聚合平台深度链接行为法律属性研究
|
摘要
借助深度链接技术,聚合平台在不支付版权费的情况下向用户推送来自其他网站的作品。聚合平台不分担被链接网站著作权授权成本的行为是不公平竞争行为,聚合平台的这种做法会导致被链接网站的投入得不到应有的回报,同时也会导致被链接网站访问量减少、用户流失。近年来,由聚合平台深度链接行为引发的网络著作权侵权纠纷日益增多。目前,判断深度链接行为的法律性质主要依照四个标准,分别是服务器标准、用户感知标准、实质性替代标准、实质呈现标准。这种判断无论依照哪种标准作出,都有一定的合理性,也有一定的局限性。在互联网产业快速发展的当下,如果不对深度链接行为进行规制,就无法保护合法经营者的权益。对深度链接行为进行规制,一是要注意发挥法律法规的约束作用,二是要注意发挥行业协会的协调和监督作用。
With the help of deep-linking technology, aggregation platform can push works from other websites to users without paying copyright fees. The aggregation platform does not share the copyright authorization cost of the linked websites, which is unfair competition. The aggregation platform will not only cause the investment of the linked websites not to be rewarded, but also reduce the number of visits to the linked websites and the loss of users. In recent years, the network copyright infringement disputes caused by the aggregation platform deep-linking behavior are increasing. At present, the legal nature of deep-linking behavior is judged mainly according to four standards, namely server standard, user perception standard, substantive substitution standard and substantive presentation standard. whichever criterion is used to judge, there are certain rationality and limitations. With the rapid development of Internet industry, if we do not regulate deep-linking, we cannot protect the rights and interests of legitimate operators.To regulate the deep-linking behavior, we should pay attention to the binding role of laws and regulations, and the coordination and supervision role of trade associations.
With the help of deep-linking technology, aggregation platform can push works from other websites to users without paying copyright fees. The aggregation platform does not share the copyright authorization cost of the linked websites, which is unfair competition. The aggregation platform will not only cause the investment of the linked websites not to be rewarded, but also reduce the number of visits to the linked websites and the loss of users. In recent years, the network copyright infringement disputes caused by the aggregation platform deep-linking behavior are increasing. At present, the legal nature of deep-linking behavior is judged mainly according to four standards, namely server standard, user perception standard, substantive substitution standard and substantive presentation standard. whichever criterion is used to judge, there are certain rationality and limitations. With the rapid development of Internet industry, if we do not regulate deep-linking, we cannot protect the rights and interests of legitimate operators.To regulate the deep-linking behavior, we should pay attention to the binding role of laws and regulations, and the coordination and supervision role of trade associations.
引文
[1]网络聚合应用[EB/OL].[2018-12-12].https://baike.baidu.com/item/网络聚合应用/15545079.
[2]深度链接[EB/OL].[2018-12-12].https://baike.baidu.com/item/深度链接/8271732?fr=aladdin.
[3]谢俞.视频聚合平台中深度链接的法律规制[D].广州:华南理工大学,2016.
[4]王迁.认定信息网络传播行为应采用“服务器标准”[N].检察日报,2017-07-02(3).
[5]全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于修改《中华人民共和国著作权法》的决定(主席令第二十六号)[EB/OL].[2018-12-12].http://www.gov.cn/flfg/2010-02/26/content_1544458.htm.
[6]谢兰芳,付强.深度链接行为的侵权判定标准探讨[J].知识产权,2016(11):41-45.
[7]如何判定网络服务提供者是否侵权[EB/OL].(2016-03-25)[2018-12-12].http://www.ncac.gov.cn/chinacopyright/contents/4509/279517.html.
[8]中国电影集团公司电影营销策划分公司诉广州市千钧网络科技有限公司侵犯著作财产权纠纷案[EB/OL].[2019-02-02].http://www.fsou.com/html/text/fnl/1180686/118068643.html.
[9]芮松艳.实质性替代标准存在的误区[EB/OL].[2018-12-12].http://www.chinaipmagazine.com/journal-show.asp?2537.html.
[10]刘增.影视聚合型APP设链行为的法律定性问题研究:以“腾讯诉快看影视”案为例[J].时代金融(下旬),2017(11):205-206,208.
[11]温捷潇.深层链接“实质呈现标准”合理性探讨[J].北京政法职业学院学报,2018(2):23-27.
[12]刘玉莹.关于聚合链接的司法裁判思路探究[EB/OL].[2019-02-02].http://victory.itslaw.cn/victory/api/v1/articles/article/8a2f13ef-30a1-467c-8353-cd50edc0da91.
[13]中华人民共和国反不正当竞争法(全文)[EB/OL].(2017-11-05)[2018-12-12].http://www.chinanews.com/gn/2017/11-05/8368569.shtml.
[2]深度链接[EB/OL].[2018-12-12].https://baike.baidu.com/item/深度链接/8271732?fr=aladdin.
[3]谢俞.视频聚合平台中深度链接的法律规制[D].广州:华南理工大学,2016.
[4]王迁.认定信息网络传播行为应采用“服务器标准”[N].检察日报,2017-07-02(3).
[5]全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于修改《中华人民共和国著作权法》的决定(主席令第二十六号)[EB/OL].[2018-12-12].http://www.gov.cn/flfg/2010-02/26/content_1544458.htm.
[6]谢兰芳,付强.深度链接行为的侵权判定标准探讨[J].知识产权,2016(11):41-45.
[7]如何判定网络服务提供者是否侵权[EB/OL].(2016-03-25)[2018-12-12].http://www.ncac.gov.cn/chinacopyright/contents/4509/279517.html.
[8]中国电影集团公司电影营销策划分公司诉广州市千钧网络科技有限公司侵犯著作财产权纠纷案[EB/OL].[2019-02-02].http://www.fsou.com/html/text/fnl/1180686/118068643.html.
[9]芮松艳.实质性替代标准存在的误区[EB/OL].[2018-12-12].http://www.chinaipmagazine.com/journal-show.asp?2537.html.
[10]刘增.影视聚合型APP设链行为的法律定性问题研究:以“腾讯诉快看影视”案为例[J].时代金融(下旬),2017(11):205-206,208.
[11]温捷潇.深层链接“实质呈现标准”合理性探讨[J].北京政法职业学院学报,2018(2):23-27.
[12]刘玉莹.关于聚合链接的司法裁判思路探究[EB/OL].[2019-02-02].http://victory.itslaw.cn/victory/api/v1/articles/article/8a2f13ef-30a1-467c-8353-cd50edc0da91.
[13]中华人民共和国反不正当竞争法(全文)[EB/OL].(2017-11-05)[2018-12-12].http://www.chinanews.com/gn/2017/11-05/8368569.shtml.