浅析克林顿主义与北约东扩危机
|
摘要
苏东剧变后突然提升到世界唯一超级大国,美国被"胜利"冲昏头脑,继续在冷战思维支配下,抱定武力天下的权力原则,一意孤行地发展了单边主义,将独霸世界作为美国的战略目标,衍生了20世纪末独具特色的克林顿主义,并使本应消亡的北约成为美国的开路先锋,在世界各地进行扩展战略,引发了新的全球冲突和地区动荡,为21世纪国际合作政治和经济全球化造成了潜在的安全隐患。事实上,克林顿主义和北约东扩既是大国争霸的历史延续,也是西方对社会主义的遏制,但美国全球战略和北约新战略终究是一种政治呓语,不能阻挡经济全球化和政治多元化的时代潮流。
Being proliferated to the world superpower after the drastic changes in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union,the United States was dazzled by the alleged success that it followed decisively the tenets of military supremacy,developed unilateralism arbitrarily and lived to the strategic goal of obtaining global hegemony under the domination of cold war mentality.Followed,the characterized Clinton doctrine of the end of 20 th century was born,which made the NATO,an organization that should have disappeared,the American pioneer of worldwide expansion strategy and aroused new global collision and regional upheavals which caused lurking danger for international cooperation,politics and economic globalization in the 21 st Century.In fact,Clinton Doctrine and eastward expansion of the NATO were not only the historical prolongation of hegemony competition among leading powers,but also western restriction to socialism.However,either American global strategy or the NATO's new strategy is eventually an unrealistic political dream,which can not hinder the temporal tendency of economic globalization and political diversification.
Being proliferated to the world superpower after the drastic changes in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union,the United States was dazzled by the alleged success that it followed decisively the tenets of military supremacy,developed unilateralism arbitrarily and lived to the strategic goal of obtaining global hegemony under the domination of cold war mentality.Followed,the characterized Clinton doctrine of the end of 20 th century was born,which made the NATO,an organization that should have disappeared,the American pioneer of worldwide expansion strategy and aroused new global collision and regional upheavals which caused lurking danger for international cooperation,politics and economic globalization in the 21 st Century.In fact,Clinton Doctrine and eastward expansion of the NATO were not only the historical prolongation of hegemony competition among leading powers,but also western restriction to socialism.However,either American global strategy or the NATO's new strategy is eventually an unrealistic political dream,which can not hinder the temporal tendency of economic globalization and political diversification.
引文
[1]姜宪明,何苗.国际关系与大国战略[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2009.
[2]梅孜编译.美国国家安全战略报告汇编[M].北京:时事出版社,1996.
[3]陈宝森.当代美国经济[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2001.
[4]曹胜强等.二十世纪国际关系史论[M].济南:济南出版社,2001.
[5]邱恩田.北约:从冷战到热战[M].北京:新华出版社,1999.
[6]梁方,李景龙,王吉远.话说北约[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2000.
[7]郝时远.帝国霸权与巴尔干“火药桶”[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,1999.
[8]Michael Doyle, Empire[M].Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1986.
[9]韩克敌.美国与苏联解体[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2011.
[10][俄]E·T·盖达尔.帝国的消亡:当代俄罗斯的教训[M].王尊贤,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008.
[11][俄]麦德维杰夫.苏联的最后一年[M].王晓玉等,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005.
[12][英]雷切尔·沃克.震撼世界的六年[M].张金鉴,译.北京:改革出版社,1999.
[13][俄]戈尔巴乔夫.改革与新思维[M].苏群,译.北京:新华出版社,1987.
[14]肖德甫.世纪悲歌:苏联共产党执政失败的前前后后[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2016.
[2]梅孜编译.美国国家安全战略报告汇编[M].北京:时事出版社,1996.
[3]陈宝森.当代美国经济[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2001.
[4]曹胜强等.二十世纪国际关系史论[M].济南:济南出版社,2001.
[5]邱恩田.北约:从冷战到热战[M].北京:新华出版社,1999.
[6]梁方,李景龙,王吉远.话说北约[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2000.
[7]郝时远.帝国霸权与巴尔干“火药桶”[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,1999.
[8]Michael Doyle, Empire[M].Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1986.
[9]韩克敌.美国与苏联解体[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2011.
[10][俄]E·T·盖达尔.帝国的消亡:当代俄罗斯的教训[M].王尊贤,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008.
[11][俄]麦德维杰夫.苏联的最后一年[M].王晓玉等,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005.
[12][英]雷切尔·沃克.震撼世界的六年[M].张金鉴,译.北京:改革出版社,1999.
[13][俄]戈尔巴乔夫.改革与新思维[M].苏群,译.北京:新华出版社,1987.
[14]肖德甫.世纪悲歌:苏联共产党执政失败的前前后后[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2016.