用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于温度的参考作物蒸散量计算方法的适用性评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Applicability Evaluation of Temperature-based Methods for Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration
  • 作者:刘倩 ; 张方敏 ; 李威鹏 ; 杨雷刚 ; 景元书
  • 英文作者:Liu Qian;Zhang Fangmin;Li Weipeng;Yang Leigang;Jing Yuanshu;Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Agricultural Meteorology,NUIST;
  • 关键词:参考作物蒸散量 ; FAO98 ; Penman-Monteith方法 ; 温度法 ; 适用性评价
  • 英文关键词:reference evapotranspiration;;FAO98 Penman-Monteith method;;temperature method;;applicability evaluation
  • 中文刊名:HNQX
  • 英文刊名:Meteorological and Environmental Sciences
  • 机构:南京信息工程大学气象灾害预报预警与评估协同创新中心/江苏省农业气象重点实验室;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-25 11:06
  • 出版单位:气象与环境科学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.42;No.187
  • 基金:江苏省优秀青年基金项目(SBK2017030092);; 中国气象局农业气象保障与应用技术重点开放实验室开放研究基金项目(AMF201608)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:HNQX201902003
  • 页数:8
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:41-1386/P
  • 分类号:21-28
摘要
参考作物蒸散量是表征气候干湿程度、植被耗水量、生产潜力及水资源供需平衡的重要指标之一。以海口和敦煌两个气候相差较大的站点为例,利用Irmark-Allen、Hargreaves、Jensen-Haise 3种基于温度的ET_0计算方法,计算了2013—2015年两个站点的参考作物蒸散量,以FAO98 Penman-Monteith方法计算所得结果为标准,依据相关系数(R)及其显著性(P)、均方根误差(RMSE)和平均偏差(MBE)等量化指标,分别对3种方法计算结果在两个站点月和日序列的适用性进行评价,并对这3种方法进行本地化修正优化和检验。结果表明:本地化前,Irmark-Allen方法在海口的计算与Penman-Monteith的偏差最小且相关性好(R=0.97,P<0.01,RMSE=0.38mm/d,MBE=-0.01mm/d),其他两种方法均高估。3种基于温度的ET_0方法在敦煌都有很大的误差,其中Irmark-Allen方法在夏季偏低,在冬季偏高;Hargreaves方法整体偏高;Jensen-Haise方法在冬季不适用,出现无效负值,而在其他时段偏高。本地化后,3种基于温度的ET_0方法在两个地区都得到明显改善,其中Jensen-Haise方法在海口效果最好(R=0.96,P<0.01,RMSE=0.61mm/d,MBE=0.003mm/d),在敦煌效果也是最好的(R=0.96,P<0.01,RMSE=0.69mm/d,MBE=-0.02mm/d)。
        The reference evapotranspiration(ET_0) is one of the important indicators to characterize the degree of climate drying,vegetation water consumption,potential productivity and water supply-demand balance.In this study,we evaluated the applicability of 3 temperature-based ET_0 methods including Irmark-Allen,Hargreaves,and Jensen-Haise in Haikou and Dunhuang stations with different climates compared to FAO98 Penman-Monteith method and optimized and checked out in each local site.The daily and monthly series of ET_0 were calculated from 2013 to 2015 using FAO98 Penman-Monteith and 3 temperature-based methods.The quantitative indices included correlation coefficient(R),significant(P) root-mean-square error(RMSE) and mean variation(MBE).Results showed that before localization,Irmark-Allen method performed best with the lowest deviation and highest correlation(R=0.97,P<0.01,RMSE=0.38 mm/d,MBE=-0.01 mm/d) in Haikou,while other two temperature-based methods overestimated ET_0 compared to FAO98 Penman-Monteith method.On the other hand,all 3 temperature-based methods were with large biases in Dunhuang,the ET_0 calculated by Irmark-Allen method was underestimated in summer but overestimated in winter,by Hargreaves method was overestimated for the whole period,by Jensen-Haise method was overestimated and invalid(ET_0<0) in winter.After localization,the 3 temperature-based methods were improved significantly in 2 regions.The optimized Jensen-Haise method was best performed in Haikou(R=0.96,P<0.01,RMSE=0.61 mm/d,MBE=0.003 mm/d) and Dunhuang(R=0.96,P<0.01,RMSE=0.69 mm/d,MBE=-0.02 mm/d).
引文
[1] Sau F,Boote K J,Bostick M N,et al.Testing and Improving Evapotranspiration and Soil Water Balance of the DSSAT Crop Models[J].Agronomy Journal,2004,96(5):1243.
