应用玻尿酸联合A型肉毒素重塑下面部轮廓80例
|
摘要
目的分析玻尿酸颏部注射填充联合A型肉毒素注射微整形术重塑面下部轮廓的效果。方法将2015年1月-2016年4月80例微整形术治疗患者作为研究对象并根据随机数字表分组,分别40例。对照组采用玻尿酸颏部注射填充,联合组采用玻尿酸颏部注射填充联合A型肉毒素注射。比较两组美观满意度;面部僵硬等不良现象发生率;干预前后患者自信度评分、社交评分、情感功能评分、生活质量评分。结果联合组美观满意度高于对照组(P<0.05);联合组面部僵硬等不良现象发生率低于对照组(P<0.05);干预前两组自信度评分、社交评分、情感功能评分、生活质量评分相近,(P>0.05);干预后联合组自信度评分、社交评分、情感功能评分、生活质量评分优于对照组(P<0.05);联合组治疗后SAS及SDS评分均显著低于对照组及治疗前(P<0.05);随访12个月,联合组无复发,对照组复发1例(2.50%),组间复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论玻尿酸颏部注射填充联合A型肉毒素注射微整形术重塑面下部轮廓效果确切,可提高患者满意度,提高其自信心,改善情感、社交和生活质量,且面部僵硬等不良事件发生率低,安全性高。
Objective To analyze the effect of hyaluronic acid chin injection combined with type A botulinum toxin injection on the lower contour of remodeling surface. Methods A total of 80 patients with microsurgery were enrolled in this study from January 2015 to April 2016 as subjects and were randomized to a randomized list of 40 patients. The control group was injected with hyaluronide injection, and the combination group was injected with hyaluronic acid and injected with type A botulinum toxin. The incidence of adverse events such as facial stiffness and the incidence of adverse events were compared between the two groups.Result The scores of self-confidence, social scores, affective function scores and quality of life scores were observed before and after intervention.(P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse events such as joint stiffness was lower than that of the control group(P < 0.05). The score of confidence, social score, emotional function score and quality of life were similar in the two groups before intervention, and(P > 0.05). The scores of self-confidence score, social score, affective function score and quality of life score were better than those of control group after intervention(P < 0.05). The scores of SAS and SDS in the combined group were significantly lower than those in the control group and before treatment,(P < 0.05); at the 12-month follow-up, there was no recurrence in the combined group and 1 case(2.50%) in the control group, with no difference in recurrence rates Significance,(P > 0.05). Conclusion The effect of hyaluronic acid chin injection combined with type A botulinum toxin injection of microoplasty reshaped the contours of the lower part, which can improve the patient's satisfaction, improve the self-confidence, improve the emotional, social and quality of life, and facial stiffness and other adverse events Low rate, high security.
Objective To analyze the effect of hyaluronic acid chin injection combined with type A botulinum toxin injection on the lower contour of remodeling surface. Methods A total of 80 patients with microsurgery were enrolled in this study from January 2015 to April 2016 as subjects and were randomized to a randomized list of 40 patients. The control group was injected with hyaluronide injection, and the combination group was injected with hyaluronic acid and injected with type A botulinum toxin. The incidence of adverse events such as facial stiffness and the incidence of adverse events were compared between the two groups.Result The scores of self-confidence, social scores, affective function scores and quality of life scores were observed before and after intervention.(P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse events such as joint stiffness was lower than that of the control group(P < 0.05). The score of confidence, social score, emotional function score and quality of life were similar in the two groups before intervention, and(P > 0.05). The scores of self-confidence score, social score, affective function score and quality of life score were better than those of control group after intervention(P < 0.05). The scores of SAS and SDS in the combined group were significantly lower than those in the control group and before treatment,(P < 0.05); at the 12-month follow-up, there was no recurrence in the combined group and 1 case(2.50%) in the control group, with no difference in recurrence rates Significance,(P > 0.05). Conclusion The effect of hyaluronic acid chin injection combined with type A botulinum toxin injection of microoplasty reshaped the contours of the lower part, which can improve the patient's satisfaction, improve the self-confidence, improve the emotional, social and quality of life, and facial stiffness and other adverse events Low rate, high security.
引文
[1]陈萧锋.玻尿酸预防颈面部术后瘢痕的临床疗效观察[J].海峡药学,2013,25(5):196-197
[2]Petrican,Raluca,Todorov,Alexander,Burris,Christopher T.et al.The Look that Binds:PartnerDirected Altruistic Motivation and Biased Perception in Married Couples[J].Journal of nonverbal behavior,2015,39(2):165-179.
[3]田红军.玻尿酸注射美容68例临床分析[J].医学信息(下旬刊),2013,26(12):401.
[4]张连生,高俊明,刘中策等.睑袋整形术同时行眶隔脂肪释放与填充剂矫正泪槽畸形的疗效对比[J].中国美容医学,2012,21(17):2108-2109.
[5]Beyer,Frederike,Muente,Thomas F.,Goettlich,Martin et al.Orbitofrontal Cortex Reactivity to Angry Facial Expression in a Social Interaction Correlates with Aggressive Behavior[J].Cerebral cortex,2015,25(9):3057-3063.
[6]朱艳清.A型肉毒素咬肌注射联合玻尿酸颏部注射重塑面下部1/3轮廓的临床研究[J].中国医疗美容,2015,5(6):54-56.
[7]宋海金.A型肉毒素咬肌注射联合玻尿酸颏部注射填充微整形术重塑面下部1/3轮廓的临床手术效果观察[J].药品评价,2016,13(15):52-54.
[8]马艳,陆宏.A型肉毒素咬肌注射联合玻尿酸颏部注射填充微整形术重塑面下部1/3轮廓的效果分析[J].中国医疗美容,2017,7(4):6-8.
[2]Petrican,Raluca,Todorov,Alexander,Burris,Christopher T.et al.The Look that Binds:PartnerDirected Altruistic Motivation and Biased Perception in Married Couples[J].Journal of nonverbal behavior,2015,39(2):165-179.
[3]田红军.玻尿酸注射美容68例临床分析[J].医学信息(下旬刊),2013,26(12):401.
[4]张连生,高俊明,刘中策等.睑袋整形术同时行眶隔脂肪释放与填充剂矫正泪槽畸形的疗效对比[J].中国美容医学,2012,21(17):2108-2109.
[5]Beyer,Frederike,Muente,Thomas F.,Goettlich,Martin et al.Orbitofrontal Cortex Reactivity to Angry Facial Expression in a Social Interaction Correlates with Aggressive Behavior[J].Cerebral cortex,2015,25(9):3057-3063.
[6]朱艳清.A型肉毒素咬肌注射联合玻尿酸颏部注射重塑面下部1/3轮廓的临床研究[J].中国医疗美容,2015,5(6):54-56.
[7]宋海金.A型肉毒素咬肌注射联合玻尿酸颏部注射填充微整形术重塑面下部1/3轮廓的临床手术效果观察[J].药品评价,2016,13(15):52-54.
[8]马艳,陆宏.A型肉毒素咬肌注射联合玻尿酸颏部注射填充微整形术重塑面下部1/3轮廓的效果分析[J].中国医疗美容,2017,7(4):6-8.