研究生收费政策与奖助体系对研究生学业影响研究
|
摘要
我国研究生收费政策实施已有四年,通过对研究生收费政策对研究生学业影响展开调研,实证分析研究生收费政策对研究生学业的影响、研究生学业投入对学业发展影响、学业参与对研究生学术水平影响。研究发现:研究生收费政策对研究生学业投入具有正向影响;研究生学业投入对研究生学业发展具有正向影响;研究生收费政策对研究生学业发展具有正向影响;研究生学业发展对研究生教育质量具有正向影响;研究生收费政策对研究生教育质量具有正向影响。为了激发研究生潜心求学,增加学习投入,提高研究生学业成就,提升研究生教育质量,要加大对研究生收费政策的深度宣传和指导,创新贫困生资助制度,完善研究生奖助体系,充分发挥研究生收费政策和奖助体系的保障和激励作用。
It has been four years since the implementation of tuition fee policy for postgraduates in China.This study made an empirical analysis on the influence of tuition fee policy and the subsidy system policy on the academic achievement of postgraduates,the influence of postgraduates' academic input on their academic development,and the influence of postgraduates' academic participation on their academic level.The study found that the postgraduate tuition fee policy had a positive impact on the students' academic input;the postgraduates' academic input had a positive impact on their academic development;the postgraduate tuition fee policy had a positive impact on students' academic development;the postgraduates' academic development had a positive impact on the quality of postgraduate education;and the postgraduate tuition fee policy had a positive impact on the quality of postgraduate education.In order to motivate the postgraduates to study attentively,increase the academic input,improve the academic achievement of postgraduates and improve the quality of postgraduate education,we should increase the in-depth publicity of and the guidance to postgraduate tuition fee policy,make innovation in the financial support system of students with financial difficulty,improve the postgraduate award system and give full play to the incentive effect of the policy of the postgraduate tuition fee policies and subsidy system.
It has been four years since the implementation of tuition fee policy for postgraduates in China.This study made an empirical analysis on the influence of tuition fee policy and the subsidy system policy on the academic achievement of postgraduates,the influence of postgraduates' academic input on their academic development,and the influence of postgraduates' academic participation on their academic level.The study found that the postgraduate tuition fee policy had a positive impact on the students' academic input;the postgraduates' academic input had a positive impact on their academic development;the postgraduate tuition fee policy had a positive impact on students' academic development;the postgraduates' academic development had a positive impact on the quality of postgraduate education;and the postgraduate tuition fee policy had a positive impact on the quality of postgraduate education.In order to motivate the postgraduates to study attentively,increase the academic input,improve the academic achievement of postgraduates and improve the quality of postgraduate education,we should increase the in-depth publicity of and the guidance to postgraduate tuition fee policy,make innovation in the financial support system of students with financial difficulty,improve the postgraduate award system and give full play to the incentive effect of the policy of the postgraduate tuition fee policies and subsidy system.
引文
[1]教育部:中国已成为世界排名第二的研究生教育大国[EB/OL].http://www.chinanews.com/gn/2017/12-28/8411424.shtml.2018-07-06.
[2]康永刚,许玉镇,杨洲.导师在研究生思想政治教育中的作用及其制度建构[J].思想教育研究,2010(12):103-106.
[3]王战军.中国研究生教育质量年度报告[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,2017:1.
[4]三部门解读关于完善研究生教育投入机制的意见[EB/OL].http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2013-03/02/content_2343134.htm.2018-07-06.
[5]高等学校学生资助政策简介(研究生)[EB/OL].http://www.moe.edu.cn/jyb_zwfw/zwfw_fwxx/zhfu_zz/201606/t20160613_266504.html.2016-06-13/2018-01-16.
[6]WILSON.Metaphors for instruction:Why we talk a-bout learning environments[J].Educational Technolo-gy,1995(9-10):25-30.
[7]CABRERA A.,STAMPEN J.,HANSEN W.Exploringthe effects of ability to pay on persistence in college[J].Review of Higher Education,1990,13(3):303-335.
[8]赵必华.大学生学习成效影响因素的调查研究———基于35所本科院校的数据[J].高教探索,2017(11):36-44.
[9]CABRERA,A.,NORA,A.,&CASTANEDA,M.B.“College Persistence:Structural Equations ModelingTest of an Integrated Model of Student Retention”[J].The Journal of Higher Education 2,1993:123-139.
