养老资产年金化谜题:风险决策下的年金化价值比较
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Annuity Puzzle:the Comparison of Annuitization Value under Venture Decision
  • 作者:单戈 ; 王晓军
  • 英文作者:SHAN Ge;WANG Xiao-jun;Center for applied statistics,Renmin University of China;School of Statistics,Renmin University of China;
  • 关键词:年金谜题 ; 风险决策 ; 累积前景理论 ; 精算模型
  • 英文关键词:annuity puzzle;;venture decision;;cumulative prospect theory;;actuarial model
  • 中文刊名:TJLT
  • 英文刊名:Statistics & Information Forum
  • 机构:中国人民大学统计学院;中国人民大学应用统计科学研究中心;
  • 出版日期:2018-05-15 15:29
  • 出版单位:统计与信息论坛
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.33;No.213
  • 基金:中国人民大学研究生科研基金项目《企业年金领取阶段的优化设计与风险评估》(17XNH089);; 国家社会科学基金重大项目《我国养老保障体系应对人口老龄化挑战的对策研究》(13ZD164);; 国家自然科学基金项目《社会保障管理研究》(71173230)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:TJLT201806011
  • 页数:10
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:61-1421/C
  • 分类号:78-87
摘要
随着中国经济增长放缓和人口老龄化加剧,社会养老保险提供的养老金份额呈下降趋势,职业养老金计划呈转向缴费确定型(DC)计划的趋势,养老保障中的长寿风险、投资风险、通胀风险等将更多地由个人承担。虽然相关研究表明,养老资产年金化是退休者的最优选择,但在实践中退休者自愿年金化的比率很低,使人们暴露在巨大的风险之中。那么,是哪些因素通过怎样的渠道影响着人们的年金化决策?如何评价年金化的价值?这些问题成为非常重要的研究课题。在相关文献评述的基础上,将行为经济学中的"累积前景理论"引入传统的精算模型,从个人风险决策的角度衡量年金的价值,并进一步将遗赠动机纳入终身福利价值模型,从风险决策角度测算遗赠动机对年金化决策的影响,并在此基础上考虑保险成本和投资机会成本等现实因素的影响。研究发现:风险决策视角下,年金的累积前景价值低于年金精算中性价值,养老年金不再是个人的最优选择。同时遗赠动机越强的个人越倾向于自我养老,保险成本和投资机会成本也会显著影响个人的年金决策。这些结论使年金需求不足的现象得到了较好的解释。
        With economic growth slowing down and population ageing,the pension benefit shares from social insurance have been decreasing,and the occupational pension plans sponsored by employers have been experiencing a transition from DB to DC.The individual will burden more longevity risk,investment risk and inflation risk in old-age security.Although the annuitization of individual assets at retirement has been considered as the optimal choice for retirees,few people would like to annuitize their assets voluntarily.As more and more people are exposed to longevity risk,it is imperative to explore factors affecting people's decisions of annuitizaiton and how these factors work.Based upon literature review,this article introduces the cumulative prospect theory of behavioral economics into the traditional actuarial model,and revalues annuities from the view of venture decision.Furthermore,by incorporating bequest motives into the framework of life welfare model,this article calculates the effects of bequest motives,insurance cost and opportunity cost of investment on annuitizaiton decision.The results show that,the cumulative prospect value of annuity is lower than its actuarial neutral value from the view of venture decision,and thus life annuity would not be the optimal choice for the individual.Moreover,people with stronger bequest motives are more likely to choose self-annuitization,and insurance cost and investment opportunity cost also have a significantly negative influence on the annuitization decision.Therefore,the low demand of life annuity can be well explained.
引文
[1]Yaari M E.Uncertain Lifetime,Life Insurance,and the Theory of the Consumer[J].Review of Economic Studies,1965,32(2).
    [2]Davidoff T,Brown J R,Diamond P A.Annuities and Individual Welfare[J].The American Economic Review,2005,95(5).
    [3]Schaus S.Annuities Make a Comeback[J].Journal of Pension Benefits,2005,12(4).
    [4]Inkmann J,Lopes P,Michaelides A.How Deep is the Annuity Market Participation Puzzle?[J].Review of Financial Studies,2011,24(1).
    [5]Hu W Y,Scott J S.Behavioral Obstacles to the Annuity Market[J].Financial Analysts Journal,2007,63(6).
    [6]Brown J,Mitchell O.Who Values the Social Security Annuity?New Evidence on the Annuity Puzzle[R].National Bureau of Economic Research,2007.
    [7]Scott J S,Watson J G,Hu W Y.Efficient Annuitization:Optimal Strategies for Hedging Mortality Risk.Pension Research Council[R].Working Paper,2007.
    [8]Gong G,Webb A.Evaluating the Advanced Life Deferred Annuity-An Annuity People Might Actually Buy[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing,2010,46(1).
    [9]Walliser M J.Regulation of Withdrawals in Individual Account Systems[M].Washington,D.C:International Monetary Fund,2000.
    [10]Lockwood L M.Bequest Motives and the Annuity Puzzle[J].Review of Economic Dynamics,2012,15(2).
    [11]李志生,胡凯.多因素影响下的最优年金化时间决策[J].经济研究,2011(S1).
    [12]Brown J R,Kling J R,Mullainathan S,et al.Why Don't People Insure Late-Life Consumption?A Framing Explanation of the Under-Annuitization Puzzle[J].American Economic Review,2008,98(2).
    [13]Johnson R W,Burman L,Kobes D I.Anuitized Wealth at Older Ages:Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study[M].Washington DC:The Urban Institute,2004.
    [14]Kahneman D,Tversky A.Prospect Theory:An Analysis of Decision under Risk.[J].Econometrica,1979,47(2).
    [15]Tversky A,Kahneman D.Advances in Prospect Theory:Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty[J].Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,1992,5(4).
    [16]Quiggin J.A Theory of Anticipated Utility[J].Journal of Economic Behavior&Organization,1982,3(4).
    [17]Ingersoll J E.Cumulative Prospect Theory,Aggregation,and Pricing[J].Critical Finance Review,2016(5).
    [18]曾建敏.实验检验累积前景理论[J].暨南大学学报:自然科学与医学版,2007,28(1).
    [19]万晴瑶,成德义.中国年金保险货币价值(MWR)实证研究[J].保险研究,2015(9).
    (1)具体可参考Dushi和Webb的研究(2004)。
    (2)更多讨论可参考Walliser(2000),Sinclair的(2004),Horneff,Mitchell和Maurer(2006)的研究。
    (3)年金等价财富(AEW)的含义是:个人如果使用其他资产标的复制与终身生存年金相同的消费现金流,所需要的财富价值。更多关于AEW的讨论可参考Brown和Warshawsky(2001),Brown和Poterba(1999)的研究。
    (4)决策中当至少有一个决策选项的结果包含不确定性时,该决策就被称为风险决策。
    (1)具体可参考Brown(2007)的研究成果。
    (1)依据保监发[2013]62号文件,普通型人身保险预定利率由保险公司按照审慎原则自行决定,普通型人身保险保单法定评估利率为3.5%,我们假设定价假设与评估假设相同。
    (1)MWR为年金产品的精算中性价值与市场价格的比值,MWR越低说明年金产品附加成本越大。

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700