法律体系对沪陕传染病防控工作保障程度研究
|
摘要
目的比较沪陕两地法律体系对传染病防控工作的保障程度,分析其与甲乙类法定报告传染病发病率之间的相关性。方法系统收集两地公开发布的所有传染病防控相关的规范性法律文件,量化评价两地法律体系对传染病防控工作的保障程度,并采用Spearman相关和线性回归分析法律保障程度与甲乙类法定报告传染病发病率之间的关系。结果沪陕两地传染病防控的法律保障程度均呈现上升趋势,其中上海市从2000年的60.51%上升至2017年的79.48%,同期内陕西省从59.30%上升至70.50%。两地传染病防控的法律保障程度与甲乙类法定报告传染病发病率均呈现显著负相关(r_(上海市)=-0.85、r_(陕西省)=-0.64,P<0.05)。结论沪陕两地均已形成较为健全的法律体系,上海市略优于陕西省,且对传染病防控工作引领和规范作用逐渐显现,但仍有较大的提升空间。
Objective To compare the degree of legal guarantee in Shanghai city and Shaanxi province,and to analyze the correlation between the degree of legal guarantee and the reported incidence of class A and B infectious diseases. Methods All normative documents of law related to the prevention of infectious diseases in Shanghai and Shaanxi were systematically collected,and the degree of legal guarantee for the prevention and control of infectious diseases was quantitatively evaluated.Spearman correlation and linear regression were used to analyze the relationship between the degree of legal guarantee and the incidence of infectious diseases. Results The degree of legal regulations' guarantee on infectious disease prevention in Shanghai and Shaanxi showed an upward trend,with Shanghai increasing from 60.51% in 2000 to 79.48% in 2017,and Shaanxi increasing from 59.30% in 2000 to 70.50% in 2017.There was a significantly negative correlation between the legal guarantee degree and the reported incidence of infectious diseases in Shanghai and Shaanxi(r_(Shanghai)=-0.85,r_(Shaanxi)=-0.64,P<0.05). Conclusion Both of the two places have gradually formed a relatively complete legal system.Shanghai city is slightly better than Shaanxi province,and the leading and regulating role is gradually emerging,but there is still plenty of room for improvement.
Objective To compare the degree of legal guarantee in Shanghai city and Shaanxi province,and to analyze the correlation between the degree of legal guarantee and the reported incidence of class A and B infectious diseases. Methods All normative documents of law related to the prevention of infectious diseases in Shanghai and Shaanxi were systematically collected,and the degree of legal guarantee for the prevention and control of infectious diseases was quantitatively evaluated.Spearman correlation and linear regression were used to analyze the relationship between the degree of legal guarantee and the incidence of infectious diseases. Results The degree of legal regulations' guarantee on infectious disease prevention in Shanghai and Shaanxi showed an upward trend,with Shanghai increasing from 60.51% in 2000 to 79.48% in 2017,and Shaanxi increasing from 59.30% in 2000 to 70.50% in 2017.There was a significantly negative correlation between the legal guarantee degree and the reported incidence of infectious diseases in Shanghai and Shaanxi(r_(Shanghai)=-0.85,r_(Shaanxi)=-0.64,P<0.05). Conclusion Both of the two places have gradually formed a relatively complete legal system.Shanghai city is slightly better than Shaanxi province,and the leading and regulating role is gradually emerging,but there is still plenty of room for improvement.
引文
[1] 李斌.国务院关于传染病防治工作和传染病防治法实施情况的报告[J].首都公共卫生,2013,7(5):193-195.
[2] 王祥.我国传染病防治法律制度的完善[D].天津师范大学,2014.
[3] 齐朝晖,吴金明.《中华人民共和国传染病防治法》对防治传染病疾病的重要意义[J].中国公共卫生管理,2004,20(2):135-137.
[4] 曹巍鲲.公共卫生管理在传染病预防中的定位与干预[J].中国卫生产业,2016,13(17):64-66.
[5] 刘亚男.国际法视野中的传染病防治与合作[D].河北经贸大学,2011.
[6] 刘丹,陈卫民.论传染病防治法律法规实施中存在的问题与对策[J].中外健康文摘,2011,8(17):386-388.
