我国跨域治理研究:生成逻辑、机制及路径
|
摘要
我国跨域公共治理问题持续涌现,在客观上挑战政府的治理结构与治理能力。发轫于西方治理实践的跨域治理为跨域公共问题提供了有力解释,并逐渐成为跨域公共事务求解之道。围绕跨域治理题域,我国学界开展一系列研究,但较少有对跨域治理研究成果进行元分析或系统梳理与评估,这在一定程度上限制了跨域治理知识的再生产与可拓展维度。通过对近年来国内跨域治理相关研究的系统梳理,可以展现当下我国跨域治理研究的整体概貌。研究发现,既有研究在概念等理论层面存在分歧;跨域治理生成逻辑存在多种竞争性解释;域外理论框架主导治理机制研究;研究路径相对单一等。未来研究应聚焦跨域治理理论体系建构、审视环境系络差异和理论适用性、反思跨域治理的生成逻辑、创新研究方法,尤其要着力探讨跨域公共事务多种可能的治理方式。
The continuous emergence of cross-domain problems challenges the structure and capacity of government. Cross-domain governance, which originated from western governance practices, provides a powerful explanation for cross-domain public issues and gradually becomes the solution to cross-domain public affairs. A series of studies have been carried out in China, but there are few meta-analyses or systematic evaluation of the research results of cross-domain governance, which to some extent limits the reproduction and extendable dimensions of cross-domain governance knowledge. By systematizing the existing studies, we can know the general situation of the researches on cross-domain governance in China. It is found that there are differences in the concept and other theoretical aspects of existing studies. There are many competitive interpretations of cross-domain governance generation logic, research on governance mechanism is guided by the foreign theory framework, and the research approach is relatively unitary. Future research should focus on the construction of the theoretical system of cross-domain governance, examine the differences of environmental systems and theoretical applicability, reflect on the generation logic of cross-domain governance, innovate the research methods, and especially focus on exploring various possible governance modes of cross-domain public affairs.
The continuous emergence of cross-domain problems challenges the structure and capacity of government. Cross-domain governance, which originated from western governance practices, provides a powerful explanation for cross-domain public issues and gradually becomes the solution to cross-domain public affairs. A series of studies have been carried out in China, but there are few meta-analyses or systematic evaluation of the research results of cross-domain governance, which to some extent limits the reproduction and extendable dimensions of cross-domain governance knowledge. By systematizing the existing studies, we can know the general situation of the researches on cross-domain governance in China. It is found that there are differences in the concept and other theoretical aspects of existing studies. There are many competitive interpretations of cross-domain governance generation logic, research on governance mechanism is guided by the foreign theory framework, and the research approach is relatively unitary. Future research should focus on the construction of the theoretical system of cross-domain governance, examine the differences of environmental systems and theoretical applicability, reflect on the generation logic of cross-domain governance, innovate the research methods, and especially focus on exploring various possible governance modes of cross-domain public affairs.
引文
[1]曼瑟·奥尔森.集体行动的逻辑[M].陈郁,等,译.上海:格致出版社,上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,2014:2-3.
[2]OLSON M. The Logic of Collective Action:Public Goods and the Theory of Groups[M]. Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1971:2.
[3]HARDIN G. The Tragedy of the Commons[J]. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research,2009,1(3):243-253.
[4]WADE R. The Management of Common Property Resources:Collective Action as an Alternative to Privatisation or State Regulation[J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics,1987,11(2):95-106.
[5]埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆.公共事务的治理之道——集体行动制度的演进[M].余逊达,陈旭东,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2012:278.
[6]TAIJUN J. From Administering Administrative Districts to Regional Public Administration:A Game Theory Analysis of the Evolution of Governmental Forms of Governance[J].Social Sciences in China,2007,(6):53-65,205.
[7]HILL M&HUPE P. Analysing Policy Processes as Multiple Governance:Accountability in Social Policy[J]. Policy&Politics,2006,34(3):557-573.
[8]CHARLES T. A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures[J].The Journal of Political Economy,1956,(5):416-424.
[9]BANGDIWALA S I,PAULA C S,RAMIRO L S,et al.Coordination of International Multicenter Studies:Governance and Administrative Structure[J]. Salud Pública de México,2003,45(1):58-66.