    [2]周广胜.气候变化对中国农业生产影响研究展望[J].气象与环境科学,2015,38(1):80-94.
    [3]马珺玢,杨崧,王子谦.中南半岛春季土壤湿度异常对亚洲热带夏季风建立和发展的影响 [J].气象与环境科学,2018,41(1):19-30.
    [4]薛昌颖.基于作物模型的河南省旱稻干旱风险评估[J].气象与环境科学,2016,39(2):126-131.
    [5]汤鹏程,何蒙,苗澍,等.不同ET0计算方法在内蒙古东部地区适用性比较[J].干旱地区农业研究,2016,34(1):38-42.
    [6]贾悦,崔宁博,魏新平,等.基于反距离权重法的长江流域参考作物蒸散量算法适用性评价[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(6):130-138.
    [7]刘晓英,李玉中,王庆锁.几种基于温度的参考作物蒸散量计算方法的评价[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(6):12-18.
    [8]吴东,何奇瑾,潘志华,等.东北春玉米不同生育阶段日蒸散发模型的适用性研究[J].中国农业大学学报,2017,22(8):18-29.
    [9]李玉霖,崔建垣,张铜会.参考作物蒸散量计算方法的比较研究[J].中国沙漠,2002,22(4):372-376.
    [10]杜尧东,刘作新,张运福.参考作物蒸散计算方法及其评价[J].河南农业大学学报,2001,35(1):57-61.
    [11]Balaji N,Raghavan S.Determination of regional scale evapotranspiration of Texas from NOAA-AV HRR satellite[M].Texas:Texas Water Resources Institute Report,2002.
    [12]Hargreaves G H,Samani Z A.Reference crop evapotranspiration from ambient air temperature[J].American society of Agricultural Engineer,1985,1(2):85-97.
    [13]Hargreaves G H,Allen R G.History and evaluation of Hargreaves evapotranspiration equation.J Irrig Drain EngASCE[J].Journal of Irrigation & Drainage Engineering,2003,129(1):53-63.
    [14]Trajkovic S,Kolakovic S.Evaluation of Reference Evapotranspiration Equations Under Humid Conditions[J].Water Resources Management,2009,23(14):3057-3067.
    [15]Gao Y,Long D,Li Z L.Estimation of daily actual evapotranspiration from remotely sensed data under complex terrain over the upper Chao river basin in North China[J].International Journal of Remote Sensing,2008,29(11):3295-3315.
    [16]Jensen D T,Hargreaves G H,Temesgen B,et al.Computation of ETo under Nonideal Conditions[J].Journal of Irrigation & Drainage Engineering,1997,123(5):394-400.
    [17]Liu X,Xu C,Zhong X,et al.Comparison of 16 models for reference crop evapotranspiration against weighing lysimetermeasurement[J].Agricultural Water Management,2017,184:145-155.
    [18]王永东,邱永志,许波,等.参考作物蒸散量计算方法在极端干旱区的适用性[J].干旱区研究,2014,31(3):390-396.
    [19]谢平,陈晓宏,刘丙军.湛江地区适宜参考作物蒸发蒸腾量计算模型分析[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(5):6-9.
    [20]闫浩芳,史海滨,薛铸,等.内蒙古河套灌区ET0不同计算方法的对比研究[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(4):103-106.
    [21]冯禹,崔宁博,龚道枝,等.基于极限学习机的参考作物蒸散量预测模型[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(增刊):153-160.
    [22]孙庆宇,佟玲,张宝忠,等.参考作物蒸发蒸腾量计算方法在海河流域的适用性[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(11):68-72.
    [23]李晨,崔宁博,冯禹,等.四川省不同区域参考作物蒸散量计算方法的适用性评价[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(4):127-134.
    [24]徐冰,汤鹏程,郭克贞,等.西藏高寒牧区不同ET0计算方法适用性[J].灌溉排水学报,2014,33(6):127-130.
    [25]王晓晨,朱忠礼,季辰,等.几种蒸散计算方法在怀来地区的适用性研究[J].气象,2016,42(11):1395-1401.
    [26]Jin H,Zhong F W,Sheng X G.Simulation of water dynamics of farmland in the piedmont plain of the Taihang Mountains in the North China Plain[J].Procedia Engineering,2011,12(1):66-73.
    [27]刘莹,陈报章,陈婧,等.千烟洲森林生态系统蒸散发模拟模型的适用性[J].植物学报,2016,51(2):226-234.
    [28]符娜,宋孝玉,夏露,等.云南省不同生态水文分区参考作物蒸散量算法适用性评价[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(5):208-217.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700