论阻碍马克思主义科技创新思想研究推进的原因及对策——兼评《创新驱动发展与资本逻辑》
|
摘要
在中国推进创新驱动发展战略的新时代,马克思主义科技创新思想研究必须推进。《创新驱动发展与资本逻辑》指出了阻碍马克思主义科技创新思想研究推进的两重原因,同时给出了相应的对策。而以中国传统哲学思想的理解惯性、西学东渐的历史经验惯性、中国马克思主义的研究方式惯性为内容的历史文化思维惯性同样是阻碍马克思主义科技创新思想研究推进的重要原因。只有突破这三种历史文化思维惯性,马克思主义科技创新思想研究才能更好推进,从而为创新驱动发展战略提供更多的理论支持。
In the new era of promoting innovation-driven development in China, the study of Marxist thought of scientific and technological innovation must be promoted. Innovation-Driven Development and Capital Logic points out the dual reasons that hinder the advancement of Marxist thought of scientific and technological innovation, and offers corresponding countermeasures to these problems. The inertia of historical and cultural thinking, which includes the understanding inertia of traditional Chinese philosophical thought, the historical experience inertia of the eastward spread of Western learning and the inertia of the research mode of Chinese Marxism, is also an important reason that hinders the advancement of the research of Marxist thought of scientific and technological innovation. Only by breaking through the inertia of these three kinds of historical and cultural thinking, can the study of Marxist thought of scientific and technological innovation be better promoted, thus providing more theoretical support for innovation-driven development strategy.
In the new era of promoting innovation-driven development in China, the study of Marxist thought of scientific and technological innovation must be promoted. Innovation-Driven Development and Capital Logic points out the dual reasons that hinder the advancement of Marxist thought of scientific and technological innovation, and offers corresponding countermeasures to these problems. The inertia of historical and cultural thinking, which includes the understanding inertia of traditional Chinese philosophical thought, the historical experience inertia of the eastward spread of Western learning and the inertia of the research mode of Chinese Marxism, is also an important reason that hinders the advancement of the research of Marxist thought of scientific and technological innovation. Only by breaking through the inertia of these three kinds of historical and cultural thinking, can the study of Marxist thought of scientific and technological innovation be better promoted, thus providing more theoretical support for innovation-driven development strategy.
引文
[1] 王伯鲁.马克思技术思想纲要[M].北京:科学出版社,2009:22.
[2] 乔瑞金.马克思技术哲学纲要[M].北京:人民出版社,2002:20.
[3] 潘恩荣.创新驱动发展与资本逻辑[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2016:37-38.
[4] 郭喨,盛晓明.新工具与实验哲学的未来[J].自然辩证法研究,2014(7):9-14.
[5] 李承贵.科学视域下的中国传统哲学特点[J].中共宁波市委党校学报,2016(6):53-58.
[6] 张岱年.中国哲学大纲[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1982:5-8.
[7] 金岳霖.金岳霖选集[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,2005:67.
[8] 李存山.中国哲学的特点与中华民族精神[J].哲学研究,2014(12):36-44.
[9] 李承贵.试论中国哲学的五大特质[J].学术研究,2015(3):9-14.
[10] 尹晶晶,孙涛.洋务运动时期两种科技观的解读[J].自然辩证法研究,2015(4):72-77.
[11] 中国史学会.洋务运动:一册[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1961:134.
[12] 中国史学会.洋务运动:二册[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1961:30.
[13] 张礼恒.中国早期现代化运动的成功与失败:以洋务运动为中心的历史考察[J].东岳论丛,2010(4):135-140.
[14] 任阿娟,张仲华.马克思主义哲学与中国社会变革:纪念艾思奇《大众哲学》发表70周年[J].昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版),2006(3):1-4.
[15] 王如鹏,孔扬.从辩证法的“合理形态”理解马克思主义三大组成部分的统一[J].河南社会科学,2015(3):123-124.
[2] 乔瑞金.马克思技术哲学纲要[M].北京:人民出版社,2002:20.
[3] 潘恩荣.创新驱动发展与资本逻辑[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2016:37-38.
[4] 郭喨,盛晓明.新工具与实验哲学的未来[J].自然辩证法研究,2014(7):9-14.
[5] 李承贵.科学视域下的中国传统哲学特点[J].中共宁波市委党校学报,2016(6):53-58.
[6] 张岱年.中国哲学大纲[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1982:5-8.
[7] 金岳霖.金岳霖选集[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,2005:67.
[8] 李存山.中国哲学的特点与中华民族精神[J].哲学研究,2014(12):36-44.
[9] 李承贵.试论中国哲学的五大特质[J].学术研究,2015(3):9-14.
[10] 尹晶晶,孙涛.洋务运动时期两种科技观的解读[J].自然辩证法研究,2015(4):72-77.
[11] 中国史学会.洋务运动:一册[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1961:134.
[12] 中国史学会.洋务运动:二册[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1961:30.
[13] 张礼恒.中国早期现代化运动的成功与失败:以洋务运动为中心的历史考察[J].东岳论丛,2010(4):135-140.
[14] 任阿娟,张仲华.马克思主义哲学与中国社会变革:纪念艾思奇《大众哲学》发表70周年[J].昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版),2006(3):1-4.
[15] 王如鹏,孔扬.从辩证法的“合理形态”理解马克思主义三大组成部分的统一[J].河南社会科学,2015(3):123-124.