几种新颖的杀虫剂对甘蓝蚜虫防治效果研究
|
摘要
采用田间药效试验方法,比较了几种植物源杀虫剂及结构新颖的化学合成杀虫剂与传统杀虫剂对甘蓝蚜虫的防治效果。结果表明:药后1 d,6种试验药剂对甘蓝蚜虫的防治效果分别为81.17%、70.34%、77.83%、88.25%、79.48%和84.82%,10%氟啶虫酰胺水分散粒剂60 g/hm~2处理防效最高,0.3%苦参碱水剂7.5 g/hm~2、6%鱼藤酮微乳剂37.5 g/hm~2处理防效与传统杀虫剂50%啶虫脒水分散粒剂21 g/hm~2及10%高效氯氟氰菊酯水乳剂7.5 g/hm~2处理防效基本相当;药后7 d,各处理防效分别为88.36%、83.68%、85.81%、94.29%、89.32%和86.75%,10%氟啶虫酰胺水分散粒剂60 g/hm~2防效仍保持90%以上,0.3%苦参碱水剂7.5 g/hm~2、2%印楝素水分散粒剂13.5 g/hm~2、6%鱼藤酮微乳剂37.5 g/hm~2处理防效均在83%以上,且均与传统杀虫剂处理防效基本相当。本研究选取的几种新颖杀虫剂可以替代传统杀虫剂用于甘蓝蚜虫的防治。
Using the field efficacy trial method, control effects of several botanical insecticides and chemically synthesized insecticides with novel structures against cabbage aphid were compared with that of traditional insecticides. Results showed control effects of six test agents after 1 day were 81.17%, 70.34%, 77.83%,88.25%, 79.48% and 84.82%, respectively; of them, the control effect of 10% flonicamid WDG 60 g/hm~2 was the highest, that of 0.3% matrine AS 7.5 g/hm~2, 6% rotenone ME 37.5 g/hm~2, and that of traditional insecticides 50%acetamiprid WDG 21 g/hm~2 and 10% lambda-cyhalothrin EW 7.5 g/hm~2 were equivalent; Control effects of all 6treatments after 7 days were 88.36%, 83.68%, 85.81%, 94.29%, 89.32% and 86.75%, respectively; while after 7days that of 10% flonicamid WDG 60 g/hm~2 remained above 90%, that of 0.3% matrine AS 7.5 g/hm~2, 2%azadirachtin WDG 13.5 g/hm~2, and 6% rotenone ME 37.5 g/hm~2 were all above 83%, and these were basically equivalent to that of the traditional pesticide treatments. These several novel insecticides selected in this study can be used to replace the traditional insecticides in cabbage aphids control.
Using the field efficacy trial method, control effects of several botanical insecticides and chemically synthesized insecticides with novel structures against cabbage aphid were compared with that of traditional insecticides. Results showed control effects of six test agents after 1 day were 81.17%, 70.34%, 77.83%,88.25%, 79.48% and 84.82%, respectively; of them, the control effect of 10% flonicamid WDG 60 g/hm~2 was the highest, that of 0.3% matrine AS 7.5 g/hm~2, 6% rotenone ME 37.5 g/hm~2, and that of traditional insecticides 50%acetamiprid WDG 21 g/hm~2 and 10% lambda-cyhalothrin EW 7.5 g/hm~2 were equivalent; Control effects of all 6treatments after 7 days were 88.36%, 83.68%, 85.81%, 94.29%, 89.32% and 86.75%, respectively; while after 7days that of 10% flonicamid WDG 60 g/hm~2 remained above 90%, that of 0.3% matrine AS 7.5 g/hm~2, 2%azadirachtin WDG 13.5 g/hm~2, and 6% rotenone ME 37.5 g/hm~2 were all above 83%, and these were basically equivalent to that of the traditional pesticide treatments. These several novel insecticides selected in this study can be used to replace the traditional insecticides in cabbage aphids control.
引文
[1]苏克跃,王云海,严寒,等.苦参碱防治甘蓝蚜虫和茄子灰霉病的田间防效评价[J].中国植保导刊, 2013, 33(12):66-67.
[2]姬小雪,乔康,刘麦丰. 2.5%鱼藤酮乳油防治甘蓝蚜虫田间药效试验[J].生物灾害科学, 2012(4):407-409.
[3] Kazana E, Pope T W, Tibbles L. The cabbage aphid:a walking mustard oil bomb[J]. Proc R Soc London Ser B, 2007, 274:2271-2277.
[4]费春华,俞建明,陆致平. 10%烯啶虫胺水剂防治甘蓝蚜虫药效试验[J].上海蔬菜, 2009(4):76-76.
[5]方燕,乔格侠,张广学.蚜虫寄主植物与取食部位的多样性[J].动物分类学报, 2006(1):31-39.
[6]黄晓磊,乔格侠.蚜虫学研究现状与学科发展趋势[J].昆虫学报, 2006(6):1017-1026.
[7]唐平华,陈国平,朱明库,等.蚜虫防治技术研究进展[J].植物保护, 2013, 39(2):5-12.
[8]师宝君. 7种杀虫剂防治甘蓝蚜虫田间药效试验[J].安徽农学通报, 2011, 17(17):102-103.
