黄震的文献辨伪研究
|
摘要
黄震为南宋著名学者,在经学、理学、史学等各方面都颇有建树,近年来,研究其治学成就的学者不乏其人。论文主要从文献学角度入手,对黄震在文献辨伪领域的一些相关问题进行探讨。黄震的文献辨伪主要体现在其《黄氏日抄》中,在该书中,黄震考辨文献24种,涉及经部、史部和子部三种。论文从其文献考辨书目、辨伪方法、取得的成就和存在的不足等方面综合讨论了其在文献辨伪方面的成就。
Huang Zhen was a famous scholar who had a great achievement in Confucian Classics, Neo-Confucianism and historiography in Song Dynasty. A number of scholars have been committed to the academic fields of Huang Zhen from different aspects since modern times. This paper mainly discusses the issues of literature distinguishing pseudoscience of Huang Zhen. Huang Zhen's literature distinguishing pseudoscience was mainly reflected in Huang Shi Ri Chao. In this book, Huang Zhen had discriminated 24 books, which were classified as Canons, Philosophy and History Department in Imperial Collection of Four. This paper mainly describes the books, methods, achievements and deficiencies that Huang Zhen had in his literature distinguishing pseudoscience.
Huang Zhen was a famous scholar who had a great achievement in Confucian Classics, Neo-Confucianism and historiography in Song Dynasty. A number of scholars have been committed to the academic fields of Huang Zhen from different aspects since modern times. This paper mainly discusses the issues of literature distinguishing pseudoscience of Huang Zhen. Huang Zhen's literature distinguishing pseudoscience was mainly reflected in Huang Shi Ri Chao. In this book, Huang Zhen had discriminated 24 books, which were classified as Canons, Philosophy and History Department in Imperial Collection of Four. This paper mainly describes the books, methods, achievements and deficiencies that Huang Zhen had in his literature distinguishing pseudoscience.
引文
[1]张伟.黄震与东发学派[M].北京:人民出版社,2003.
[2]郑良树.古籍辨伪学[M].台北:台湾学生书局,1986.
[3]杨绪敏.中国辨伪学史[M].天津:天津人民出版社,1999:49.
[4]孙钦善.古代辨伪学概述(中)[J].文献,1983(1):246-256.
[5]张富祥.宋代文献学[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2004:315.
[6]马达.《列子》“辨伪文字辑略”匡正[J].衡阳师专学报(社会科学版),1995(2):38-43.
[7]耿振东.《管子》接受史(宋以前)[D].上海:华东师范大学,2009.
[8]黄震.黄氏日抄:卷69[M]//纪昀.文渊阁四库全书.上海:上海古籍出版社,2003:第708册.
[9]林政华.宋代大儒黄震(东发)之生平与学术[M].台北:花木兰文化出版社,2011:16.
[10]苏金侠.晁公武、陈振孙文献辨伪研究[J].图书馆建设,2017(7):94-100.
[11]陈振孙.直斋书录解题:卷9[M]//纪昀.文渊阁四库全书.上海:上海古籍出版社,2003:第674册.
[12]何俊.南宋儒学建构[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2013.
[13]黄震.黄氏日钞:卷30[M]//纪昀.文渊阁四库全书.上海:上海古籍出版社,2003:第707册.
[14]黄宗羲.宋元学案:卷86[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
[15]洪湛侯.中国文献学新探[M].台北:台湾学生书局,1992:75.
[16]林庆彰.明代考据学研究[M].台北:台湾学生书局,1983:205-206.
[17]谢国桢.史料学概论[M].福州:福建人民出版社,1985:167.
(1)表3主要是为了与黄震考辨书目进行对比,朱熹文献中涉及集部、佛藏和道藏文献的辨伪,本文并未列出。
[2]郑良树.古籍辨伪学[M].台北:台湾学生书局,1986.
[3]杨绪敏.中国辨伪学史[M].天津:天津人民出版社,1999:49.
[4]孙钦善.古代辨伪学概述(中)[J].文献,1983(1):246-256.
[5]张富祥.宋代文献学[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2004:315.
[6]马达.《列子》“辨伪文字辑略”匡正[J].衡阳师专学报(社会科学版),1995(2):38-43.
[7]耿振东.《管子》接受史(宋以前)[D].上海:华东师范大学,2009.
[8]黄震.黄氏日抄:卷69[M]//纪昀.文渊阁四库全书.上海:上海古籍出版社,2003:第708册.
[9]林政华.宋代大儒黄震(东发)之生平与学术[M].台北:花木兰文化出版社,2011:16.
[10]苏金侠.晁公武、陈振孙文献辨伪研究[J].图书馆建设,2017(7):94-100.
[11]陈振孙.直斋书录解题:卷9[M]//纪昀.文渊阁四库全书.上海:上海古籍出版社,2003:第674册.
[12]何俊.南宋儒学建构[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2013.
[13]黄震.黄氏日钞:卷30[M]//纪昀.文渊阁四库全书.上海:上海古籍出版社,2003:第707册.
[14]黄宗羲.宋元学案:卷86[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
[15]洪湛侯.中国文献学新探[M].台北:台湾学生书局,1992:75.
[16]林庆彰.明代考据学研究[M].台北:台湾学生书局,1983:205-206.
[17]谢国桢.史料学概论[M].福州:福建人民出版社,1985:167.
(1)表3主要是为了与黄震考辨书目进行对比,朱熹文献中涉及集部、佛藏和道藏文献的辨伪,本文并未列出。