29.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700