[10]龙琪,倪娟.美国大学生学习影响力模型述评[J].复旦教育论坛,2015(5):47-54.
[11]陈琼琼.大学生参与度评价:高教质量评估的新视角———美国“全国学生参与度调查”的解析[J].高教发展与评估,2009(1):24-30,121.
[12]韩映雄.研究生培养机制改革真的促进了学生学习吗?[J].复旦教育论坛,2010(5):59-62.
[13]GRIVES J E,WEMMERUS V.Developing models ofgraduate student degree progress[J].Journal of HigherEducation,1988(59):163-189.
[14]李茜.研究生全面收费政策与学业成就的关系模型及影响机制研究[D/OL].武汉:华中农业大学,2017:14.
[15]ANDRIEU,S.C.,JOHN,E.P.The influence of prices ongraduate student persistence[J].Research in HigherEducation,1993,34(4),399-425.
[16]赵媛.研究生资助政策对全日制硕士生学习投入的影响研究[D/OL].西安:西安外国语大学,2016:9.
[17]EHRENBERG,R,MAVROS,P.Do doctoral students'financial support patterns affect their times-to-degreeand completion probabilities?[J].Journal of HumanResources,1995,30(3),581-609.
[18]EARL-NOVELL S.Determining the extent to whichprogram structure features and integration mechanismsfacilitate or impede doctoral student persistence inMathematics[J].International Journal of Doctoral Stud-ies,2006(1):45-57.
[19]刘文娟,李芳敏.资助对研究生学业成就影响机制的实证研究评述[J].学位与研究生教育,2014(6):43-48.
[20]杨希.学生资助对学业发展效果的评估方法综述[J].中国高等教育评估,2012(3):16-21.
[21]彭安臣,沈红.博士生资助与博士生培养质量———基于12所大学问卷调查数据的实证分析[J].学位与研究生教育,2012(7):53-60.
[22]财政部,教育部.关于印发《研究生国家奖学金管理暂行办法》的通知:财教[2012]342号[EB/OL].http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2012-10/22/content_2248589.htm.2012-09-29/2018-08-18.
[23]财政部,教育部.关于印发《研究生学业奖学金管理暂行办法》的通知:财教[2013]219号[EB/OL].http://jkw.mof.gov.cn/zhengwuxinxi/zhengcefabu/201308/t20130812_976562.html.2013-07-29/2018-08-18.
[24]徐秀云,何建中.高校学生资助体系现状、问题和对策[J].上海理工大学学报(社会科学版),2006(3):21-25.
[25]王平.我国高校贫困学生新资助体系的实施现状及对策[J].当代教育论坛(上半月刊),2009(6):59-61.
[26]李永红,洪书生.研究生教育质量研究的梳理及界定[J].教育学术月刊,2009(7):35-37.
[27]王孙禺,袁本涛,赵伟.我国研究生教育质量状况综合调研报告[J].中国高等教育,2007(9):32-35.
[28]张小波.基于综合评价的研究生教育质量效率指数研究———对“985工程”一期34所高校的实证分析[J].中国高教研究,2013(9):68-75.
[29]2016年中国研究生教育评价指标体系[EB/OL].ht-tp://www.nseac.com/html/216/677411.html.2018-09-06.
[30]徐英,李天悦.发展型资助:新时代高校学生资助发展的新维度[J].教育评论,2018(2):23-27.
[31]杜坤林.从保障型资助到发展型资助:高校助学工作范式转换及其实践[J].中国高教研究,2012(5):85-88.
[32]刘家祥.高校贫困生资助政策的价值逻辑[J].江苏高教,2018(4):80-84.
[2]康永刚,许玉镇,杨洲.导师在研究生思想政治教育中的作用及其制度建构[J].思想教育研究,2010(12):103-106.
[3]王战军.中国研究生教育质量年度报告[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,2017:1.
[4]三部门解读关于完善研究生教育投入机制的意见[EB/OL].http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2013-03/02/content_2343134.htm.2018-07-06.
[5]高等学校学生资助政策简介(研究生)[EB/OL].http://www.moe.edu.cn/jyb_zwfw/zwfw_fwxx/zhfu_zz/201606/t20160613_266504.html.2016-06-13/2018-01-16.
