上海市某高校卫生管理专业研究生新生培训制度效果评价
|
摘要
目的:评价上海市某高校卫生事业管理专业研究生新生培训制度的效果,以期进一步优化、完善培训制度。方法:通过问卷调查32名新生、焦点组访谈2位教师和5名新生,运用Kirkpatrick模型从反应、学习、行为和结果层面评估新生培训制度的效果。结果:新生对培训重要性和必要性的认可比例均为81.3%;对各模块培训内容的理解程度较高;培训使新生能够更快适应新环境和融入项目组,并初步掌握基本科研技能。结论:新生培训制度效果良好,但在时间安排、内容设置方面仍可进一步优化。Kirkpatrick模型是评估新生培训效果的有效手段。
Objective: To evaluate the effects of the training for the new graduate students of major of health services management by using the Kirkpatrick model and to provide suggestions for optimizing the training scheme. Methods: The questionnaire survey including 32 new graduate students and the focus group interview including 2 teachers and 5 students were conducted. The Kirkpatrick model was applied to assess the effects of the training for the new graduate students through the four levels of reaction,learning,behavior and results. Results: The recognition proportion of the importance and necessity of the training for new students was 81.3%. The training courses were well perceived,which enabled the new graduate students to adapt to the new environment,integrate into the research team and master the basic research skills more quickly. Conclusion:The training has achieved positive effects through the evaluation of the Kirkpatrick model,which could be improved in time schedule and course arrangement.
Objective: To evaluate the effects of the training for the new graduate students of major of health services management by using the Kirkpatrick model and to provide suggestions for optimizing the training scheme. Methods: The questionnaire survey including 32 new graduate students and the focus group interview including 2 teachers and 5 students were conducted. The Kirkpatrick model was applied to assess the effects of the training for the new graduate students through the four levels of reaction,learning,behavior and results. Results: The recognition proportion of the importance and necessity of the training for new students was 81.3%. The training courses were well perceived,which enabled the new graduate students to adapt to the new environment,integrate into the research team and master the basic research skills more quickly. Conclusion:The training has achieved positive effects through the evaluation of the Kirkpatrick model,which could be improved in time schedule and course arrangement.
引文
[1]袁本涛,王传毅,吴青.我国在校研究生的学术贡献有多大?[J].高等工程教育研究,2015(1):154-160.
[2]赵世奎,张帅,沈文钦.研究生参与科研现状及其对培养质量的影响——基于部分高校和科研单位的调查分析[J].学位与研究生教育,2014(4):49-53.
[3]臧伟伟,张颖.研究生新生心理健康状况研究及培养工作建议——基于SCL-90的3年调研分析[J].思想教育研究,2016(10):117-121.
[4]谭敏.跨学科背景硕士研究生培养研究[D].广西师范大学,2011.
[5]王进.研究生新生的科研选择焦虑症[J].科技导报,2014,32(30):87.
[6]张子夏.我国综合性公立医院门诊患者体验测量工具研究[D].华中科技大学,2016.
[7]张琴,谢轶琼,兰亚佳.职业生命质量量表(QWL7-32)的研制[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2013,44(6):957-961.
[8]风笑天.社会学研究方法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2014.
[9]蒋小娟,刘新凤,赵亚栋,等.Kirkpatrick四级评估法在艾滋病健康教育培训效果评估中的应用[J].现代预防医学,2014,41(16):2956-2959.
[10]DONALD L K,JAMES D K.Evaluating training programs:the four levels[M].San Francisco:Berrett-Kerrett Publishers,2006.
[11]刘润进,李敏,原永兵.培养研究生科研能力的几点做法[J].学位与研究生教育,2004(11):38-41.
[12]王大伟.研究生教育理论与实践[M].长沙:中南工业大学出版社,1998.
[13]杜震宇.文献沙龙应用于理科研究生新生学术启蒙教育的实践[J].学位与研究生教育,2014(7):10-12.
[14]牟承碧.研究生新生入学教育的实践与思考[J].思想教育研究,2009(S2):191-194.
[15]康乐汀,丘丽琼.柯氏四级评估模式在医院新员工岗前培训中的应用[J].卫生经济研究,2016(8):58-59.
[2]赵世奎,张帅,沈文钦.研究生参与科研现状及其对培养质量的影响——基于部分高校和科研单位的调查分析[J].学位与研究生教育,2014(4):49-53.
[3]臧伟伟,张颖.研究生新生心理健康状况研究及培养工作建议——基于SCL-90的3年调研分析[J].思想教育研究,2016(10):117-121.
[4]谭敏.跨学科背景硕士研究生培养研究[D].广西师范大学,2011.
[5]王进.研究生新生的科研选择焦虑症[J].科技导报,2014,32(30):87.
[6]张子夏.我国综合性公立医院门诊患者体验测量工具研究[D].华中科技大学,2016.
[7]张琴,谢轶琼,兰亚佳.职业生命质量量表(QWL7-32)的研制[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2013,44(6):957-961.
[8]风笑天.社会学研究方法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2014.
[9]蒋小娟,刘新凤,赵亚栋,等.Kirkpatrick四级评估法在艾滋病健康教育培训效果评估中的应用[J].现代预防医学,2014,41(16):2956-2959.
[10]DONALD L K,JAMES D K.Evaluating training programs:the four levels[M].San Francisco:Berrett-Kerrett Publishers,2006.
[11]刘润进,李敏,原永兵.培养研究生科研能力的几点做法[J].学位与研究生教育,2004(11):38-41.
[12]王大伟.研究生教育理论与实践[M].长沙:中南工业大学出版社,1998.
[13]杜震宇.文献沙龙应用于理科研究生新生学术启蒙教育的实践[J].学位与研究生教育,2014(7):10-12.
[14]牟承碧.研究生新生入学教育的实践与思考[J].思想教育研究,2009(S2):191-194.
[15]康乐汀,丘丽琼.柯氏四级评估模式在医院新员工岗前培训中的应用[J].卫生经济研究,2016(8):58-59.