[10]赵永茂,等.府际关系:新兴研究议题与治理策略[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2012:233.
[11]纪俊臣.都市及区域治理[M].台北:五南图书出版公司,2006:169.
[12]林水波,李长晏.跨域治理[M].台北:五南图书出版公司,2005:3.
[13]张成福,等.跨域治理:模式、机制与困境[J].中国行政管理,2012,(3):102-109.
[14]朱春奎,申剑敏.地方政府跨域治理的ISGPO模型[J].南开学报:哲学社会科学版,2015,(6):49-56.
[15]丁煌,叶汉雄.论跨域治理多元主体间伙伴关系的构建[J].南京社会科学,2013,(1):63-70.
[16]刘祺.理解跨界治理:概念缘起、内容解析及理论谱系[J].科学社会主义,2017,(4):95-100.
[17]郑文强,刘滢.政府间合作研究的评述[J].公共行政评论,2014,(6):107-128,165-166.
[18]PFEFFER J&SALANCIK G R. The External Control of Organizations:A Resource Dependence Perspective[M].Redwood City,CA:Stanford University Press,2003:13-16.
[19]YIN X. Regional Economic Integration in China:Incentive,Pattern,and Growth effect[J]. for Hong Kong Meeting in Economic Demography,2003,(12):15-16.
[20]汪伟全.论地方政府间合作的最新进展[J].探索与争鸣,2010,(10):51-53.
[21]陈瑞莲,杨爱平.从区域公共管理到区域治理研究:历史的转型[J].南开学报:哲学社会科学版,2012,(2):48-57.
[22]王佃利,杨妮.跨域治理在区域发展中的适用性及局限[J].南开学报:哲学社会科学版,2014,(2):103-109.
[23]孙柏瑛,于扬铭.网格化管理模式再审视[J].南京社会科学,2015,(4):65-71,79.
[24]林尚立.国内政府间关系[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,1998:24.
[25]马学广,等.从行政分权到跨域治理:我国地方政府治理方式变革研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2008,(1):50-55.
[26]锁利铭.地方政府间正式与非正式协作机制的形成与演变[J].地方治理研究,2018,(1):25-39,79.
[27]锁利铭,等.区域环境治理中的双边合作与多边协调——基于2003—2015年泛珠三角协议的分析[J].复旦公共行政评论,2017,(1):149-172.
[28]邢华.我国区域合作治理困境与纵向嵌入式治理机制选择[J].政治学研究,2014,(5):37-50.
[29]朱成燕.内源式政府间合作机制的构建与区域治理[J].学习与实践,2016,(8):55-62.
[30]PFEFFER J&SALANCIK G R. The External Control of Organizations:A Resource Dependence Perspective[M].Redwood City,CA:Stanford University Press,2003:39.
[31]傅永超,徐晓林.府际管理理论与长株潭城市群政府合作机制[J].公共管理学报,2007(2):24-29,122.
[32]汪伟全.空气污染的跨域合作治理研究——以北京地区为例[J].公共管理学报,2014,(1):55-64,140.
[33]武俊伟.京津冀府际协同治理动力机制研究[D].长沙:湖南大学硕士学位论文,2017.
[34]赵新峰,李水金.蓝色经济区地方政府跨域治理的困境及其克服——以山东半岛为个案[J].行政论坛,2013,(1):37-40.
[35]刘云甫,朱最新.论区域府际合作治理与区域行政法[J].南京社会科学,2016,(8):82-87.
[36]杨志云,毛寿龙.制度环境、激励约束与区域政府间合作——京津冀协同发展的个案追踪[J].国家行政学院学报,2017,(2):97-102.
[37]谢宝剑,高洁儒.泛珠三角区域合作的制度演化分析[J].北京行政学院学报,2015,(3):16-24.
[38]方雷.地方政府间跨区域合作治理的行政制度供给[J].理论探讨,2014,(1):19-23.
[39]罗伯特D·帕特南.使民主运转起来[M].南昌:江西人民出版社,2001:8.
[40]锁利铭.我国地方政府区域合作模型研究——基于制度分析视角[J].经济体制改革,2014,(2):25-29.
