从两宋文献辨伪之间的差距看文献辨伪在宋代的分期问题
|
摘要
现代学者多将北宋和南宋两个朝代的文献辨伪当作一个整体来讨论。具体分析北宋和南宋在文献辨伪学者、文考辨书目数量和文献辨伪取得的成就等方面,认为北宋和南宋的文献辨伪在发展程度上并不处在同一个阶段。此外,分析了产生这一现象的原因,认为造成这一局面的因素主要包括文献辨伪学科发展的规律、两宋不同的学风和经济原因。
Scholars used to treating the distinguishing pseudoscience in North Song and South Song Dynasty as a same stage.From analyzing the scholars who devoted to the distinguishing pseudoscience,the books that had been authenticated and the achievements in North Song and South Song Dynasty,this paper suggests that the distinguishing pseudoscience phases in North Song and South Song Dynasty are completely different.Besides,it also concludes the reason that caused the situation,which include law of subject development,different academic atmosphere and economic issues in North Song and South Song Dynasty.
Scholars used to treating the distinguishing pseudoscience in North Song and South Song Dynasty as a same stage.From analyzing the scholars who devoted to the distinguishing pseudoscience,the books that had been authenticated and the achievements in North Song and South Song Dynasty,this paper suggests that the distinguishing pseudoscience phases in North Song and South Song Dynasty are completely different.Besides,it also concludes the reason that caused the situation,which include law of subject development,different academic atmosphere and economic issues in North Song and South Song Dynasty.
引文
[1]梁启超.古书真伪常识[M].北京:中华书局,2012:45.
[2]张富祥.宋代文献学研究[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2006:250.
[3]王余光,钱婉约.朱熹在辩伪学上的成就和影响[J].四川图书馆学报,1987(4):79-84.
[4]郑良树.古籍辨伪学[M].台北:台湾学生书局,1986:77.
[5]郝润华,丁俊丽.《四库全书总目》对《郡斋读书志》的接受与批评[J].图书馆杂志,2010(8):72-77.
[6]黄嬿婉.《四库全书总目》误引《直斋书录解题》订正十七则[J].四川图书馆学报,2011(6):94-96.
[7]杨绪敏.中国辨伪学史[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2007:101-103.
[8]曾贻芬.胡应麟与古籍辨伪[J].史学史研究,1996(1):68-74.
[9]洪湛侯.中国文献学新探[M].台北:台湾学生书局,1992:75.
[10]林庆彰.明代考据学研究[M].台北:台湾学生书局,1983:205-206.
[11]谢国桢.史料学概论[M].福州:福建人民出版社,1985:167.
[12]顾颉刚.古籍考辨丛刊[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2009:62.
[13]杨亮功.中国教育史研究[M].台北:汉苑出版社,1985:201.
[14]罗春兰,兰健.宋代江西经学研究之格局[J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2017(3):44-50.
[15]朱仙林.辨伪与造伪并存——《四部正讹》成书前的明代辨伪学[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2014(4):220-225.
[2]张富祥.宋代文献学研究[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2006:250.
[3]王余光,钱婉约.朱熹在辩伪学上的成就和影响[J].四川图书馆学报,1987(4):79-84.
[4]郑良树.古籍辨伪学[M].台北:台湾学生书局,1986:77.
[5]郝润华,丁俊丽.《四库全书总目》对《郡斋读书志》的接受与批评[J].图书馆杂志,2010(8):72-77.
[6]黄嬿婉.《四库全书总目》误引《直斋书录解题》订正十七则[J].四川图书馆学报,2011(6):94-96.
[7]杨绪敏.中国辨伪学史[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2007:101-103.
[8]曾贻芬.胡应麟与古籍辨伪[J].史学史研究,1996(1):68-74.
[9]洪湛侯.中国文献学新探[M].台北:台湾学生书局,1992:75.
[10]林庆彰.明代考据学研究[M].台北:台湾学生书局,1983:205-206.
[11]谢国桢.史料学概论[M].福州:福建人民出版社,1985:167.
[12]顾颉刚.古籍考辨丛刊[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2009:62.
[13]杨亮功.中国教育史研究[M].台北:汉苑出版社,1985:201.
[14]罗春兰,兰健.宋代江西经学研究之格局[J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2017(3):44-50.
[15]朱仙林.辨伪与造伪并存——《四部正讹》成书前的明代辨伪学[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2014(4):220-225.