传统风格建筑RC-CFST组合框架拟动力试验及弹塑性地震反应分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Pseudo-dynamic test and elasto-plastic seismic response analysis of RC-CFST composite frame model of traditional-style building
  • 作者:薛建阳 ; 翟磊 ; 赵轩 ; 李海博 ; 葛鸿鹏
  • 英文作者:Xue Jianyang;Zhai Lei;Zhao Xuan;Li Haibo;Ge Hongpeng;Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology;China Northwestern Architecture Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd.;
  • 关键词:传统风格建筑 ; RC-CFST组合框架 ; 拟动力试验 ; 抗震性能 ; 弹塑性地震反应分析
  • 英文关键词:traditional-style building;;RC-CFST composite frame;;pseudo-dynamic test;;seismic performance;;elasto-plastic seismic response analysis
  • 中文刊名:TMGC
  • 英文刊名:China Civil Engineering Journal
  • 机构:西安建筑科技大学;中国建筑西北设计研究院有限公司;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-15
  • 出版单位:土木工程学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.52
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金(51678478);; 中建股份科技研发课题(CSCEC-2012-Z-16)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:TMGC201906003
  • 页数:11
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:11-2120/TU
  • 分类号:28-38
摘要
对一缩尺比为1/2的传统风格建筑钢筋混凝土(RC)-钢管混凝土(CFST)组合框架模型进行El Centro波、Taft波、兰州波及汶川波等地震波作用下的拟动力试验,得到该模型的自振频率以及加速度、位移和应变等动力响应。分析模型结构的破坏过程、恢复力特征曲线及变形能力等抗震性能。研究表明:乳栿为模型结构的第一道抗震防线;随着输入地震波加速度峰值的增加,框架模型的自振频率下降,加速度放大系数逐渐减小,模型结构的恢复力特征曲线呈现出一定程度的"捏缩"效应。由应变分析可知,金柱纵筋先于檐柱纵筋屈服;乳栿和混凝土柱为模型结构的主要耗能构件。基于试验研究结果,采用有限元分析软件SAP2000对试验模型框架进行弹塑性地震反应分析,计算结果与试验实测结果吻合较好。计算分析结果表明:模型框架的出铰顺序依次为乳栿两侧、金柱柱底、檐柱柱底、金柱CFST柱底部及檐柱CFST柱底部。在峰值加速度为0.70g的El Centro波作用下,模型柱架的极限弹塑性层间位移角与规范规定的限值较为接近,表明框架结构具有较高的抗震安全储备。
        Pseudo-dynamic tests on a 1/2-scale reinforced concrete(RC)-concrete filled steel tube(CFST)composite frame model of traditional-style building were carried out under the seismic excitation of El Centro wave, Taft wave, Lanzhou wave and Wenchuan wave. The natural frequency and the responses of acceleration,displacement and strain were attained. Failure process, restoring force characteristic curves and deformation capacity were investigated. The results indicate that Rufu beams play the role of first seismic fortification line of model structure. With the increase of input peak ground acceleration, the natural frequency and the acceleration amplification factor decrease gradually. Meanwhile, the pinching phenomenon of hysteretic loops can be observed. The strain analyses indicate that longitudinal bars in corner columns yield before those in side and middle columns. Rufu beams and concrete columns are the main energy dissipation components of the model structure. Based on the experimental study, the elasto-plastic seismic response analysis was conducted by using the SAP2000 software. The elasto-plastic seismic response analysis results agree well with the test ones. The calculated results show that the order of plastic hinges in the model is as follows: firstly Rufu beam ends, then inner columns bottom, side columns bottom, finally inner CFST column bottom and side CFST columns bottom.Under the seismic input of El Centro wave with a peak acceleration of 0.70 g, the ultimate elasto-plastic story drift rotation of columns approaches to the limit value specified in the seismic code, indicating that the frame structure has a high seismic safety reservation.
引文
[1]谢启芳,李朋,葛鸿鹏,等.传统风格钢筋混凝土梁-柱节点抗震性能试验研究[J].世界地震工程,2015,31(4):150-158(Xie Qifang,Li Peng,Ge Hongpeng,et al.Experimental study on seismic behavior of RCcolumn-beam joint built in traditional style[J].World Earthquake Engineering,2015,31(4):150-158(in Chinese))
    [2]王昌兴,徐珂,田立强.洛阳隋唐城天堂遗址保护建筑结构设计[J].钢结构,2011,26(8):32-36(Wang Changxing,Xu Ke,Tian Liqiang.Structure design of tiantang for the protection of the ruins of ancient buildings built in the Sui and Tang dynasty in Luoyang city[J].Steel Construction,2011,26(8):32-36(in Chinese))
    [3]吴翔艳.定鼎门钢结构仿古建筑组成及力学性能研究[D].西安:长安大学,2010(Wu Xiangyan.Dingding gate steel structure component and mechanical properties of antique buildings[D].Xi’an:Chang’an University,2010(in Chinese))
    [4]Nakashima M,Matsumiya T,Suita K,et al.Full-scale test of composite frame under large cyclic loading[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2007,133(2):297-304
    [5]Denavit M D,Hajjar J F.Nonlinear seismic analysis of circular concrete-filled steel tube members and frames[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2011,138(9):1089-1098
    [6]聂建国,黄远,樊健生.考虑楼板组合作用的方钢管混凝土组合框架受力性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2011,32(3):99-108(Nie Jianguo,Huang Yuan,Fan Jiansheng.Experimental study on load-bearing behavior of rectangular CFST frame considering composite action of floor slab[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2011,32(3):99-108(in Chinese))
    [7]林建鹏.仿古建筑方钢管混凝土柱与钢筋混凝土圆柱连接抗震性能试验研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2015(Lin Jianpeng.Experimental study on seismic behavior of imitated ancient building connections between concrete filled square steel tube columns and reinforced concrete circular columns[D].Xi’an:Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology,2015(in Chinese))
    [8]姚谦峰,陈平.土木工程结构试验[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001:152-185(Yao Qianfeng,Chen Ping.Structural experiment in civil engineering[M].Beijing:China Architecture&Building Press,2001:152-185(in Chinese))
    [9]梁炯丰.大型火电厂钢结构主厂房框排架结构抗震性能及设计方法研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2013(Liang Jiongfeng.Study on seismic behavior and seismic design method of steel frame-bent structures of large thermal powerplant main buildings[D].Xi’an:Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology,2013(in Chinese))
    [10]薛建阳,赵鸿铁,张鹏程.中国古建筑木结构模型的振动台试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2004,37(6):6-11(Xue Jianyang,Zhao Hongtie,Zhang Pengcheng.Study on the seismic behaviors of Chinese ancient wooden building by shaking table test[J].China Civil Engineering Journal,2004,37(6):6-11(in Chinese))
    [11]隋龑,赵鸿铁,薛建阳,等.中国古建筑木结构铺作层与柱架抗震试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2011,44(1):50-57(Sui Yan,Zhao Hongtie,Xue Jianyang,et al.Experimental study of the seismicity of Dougong and wooden frame in Chinese historic buildings[J].China Civil Engineering Journal,2011,44(1):50-57(in Chinese))
    [12]丁陶,曹明,王少华.基于SAP2000预制再生混凝土框架非线性地震反应分析[J].建筑结构,2014,47(13):29-33(Ding Tao,Cao Ming,Wang Shaohua.Nonlinear seismic response analysis on the precast recycled aggregate concrete frame based on SAP2000[J].Building Structure,2014,47(13):29-33(in Chinese))

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700