[41]金太军,沈承诚.区域公共管理制度创新困境的内在机理探究——基于新制度经济学视角的考量[J].中国行政管理,2007,(3):99-102.
[42]何俊志.结构、历史与行为——历史制度主义的分析范式[J].国外社会科学,2002,(5):25-33.
[43]赵凯.演化经济学的结构—过程分析法及其启示[J].学术研究,2005,(2):44-48.
[44]马捷,等.从合作区到区域合作网络:结构、路径与演进——来自“9+2”合作区191项府际协议的网络分析[J].中国软科学,2014,(12):71-92.
[45]申剑敏,朱春奎.跨域治理的概念谱系与研究模型[J].北京行政学院学报,2015,(4):38-43.
[46]曹堂哲.政府跨域治理协同分析模型[J].中共浙江省委党校学报,2015,(2):33-39.
[47]冯静,杨志云.利益视角下的公共政策过程分析[J].中国行政管理,2009,(1):26-30.
[48]ANSELL C&GASH A. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2008,18(4):543-571.
[49]SHUE V. The Reach of the State:Sketches of the Chinese Body Politic[M]. Redwood City,CA:Stanford University Press,1990:148.
[50]荣敬本,等.从压力型体制向民主合作体制的转变:县乡两级政治体制改革[M].北京:中央编译出版社,1998:28.
[51]周黎安.行政发包制[J].社会,2014,(6):1-38.
[52]娄成武,于东山.西方国家跨界治理的内在动力、典型模式与实现路径[J].行政论坛,2011,(1):88-91.
[2]OLSON M. The Logic of Collective Action:Public Goods and the Theory of Groups[M]. Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1971:2.
[3]HARDIN G. The Tragedy of the Commons[J]. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research,2009,1(3):243-253.
[4]WADE R. The Management of Common Property Resources:Collective Action as an Alternative to Privatisation or State Regulation[J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics,1987,11(2):95-106.
[5]埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆.公共事务的治理之道——集体行动制度的演进[M].余逊达,陈旭东,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2012:278.
[6]TAIJUN J. From Administering Administrative Districts to Regional Public Administration:A Game Theory Analysis of the Evolution of Governmental Forms of Governance[J].Social Sciences in China,2007,(6):53-65,205.
[7]HILL M&HUPE P. Analysing Policy Processes as Multiple Governance:Accountability in Social Policy[J]. Policy&Politics,2006,34(3):557-573.
[8]CHARLES T. A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures[J].The Journal of Political Economy,1956,(5):416-424.
[9]BANGDIWALA S I,PAULA C S,RAMIRO L S,et al.Coordination of International Multicenter Studies:Governance and Administrative Structure[J]. Salud Pública de México,2003,45(1):58-66.
[10]赵永茂,等.府际关系:新兴研究议题与治理策略[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2012:233.
[11]纪俊臣.都市及区域治理[M].台北:五南图书出版公司,2006:169.
[12]林水波,李长晏.跨域治理[M].台北:五南图书出版公司,2005:3.
[13]张成福,等.跨域治理:模式、机制与困境[J].中国行政管理,2012,(3):102-109.
[14]朱春奎,申剑敏.地方政府跨域治理的ISGPO模型[J].南开学报:哲学社会科学版,2015,(6):49-56.
[15]丁煌,叶汉雄.论跨域治理多元主体间伙伴关系的构建[J].南京社会科学,2013,(1):63-70.
[16]刘祺.理解跨界治理:概念缘起、内容解析及理论谱系[J].科学社会主义,2017,(4):95-100.
[17]郑文强,刘滢.政府间合作研究的评述[J].公共行政评论,2014,(6):107-128,165-166.
[18]PFEFFER J&SALANCIK G R. The External Control of Organizations:A Resource Dependence Perspective[M].Redwood City,CA:Stanford University Press,2003:13-16.
[19]YIN X. Regional Economic Integration in China:Incentive,Pattern,and Growth effect[J]. for Hong Kong Meeting in Economic Demography,2003,(12):15-16.
[20]汪伟全.论地方政府间合作的最新进展[J].探索与争鸣,2010,(10):51-53.
