单纯刮痧、拔罐与刮痧联合拔罐治疗颈型颈椎病的效果对比
|
摘要
目的:观察单纯刮痧、拔罐和刮痧联合拔罐与对颈型颈椎病的治疗效果。方法:将2014年5月-2016年5月于我院诊治的81例颈型颈椎病患者随机分为刮痧组、拔罐组、痧罐联合组,每组各27例,分别予刮痧、拔罐和痧罐联合治疗,三组均6 d治疗1次,共治疗30 d。比较三组治疗前后NPQ、VAS评分及治疗结束后的临床疗效。结果:三组治疗后NPQ评分和VAS积分较治疗前均下降(P <0.05),痧罐联合组与另两组比较下降幅度更大(P <0.05);刮痧组、拔罐组、痧罐联合组总有效率分别为92.6%、88.9%和100.0%,刮痧组与拔罐组疗效无明显差异(P> 0.05),痧罐联合组比其他两组疗效更好(P <0.01)。结论:刮痧和拔罐均可减轻颈型颈椎病患者疼痛,改善患者临床主症及生活质量,而且刮痧联合拔罐治疗颈型颈椎病的临床疗效更好。
Objective: To observe clinical efficacy of Guasha(刮痧), cupping; cupping plus Guasha on cervical spondylopathy.Methods: May 2014-May 2016, 81 cases were divided into 3 groups, 27 cases in each, treated by Guasha, cupping, cupping plus Guasha respectively, treated once every 6 days, for 30 days. Results: After treatment, the NPQ scores and VAS scores in three groups were decreased(P<0.05), and the cupping plus Guasha group were decreased the most(P<0.05). The total efficacency in the Guasha group,the cupping group and the cupping plus Guasha group were 92.6%, 88.9% and 100.0%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the Guasha group and the cupping group(P>0.05), and the cupping plus Guasha group had the best effects(P<0.01). Conclusion:Cupping plus Guasha on cervical spondylopathy show a better effect.
Objective: To observe clinical efficacy of Guasha(刮痧), cupping; cupping plus Guasha on cervical spondylopathy.Methods: May 2014-May 2016, 81 cases were divided into 3 groups, 27 cases in each, treated by Guasha, cupping, cupping plus Guasha respectively, treated once every 6 days, for 30 days. Results: After treatment, the NPQ scores and VAS scores in three groups were decreased(P<0.05), and the cupping plus Guasha group were decreased the most(P<0.05). The total efficacency in the Guasha group,the cupping group and the cupping plus Guasha group were 92.6%, 88.9% and 100.0%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the Guasha group and the cupping group(P>0.05), and the cupping plus Guasha group had the best effects(P<0.01). Conclusion:Cupping plus Guasha on cervical spondylopathy show a better effect.
引文
[1]林星华.观察温针灸颈三针治疗颈型颈椎病的临床疗效[J].中医临床研究,2017,9(16):43-44.
[2]徐利民,王素娟.颈型颈椎病及中医治疗进展综述[J].内蒙古中医药,2017,36(17):123-124.
[3]中国康复医学会.颈椎病诊治与康复指南(2010版)[M].北京:中国康复医学会颈椎病专业委员会,2010:1-7.
[4]杨舟,何亚敏.刮痧疗法[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2012:48-51.
[5]谢华,黄洁.拔罐疗法[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2012:16-18.
[6]吴松,梁忠.试论刮痧“现瘀排瘀,调理气血”[J].中国针灸,2016,36(04):428-430.
[7]黄美,安红丽.刮痧拔罐法治疗颈型颈椎病30例临床观察[J].江苏中医药,2016,48(11):56-58.
[8]孟方,段培蓓,安红丽,等.刮痧联合拔罐治疗颈型颈椎病疗效观察[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2016,18(07):202-205.
[2]徐利民,王素娟.颈型颈椎病及中医治疗进展综述[J].内蒙古中医药,2017,36(17):123-124.
[3]中国康复医学会.颈椎病诊治与康复指南(2010版)[M].北京:中国康复医学会颈椎病专业委员会,2010:1-7.
[4]杨舟,何亚敏.刮痧疗法[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2012:48-51.
[5]谢华,黄洁.拔罐疗法[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2012:16-18.
[6]吴松,梁忠.试论刮痧“现瘀排瘀,调理气血”[J].中国针灸,2016,36(04):428-430.
[7]黄美,安红丽.刮痧拔罐法治疗颈型颈椎病30例临床观察[J].江苏中医药,2016,48(11):56-58.
[8]孟方,段培蓓,安红丽,等.刮痧联合拔罐治疗颈型颈椎病疗效观察[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2016,18(07):202-205.