摘要
陶渊明诗文中的异文数量甚多,对这些异文的考辨历来都是古代文学研究中的关注要点。逯钦立校注的《陶渊明集》,在考校过程中使用了详实的文献参考,对于很多异文的考辨,提出了具有创新性的观点和解释。但是,对于陶渊明集的校勘工作并不是一件容易之事,逯先生在校勘过程中也有某些疏略之处,这是不可避免的。本文就逯校本《陶渊明集》中的五则异文,进行辨析和探讨。
There are many different literary works in Tao Yuanming's poem. These arguments have always been the focus of attention in the study of ancient literature. Lu Qinli proofreads Tao Yuanming's Collention. When he proofreads it, he uses many specific bibliographies and he puts forward some creative opinions and explanation for many different literary works. However, it is not easy to proofread Tao Yuanming's Collention. Mr Lu has some negligence in the process of proofreading, which is inevitable. The thesis is to discuss and explore the five edition.
引文
[1]陶渊明.笺注陶渊明集[M].//续修四库全书:第1304册.李公焕辑.上海:上海古籍出版社,2002:1026-1030.
[2]逯钦立.陶渊明集[M].北京:中华书局,2015:11-12.
[3]袁行霈.陶渊明集笺注[M].北京:中华书局,2011:4.
[4]许慎.说文解字[M].北京:中华书局,1987:250.
[5]龚斌.陶渊明集校笺[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2011:8.
[6]论语[M].来可泓注.西安:陕西人民出版社, 1996:246.
[7]李映山,张玲.论意象的建构与意境的生成[J].湘南学院学报,2006(04):60
[8]程俊英.诗经译注[M].//中国古代名著全本译注从书.上海:上海古籍出版社, 2016:353.
[9]刘勰.文心雕龙[M].上海:上海古籍出版社, 2015:93.
[10]《二十四史》编委会.二十四史文白对照精华版[M].北京:线装书局, 2014:2223.