[21]陈瑞莲,杨爱平.从区域公共管理到区域治理研究:历史的转型[J].南开学报:哲学社会科学版,2012,(2):48-57.
[22]王佃利,杨妮.跨域治理在区域发展中的适用性及局限[J].南开学报:哲学社会科学版,2014,(2):103-109.
[23]孙柏瑛,于扬铭.网格化管理模式再审视[J].南京社会科学,2015,(4):65-71,79.
[24]林尚立.国内政府间关系[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,1998:24.
[25]马学广,等.从行政分权到跨域治理:我国地方政府治理方式变革研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2008,(1):50-55.
[26]锁利铭.地方政府间正式与非正式协作机制的形成与演变[J].地方治理研究,2018,(1):25-39,79.
[27]锁利铭,等.区域环境治理中的双边合作与多边协调——基于2003—2015年泛珠三角协议的分析[J].复旦公共行政评论,2017,(1):149-172.
[28]邢华.我国区域合作治理困境与纵向嵌入式治理机制选择[J].政治学研究,2014,(5):37-50.
[29]朱成燕.内源式政府间合作机制的构建与区域治理[J].学习与实践,2016,(8):55-62.
[30]PFEFFER J&SALANCIK G R. The External Control of Organizations:A Resource Dependence Perspective[M].Redwood City,CA:Stanford University Press,2003:39.
[31]傅永超,徐晓林.府际管理理论与长株潭城市群政府合作机制[J].公共管理学报,2007(2):24-29,122.
[32]汪伟全.空气污染的跨域合作治理研究——以北京地区为例[J].公共管理学报,2014,(1):55-64,140.
[33]武俊伟.京津冀府际协同治理动力机制研究[D].长沙:湖南大学硕士学位论文,2017.
[34]赵新峰,李水金.蓝色经济区地方政府跨域治理的困境及其克服——以山东半岛为个案[J].行政论坛,2013,(1):37-40.
[35]刘云甫,朱最新.论区域府际合作治理与区域行政法[J].南京社会科学,2016,(8):82-87.
[36]杨志云,毛寿龙.制度环境、激励约束与区域政府间合作——京津冀协同发展的个案追踪[J].国家行政学院学报,2017,(2):97-102.
[37]谢宝剑,高洁儒.泛珠三角区域合作的制度演化分析[J].北京行政学院学报,2015,(3):16-24.
[38]方雷.地方政府间跨区域合作治理的行政制度供给[J].理论探讨,2014,(1):19-23.
[39]罗伯特D·帕特南.使民主运转起来[M].南昌:江西人民出版社,2001:8.
[40]锁利铭.我国地方政府区域合作模型研究——基于制度分析视角[J].经济体制改革,2014,(2):25-29.
[41]金太军,沈承诚.区域公共管理制度创新困境的内在机理探究——基于新制度经济学视角的考量[J].中国行政管理,2007,(3):99-102.
[42]何俊志.结构、历史与行为——历史制度主义的分析范式[J].国外社会科学,2002,(5):25-33.
[43]赵凯.演化经济学的结构—过程分析法及其启示[J].学术研究,2005,(2):44-48.
[44]马捷,等.从合作区到区域合作网络:结构、路径与演进——来自“9+2”合作区191项府际协议的网络分析[J].中国软科学,2014,(12):71-92.
[45]申剑敏,朱春奎.跨域治理的概念谱系与研究模型[J].北京行政学院学报,2015,(4):38-43.
[46]曹堂哲.政府跨域治理协同分析模型[J].中共浙江省委党校学报,2015,(2):33-39.
[47]冯静,杨志云.利益视角下的公共政策过程分析[J].中国行政管理,2009,(1):26-30.
[48]ANSELL C&GASH A. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2008,18(4):543-571.
[49]SHUE V. The Reach of the State:Sketches of the Chinese Body Politic[M]. Redwood City,CA:Stanford University Press,1990:148.
[50]荣敬本,等.从压力型体制向民主合作体制的转变:县乡两级政治体制改革[M].北京:中央编译出版社,1998:28.
[51]周黎安.行政发包制[J].社会,2014,(6):1-38.
[52]娄成武,于东山.西方国家跨界治理的内在动力、典型模式与实现路径[J].行政论坛,2011,(1):88-91.