微创经皮肾镜碎石与输尿管镜碎石术治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石的效果对比
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comparative Evaluation of Curative Effect of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Calculi
  • 作者:赖建华
  • 英文作者:LAI Jianhua;Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Xiamen;
  • 关键词:输尿管上段结石 ; 输尿管镜碎石术 ; 微创经皮肾镜碎石
  • 英文关键词:Upper ureteral calculi;;Ureteroscopic lithotripsy;;Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotripsy
  • 中文刊名:YJZY
  • 英文刊名:Chinese and Foreign Medical Research
  • 机构:厦门市中医院;
  • 出版日期:2018-04-25
  • 出版单位:中外医学研究
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.16;No.380
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:YJZY201812017
  • 页数:2
  • CN:12
  • ISSN:23-1555/R
  • 分类号:43-44
摘要
目的:探讨嵌顿性输尿管上段结石运用输尿管镜碎石术与微创经皮肾镜碎石术治疗的临床效果。方法:随机选取笔者所在医院2015年1月-2017年1月收治的80例嵌顿性输尿管上段结石患者为研究对象,将其分为两组,其中对照组行输尿管镜碎石术,而观察组则运用超声+气压弹道经皮肾镜碎石术,比较两组疗效。结果:观察组的结石清除率高于对照组,且中转手术率低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组的并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组手术时间和住院时间短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:临床上运用微创经皮肾镜碎石术治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石效果显著。
        Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of ureteroscopic lithotripsy and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of impacted upper ureteral calculi.Method:A total of 80 patients with incarcerated upper ureteral calculi treated in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2017 were randomly selected and divided into two groups.The control group was treated with ureteroscopic lithotripsy,while the observation group was treated with ultrasound plus barometric ballistic percutaneous nephrolithotripsy.The curative effect of the two groups were compared.Result:The removal rate of stone in the observation group was higher than that of the control group,and the rate of transfer operation was lower than that of the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The operation time and the time of hospitalization in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of impacted upper ureteral calculi is effective clinically.
引文
[1]程洪林,郭闯,李旭明,等.输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术与微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗输尿管上段嵌顿结石合并感染的对比研究[J].重庆医学,2014,43(4):442-444.
    [2]李应忠,王健,佟发春,等.微创经皮肾镜碎石与输尿管镜碎石术治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石的疗效比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2014,14(7):631-633.
    [3]江典存,檀华楷,林长江,等.微创经皮肾镜取石和经尿道输尿管镜碎石治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的疗效比较[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2013,18(2):138-140.
    [4]段良斌,张国顺,胡仁广.微创经皮肾镜碎石术和经尿道输尿管镜碎石术治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的疗效比较[J].中国医药指南,2013,11(10):482-483.
    [5]秦成玺.微创经皮肾镜取石术和经尿道输尿管镜碎石术治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的疗效比较[J].临床医学,2015,35(2):89-90.
    [6]邓助朋,陈宁,刘东彪,等.经皮肾镜取石与输尿管镜碎石术治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石疗效比较分析[J].中国实用医药,2015,10(12):19-21.
    [7]彭赟杰.微创经皮肾镜碎石与输尿管镜碎石术治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石的疗效分析[J].中国医学工程,2015,23(11):77,80.
    [8]许文平.经皮肾镜取石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石疗效对比[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2016,16(85):25-26.
    [9]黄朝友.经皮肾镜取石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石疗效比较及对肾功能的影响[J].实用医院临床杂志,2017,14(3):64-66.
    [10]余子强,邹建安,邵明峰,等.输尿管镜碎石术联合封堵取石导管与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石的疗效比较[J].中国临床医学,2015,22(6):796-798.
    [11]韩志刚,陈鑫,刘晓东,等.微创经皮肾镜钬激光碎石术治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石68例疗效分析[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2015,4(5):286-288.
    [12]李国庆,赵宏伟,王林.经皮肾镜取石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石疗效对比[J].中国现代医生,2016,54(21):96-98.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700