摘要
从《大连交通大学学报》的一类滞审稿件中,选取最具代表性的一篇论文,分析其送审过程和审稿结果,探讨适合刊物自身特点的审稿专家遴选方法。编辑在选择审稿专家时要考虑以下几个方面:选择小同行审稿专家、内外交叉审稿、选择学术水平相对较高的审稿专家,同时注意多关注和挖掘学术活跃度高、精力旺盛的青年审稿人,建设有针对性的审稿专家队伍,以期提高审稿效率和审稿质量。
Selection methods of peer reviewers for manuscripts of the Journal of Dalian Jiaotong University were explored by analyzing the review process and results of a representative overdue paper. The following aspects should be considered for editor to choose the suitable reviewer: tending to select the review experts with high academic level and similar research background,adopting to both internal and external peer review,as well as paying more attention to the energetic young academic reviewers with high academic activity. In these ways,a corresponding team of peer review experts could be built to improve the efficiency of manuscript review and the quality of journals.
引文
[1]张玉,葛建平,苏磊,等.如何有效利用专家审稿意见处理稿件[J].编辑学报,2016,28(1):48
[2]于洋,段桂花,张维维,等.科技期刊国内外审稿人的选择与合作[J].编辑学报,2016,28(4):363
[3]刘玉姝,陆芳,何亚楣,等.科技期刊专家审稿过程中的问题分析及对策[J].编辑学报,2010,22(5):443
[4]詹燕平,游滨,陈移峰,等.论科技期刊审稿专家的选择与管理及其审稿积极性的调动[J].编辑学报,2014,26(6):572
[5]汪全伟,周海慧,黄东杰,等.关于科技期刊专家审稿超期的思考[J].编辑学报,2018,30(2):186
[6]刘凤华,陈立敏,李启明.科技期刊审稿专家的评价和改进措施[J].中国科技期刊研究,2016,27(8):859
[7]熊英,欧阳贱华.专家拒绝或延迟审稿原因分析及对策[J].编辑学报,2012,24(2):148
[8]李晓.影响科技期刊论文专家审稿质量的因素分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2014,25(11):1369
[9]王华生.学术稿件专家外审存在的问题与编辑控制[J].中国出版,2012(14):15
[10]王宝金.核科技期刊人情稿处理策略[J].编辑学报,2016,28(增刊1):S21