[9]庄明,高德良,徐娜娜,等.七种烟碱类杀虫剂对甘蓝蚜虫的室内毒力比较[J].山东化工, 2018(7):13-16.
[10]黄国洋.农药试验技术与评价方法[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2000:12-15.
[11]农业部农药检定所生测室.农药田间药效准则[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 1993:127-129.
[12]韩俊艳,张立竹,纪明山.植物源杀虫剂的研究进展[J].中国农学通报, 2011, 27(21):229-233.
[13]鲍方印,王松,陆晓明,等.几种植物提取液对甘蓝蚜虫的防治效果[J].安徽科技学院学报, 2003, 17(3):54-56.
[14]赵云彤,时新瑞,孟祥海,等.牡丹江丘陵半山区利用苦参碱、烟碱+皂素防治大豆蚜虫效果研究[J].大豆科学, 2014,33(2):287-289.
[15]赵千,杨春清,孙明舒. 3种植物源杀虫剂防治蚜虫效果研究[J].安徽农业科学, 2008(4):1488-1489.
[16]邓明学,覃博瑞,邓欣毅,等.氟啶虫酰胺10%可湿性粉剂防治柑橘蚜虫、粉虱等4种柑橘嫩梢期害虫田间药效试验[J].农药科学与管理, 2015, 36(2):46-51.
[17]刘秀春,范业宏,王宝申,等.氟啶虫酰胺防治苹果黄蚜药效试验[J].农药, 2008(5):370-371.
[18]杨帆,单俊奇,赵倩倩,等.不同施药方式下氟啶虫酰胺对甘蓝主要害虫的田间防治效果[J].长江蔬菜, 2017(24):71-75.
[19] He Juan, Gao Huanhuan, Zhao Huiyan, et al. Effect of static magnetic field(SMF)on the viability and fecundity of aphid Sitobion avenae(Homoptera:Aphididae)under laboratory conditions. Archives of Biological Sciences, 2012. 64(2):693-702
[20]李娟,安德荣.捕杀特黄板对烟蚜及烟田蚜传病毒病防治效果的研究[J].中国烟草学报, 2010, 16(2):70-72.
[2]姬小雪,乔康,刘麦丰. 2.5%鱼藤酮乳油防治甘蓝蚜虫田间药效试验[J].生物灾害科学, 2012(4):407-409.
[3] Kazana E, Pope T W, Tibbles L. The cabbage aphid:a walking mustard oil bomb[J]. Proc R Soc London Ser B, 2007, 274:2271-2277.
[4]费春华,俞建明,陆致平. 10%烯啶虫胺水剂防治甘蓝蚜虫药效试验[J].上海蔬菜, 2009(4):76-76.
[5]方燕,乔格侠,张广学.蚜虫寄主植物与取食部位的多样性[J].动物分类学报, 2006(1):31-39.
[6]黄晓磊,乔格侠.蚜虫学研究现状与学科发展趋势[J].昆虫学报, 2006(6):1017-1026.
[7]唐平华,陈国平,朱明库,等.蚜虫防治技术研究进展[J].植物保护, 2013, 39(2):5-12.
[8]师宝君. 7种杀虫剂防治甘蓝蚜虫田间药效试验[J].安徽农学通报, 2011, 17(17):102-103.
[9]庄明,高德良,徐娜娜,等.七种烟碱类杀虫剂对甘蓝蚜虫的室内毒力比较[J].山东化工, 2018(7):13-16.
[10]黄国洋.农药试验技术与评价方法[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2000:12-15.
[11]农业部农药检定所生测室.农药田间药效准则[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 1993:127-129.
[12]韩俊艳,张立竹,纪明山.植物源杀虫剂的研究进展[J].中国农学通报, 2011, 27(21):229-233.
[13]鲍方印,王松,陆晓明,等.几种植物提取液对甘蓝蚜虫的防治效果[J].安徽科技学院学报, 2003, 17(3):54-56.
[14]赵云彤,时新瑞,孟祥海,等.牡丹江丘陵半山区利用苦参碱、烟碱+皂素防治大豆蚜虫效果研究[J].大豆科学, 2014,33(2):287-289.
[15]赵千,杨春清,孙明舒. 3种植物源杀虫剂防治蚜虫效果研究[J].安徽农业科学, 2008(4):1488-1489.
[16]邓明学,覃博瑞,邓欣毅,等.氟啶虫酰胺10%可湿性粉剂防治柑橘蚜虫、粉虱等4种柑橘嫩梢期害虫田间药效试验[J].农药科学与管理, 2015, 36(2):46-51.
[17]刘秀春,范业宏,王宝申,等.氟啶虫酰胺防治苹果黄蚜药效试验[J].农药, 2008(5):370-371.
[18]杨帆,单俊奇,赵倩倩,等.不同施药方式下氟啶虫酰胺对甘蓝主要害虫的田间防治效果[J].长江蔬菜, 2017(24):71-75.
[19] He Juan, Gao Huanhuan, Zhao Huiyan, et al. Effect of static magnetic field(SMF)on the viability and fecundity of aphid Sitobion avenae(Homoptera:Aphididae)under laboratory conditions. Archives of Biological Sciences, 2012. 64(2):693-702
[20]李娟,安德荣.捕杀特黄板对烟蚜及烟田蚜传病毒病防治效果的研究[J].中国烟草学报, 2010, 16(2):70-72.