超高填方明洞采用双层衬砌型式的可行性研究
|
摘要
高填方明洞衬砌厚度常超过2 m,工后受水化放热影响易产生收缩裂缝并影响结构安全,故提出采用双层衬砌设计形式来降低水化热影响。以重庆丰都高填方明洞为研究背景,采用数值模拟方法研究了双层衬砌明洞的水化热及安全性,并探讨外衬与内衬厚度比例对结构的影响,结果表明:(1)双层衬砌结构可明显减少水化热释放,在各种层厚比下,衬砌工后内部温度最高降幅达到38%,温度应力极值的降幅可达53%;(2)相比整体式衬砌,双层衬砌设计基本不影响结构安全性;(3)双层衬砌的层厚比对结构的安全性影响极小,最大影响程度仅有2%;(4)推荐采用1∶1的外衬内衬厚度比,可在不影响安全性的前提下最大程度降低水化热影响。
The thickness of monolithic lining adopted in high-fill open cut tunnel is often over 2 m and may result in cracks due to hydraulic heat and affects the structure safety. The bi-layer lining is specifically proposed to solve this problem. Based on a high-fill open cut tunnel in Fengdu,the hydration heat of bi-layer lining and its safety are analyzed by way of numerical analysis and the influence of the thickness ratio between the outer lining and the inner lining on the hydration heat and the safety of lining are also analyzed. The conclusions are as follows:( 1) bi-layer lining receives much less hydration heat than monolithic lining,the limit temperature stress increase my reach 38% and the limit temperature stress decrease 53%;( 2) compared with the monolithic lining,the bi-layer lining imposes almost no impact on the structure safety;( 3) the thickness ratio of bi-layer lining does little impact on the safety of structure,and the maximum impact is only 2%;( 4) the thickness ratio of outer and inner lining is suggested to be 1 ∶ 1 to offer maximum hydration heat reduction and maintain the safety of lining at the same time.
The thickness of monolithic lining adopted in high-fill open cut tunnel is often over 2 m and may result in cracks due to hydraulic heat and affects the structure safety. The bi-layer lining is specifically proposed to solve this problem. Based on a high-fill open cut tunnel in Fengdu,the hydration heat of bi-layer lining and its safety are analyzed by way of numerical analysis and the influence of the thickness ratio between the outer lining and the inner lining on the hydration heat and the safety of lining are also analyzed. The conclusions are as follows:( 1) bi-layer lining receives much less hydration heat than monolithic lining,the limit temperature stress increase my reach 38% and the limit temperature stress decrease 53%;( 2) compared with the monolithic lining,the bi-layer lining imposes almost no impact on the structure safety;( 3) the thickness ratio of bi-layer lining does little impact on the safety of structure,and the maximum impact is only 2%;( 4) the thickness ratio of outer and inner lining is suggested to be 1 ∶ 1 to offer maximum hydration heat reduction and maintain the safety of lining at the same time.
引文
[1]赵鹏.黄土高填方明洞土压力减载及力学特性研究[D].兰州:兰州交通大学,2014.
[2]李盛,马莉,曹亚东.高填土明洞土压力减载计算[J].华中科技大学学报,2013,41(11):58-63.
[3]杨雄,华科,琚国全.超大跨度超高回填荷载明洞衬砌结构选型探讨[J].高速铁路技术,2013,4(3):47-53.
[4]毛金龙.明洞二次高填方护拱方案设计及数值模拟计算[J].科技信息,2012(3):509-510.
[5]王友才.大体积混凝土水泥水化热施工冷却技术[J].铁道标准设计,2003(10):53-54.
[6]李进洲,王远立.沪通长江大桥承台大体积混凝土动态设计养护技术研究[J].铁道标准设计,2016,60(2):93-99.
[7]孙小猛,徐登云.基于多目标优化的大体积混凝土承台冷却水管布置研究[J].铁道标准设计,2014,58(5):74-77.
[8]孙金更.铁路箱梁静载试验开裂原因分析及控制措施[J].铁道标准设计,2015,59(7):84-88.
[9]中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.GB50496—2009大体积混凝土施工规范[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2009.
[10]王龙甫.弹性理论[M].北京:科学出版社,1984.
[11]崔溦,陈王,王宁.考虑性态变化的早期混凝土热湿力耦合分析及其应用[J].土木工程学报,2015(2):44-53.
[12]田亚护,沈宇鹏,隗新宇,等.多年冻土区路基U型水沟热力耦合理论分析及现场试验[J].铁道学报,2015,37(7):92-97.
[13]刘勇军.水管冷却计算的部分自适应精度法[J].水利水电技术,2003,34(7):33-35.
[14]禚一,李忠献,王菲.桥梁地震碰撞分析中不同接触单元模型的对比分析[J].工程力学,2014,31(3):11-17.
[15]刘红.桩土相互作用接触单元研究[D].重庆:重庆交通大学,2013.
[16]铁道第二勘察设计院.TB10003—2005铁路隧道设计规范[S].北京:中国铁道出版社,2005.
[2]李盛,马莉,曹亚东.高填土明洞土压力减载计算[J].华中科技大学学报,2013,41(11):58-63.
[3]杨雄,华科,琚国全.超大跨度超高回填荷载明洞衬砌结构选型探讨[J].高速铁路技术,2013,4(3):47-53.
[4]毛金龙.明洞二次高填方护拱方案设计及数值模拟计算[J].科技信息,2012(3):509-510.
[5]王友才.大体积混凝土水泥水化热施工冷却技术[J].铁道标准设计,2003(10):53-54.
[6]李进洲,王远立.沪通长江大桥承台大体积混凝土动态设计养护技术研究[J].铁道标准设计,2016,60(2):93-99.
[7]孙小猛,徐登云.基于多目标优化的大体积混凝土承台冷却水管布置研究[J].铁道标准设计,2014,58(5):74-77.
[8]孙金更.铁路箱梁静载试验开裂原因分析及控制措施[J].铁道标准设计,2015,59(7):84-88.
[9]中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.GB50496—2009大体积混凝土施工规范[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2009.
[10]王龙甫.弹性理论[M].北京:科学出版社,1984.
[11]崔溦,陈王,王宁.考虑性态变化的早期混凝土热湿力耦合分析及其应用[J].土木工程学报,2015(2):44-53.
[12]田亚护,沈宇鹏,隗新宇,等.多年冻土区路基U型水沟热力耦合理论分析及现场试验[J].铁道学报,2015,37(7):92-97.
[13]刘勇军.水管冷却计算的部分自适应精度法[J].水利水电技术,2003,34(7):33-35.
[14]禚一,李忠献,王菲.桥梁地震碰撞分析中不同接触单元模型的对比分析[J].工程力学,2014,31(3):11-17.
[15]刘红.桩土相互作用接触单元研究[D].重庆:重庆交通大学,2013.
[16]铁道第二勘察设计院.TB10003—2005铁路隧道设计规范[S].北京:中国铁道出版社,2005.