[6]WILSON.Metaphors for instruction:Why we talk a-bout learning environments[J].Educational Technolo-gy,1995(9-10):25-30.
[7]CABRERA A.,STAMPEN J.,HANSEN W.Exploringthe effects of ability to pay on persistence in college[J].Review of Higher Education,1990,13(3):303-335.
[8]赵必华.大学生学习成效影响因素的调查研究———基于35所本科院校的数据[J].高教探索,2017(11):36-44.
[9]CABRERA,A.,NORA,A.,&CASTANEDA,M.B.“College Persistence:Structural Equations ModelingTest of an Integrated Model of Student Retention”[J].The Journal of Higher Education 2,1993:123-139.
[10]龙琪,倪娟.美国大学生学习影响力模型述评[J].复旦教育论坛,2015(5):47-54.
[11]陈琼琼.大学生参与度评价:高教质量评估的新视角———美国“全国学生参与度调查”的解析[J].高教发展与评估,2009(1):24-30,121.
[12]韩映雄.研究生培养机制改革真的促进了学生学习吗?[J].复旦教育论坛,2010(5):59-62.
[13]GRIVES J E,WEMMERUS V.Developing models ofgraduate student degree progress[J].Journal of HigherEducation,1988(59):163-189.
[14]李茜.研究生全面收费政策与学业成就的关系模型及影响机制研究[D/OL].武汉:华中农业大学,2017:14.
[15]ANDRIEU,S.C.,JOHN,E.P.The influence of prices ongraduate student persistence[J].Research in HigherEducation,1993,34(4),399-425.
[16]赵媛.研究生资助政策对全日制硕士生学习投入的影响研究[D/OL].西安:西安外国语大学,2016:9.
[17]EHRENBERG,R,MAVROS,P.Do doctoral students'financial support patterns affect their times-to-degreeand completion probabilities?[J].Journal of HumanResources,1995,30(3),581-609.
[18]EARL-NOVELL S.Determining the extent to whichprogram structure features and integration mechanismsfacilitate or impede doctoral student persistence inMathematics[J].International Journal of Doctoral Stud-ies,2006(1):45-57.
[19]刘文娟,李芳敏.资助对研究生学业成就影响机制的实证研究评述[J].学位与研究生教育,2014(6):43-48.
[20]杨希.学生资助对学业发展效果的评估方法综述[J].中国高等教育评估,2012(3):16-21.
[21]彭安臣,沈红.博士生资助与博士生培养质量———基于12所大学问卷调查数据的实证分析[J].学位与研究生教育,2012(7):53-60.
[22]财政部,教育部.关于印发《研究生国家奖学金管理暂行办法》的通知:财教[2012]342号[EB/OL].http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2012-10/22/content_2248589.htm.2012-09-29/2018-08-18.
[23]财政部,教育部.关于印发《研究生学业奖学金管理暂行办法》的通知:财教[2013]219号[EB/OL].http://jkw.mof.gov.cn/zhengwuxinxi/zhengcefabu/201308/t20130812_976562.html.2013-07-29/2018-08-18.
[24]徐秀云,何建中.高校学生资助体系现状、问题和对策[J].上海理工大学学报(社会科学版),2006(3):21-25.
[25]王平.我国高校贫困学生新资助体系的实施现状及对策[J].当代教育论坛(上半月刊),2009(6):59-61.
[26]李永红,洪书生.研究生教育质量研究的梳理及界定[J].教育学术月刊,2009(7):35-37.
[27]王孙禺,袁本涛,赵伟.我国研究生教育质量状况综合调研报告[J].中国高等教育,2007(9):32-35.
[28]张小波.基于综合评价的研究生教育质量效率指数研究———对“985工程”一期34所高校的实证分析[J].中国高教研究,2013(9):68-75.
[29]2016年中国研究生教育评价指标体系[EB/OL].ht-tp://www.nseac.com/html/216/677411.html.2018-09-06.
[30]徐英,李天悦.发展型资助:新时代高校学生资助发展的新维度[J].教育评论,2018(2):23-27.
[31]杜坤林.从保障型资助到发展型资助:高校助学工作范式转换及其实践[J].中国高教研究,2012(5):85-88.
[32]刘家祥.高校贫困生资助政策的价值逻辑[J].江苏高教,2018(4):80-84.