[7] 杨芸.论我国传染病疫情报告、通报和公布制度的完善[D].南京师范大学,2014.
[8] 王奉新,张志强,刘鹏,等.新发传染病控制与卫生检疫法律体系完善[J].旅行医学科学,2007,13(4):18-19.
[9] 上海市卫生和计划生育委员会.上海卫生计生数据[EB/OL].[2018/12/04].http://www.wsjsw.gov.cn/wsj/n429/n432/n1488/n1490/index.html.
[10] 陕西省统计局.陕西统计数据库[EB/OL].[2018/12/04].http://tjsjk.shaanxitj.gov.cn:7001/multidimensionalqueryIndex.do.
[11] 马家奇,王丽萍,戚晓鹏,等.2004年法定传染病报告信息质量分析[J].疾病监测,2005,20(5):264-266.
[12] 郭晓荣,郁惠莲,邱琳.陕西省2004年传染病疫情报告信息质量评价[J].疾病监测,2005,20(10):537-539.
[13] 王博勋.传染病防治,到位了吗?[J].中国人大,2018(11):32-34.
[14] 罗灿.上海市“十一五”地方卫生立法规划项目研究[D].复旦大学,2011.
[15] 郝模,李程跃,于明珠,等.新时代公共卫生体系的思考与研究[J].上海预防医学,2017,29(12):905-910.
[16] 郝模,马安宁,王志锋,等.卫生政策学[M].第2版北京:人民卫生出版社,2013.
[17] 孙静,金平阅,张春瑜,等.卫生立法的国际经验对我国的启示[J].中国卫生政策研究,2016,9(10):66-71.
[18] 邓秀华,段红柳.论法律的强制力和权威性[J].湖湘论坛,2002,15(3):910.
[2] 王祥.我国传染病防治法律制度的完善[D].天津师范大学,2014.
[3] 齐朝晖,吴金明.《中华人民共和国传染病防治法》对防治传染病疾病的重要意义[J].中国公共卫生管理,2004,20(2):135-137.
[4] 曹巍鲲.公共卫生管理在传染病预防中的定位与干预[J].中国卫生产业,2016,13(17):64-66.
[5] 刘亚男.国际法视野中的传染病防治与合作[D].河北经贸大学,2011.
[6] 刘丹,陈卫民.论传染病防治法律法规实施中存在的问题与对策[J].中外健康文摘,2011,8(17):386-388.
[7] 杨芸.论我国传染病疫情报告、通报和公布制度的完善[D].南京师范大学,2014.
[8] 王奉新,张志强,刘鹏,等.新发传染病控制与卫生检疫法律体系完善[J].旅行医学科学,2007,13(4):18-19.
[9] 上海市卫生和计划生育委员会.上海卫生计生数据[EB/OL].[2018/12/04].http://www.wsjsw.gov.cn/wsj/n429/n432/n1488/n1490/index.html.
[10] 陕西省统计局.陕西统计数据库[EB/OL].[2018/12/04].http://tjsjk.shaanxitj.gov.cn:7001/multidimensionalqueryIndex.do.
[11] 马家奇,王丽萍,戚晓鹏,等.2004年法定传染病报告信息质量分析[J].疾病监测,2005,20(5):264-266.
[12] 郭晓荣,郁惠莲,邱琳.陕西省2004年传染病疫情报告信息质量评价[J].疾病监测,2005,20(10):537-539.
[13] 王博勋.传染病防治,到位了吗?[J].中国人大,2018(11):32-34.
[14] 罗灿.上海市“十一五”地方卫生立法规划项目研究[D].复旦大学,2011.
[15] 郝模,李程跃,于明珠,等.新时代公共卫生体系的思考与研究[J].上海预防医学,2017,29(12):905-910.
[16] 郝模,马安宁,王志锋,等.卫生政策学[M].第2版北京:人民卫生出版社,2013.
[17] 孙静,金平阅,张春瑜,等.卫生立法的国际经验对我国的启示[J].中国卫生政策研究,2016,9(10):66-71.
[18] 邓秀华,段红柳.论法律的强制力和权威性[J].湖湘论坛,2002,15(3):910.