公路桥梁板式橡胶支座失效标准研究
|
摘要
通过对山西省3条高速公路上的板式橡胶支座进行现场调研,确定了该类型支座存在的主要病害问题是支座局部脱空和支座剪切变形.然后通过单轴拉伸试验、双轴拉伸试验和平面剪切试验得出运营桥梁支座实际的特性参数.通过建立板式橡胶支座的有限元模型,分析得出橡胶支座的极限脱空率和极限剪切角.最后通过软件试算,模拟局部脱空和剪切变形两种病害同时存在的情况下支座的受力,拟合出板式橡胶支座在两种病害同时作用下的失效判别公式和失效曲线,如果局部脱空和剪切变形的组合满足失效判别公式或者在失效曲线范围之外,说明支座失效.研究得出的失效标准可以为板式橡胶支座的更换提供依据,具有较高的工程应用价值.
In a on-site examination on the plate type elastomeric pad bearings on three expressways in Shaanxi Province,the main problems of this type of pad bearings were local cavitation and bearing shear deformation.Then the uniaxial tensile test,biaxial tensile test and plane shear test were carried out to obtain the actual characteristic parameters of bridge bearing.By establishing a finite element model of the plate rubber bearing,the ultimate void ratio and ultimate shear angle of the rubber bearing were obtained.Finally,through the software trial calculation,the simulation the force of the pad bearings was conducted with both the local cavitation and the shear deformation,the failure identification formula and the failure curve of the rubber bearing in the plate under the simultaneous action of the two diseases were fitted.If the combination of partial void and shear deformation satisfied the failure criteria or was outside the failure curve range,the bearing failure was indicated.The failure criterion obtained in this paper could cast extra light on the basis for the replacement of the plate rubber bearing,and were of great engineering application value.
In a on-site examination on the plate type elastomeric pad bearings on three expressways in Shaanxi Province,the main problems of this type of pad bearings were local cavitation and bearing shear deformation.Then the uniaxial tensile test,biaxial tensile test and plane shear test were carried out to obtain the actual characteristic parameters of bridge bearing.By establishing a finite element model of the plate rubber bearing,the ultimate void ratio and ultimate shear angle of the rubber bearing were obtained.Finally,through the software trial calculation,the simulation the force of the pad bearings was conducted with both the local cavitation and the shear deformation,the failure identification formula and the failure curve of the rubber bearing in the plate under the simultaneous action of the two diseases were fitted.If the combination of partial void and shear deformation satisfied the failure criteria or was outside the failure curve range,the bearing failure was indicated.The failure criterion obtained in this paper could cast extra light on the basis for the replacement of the plate rubber bearing,and were of great engineering application value.
引文
[1]包杰.斜曲连续梁桥板式橡胶支座设计关键技术研究[D].西安:长安大学公路学院,2015:7-8.
[2]郭红梅,周燕,张凯,等.大跨连续梁桥桩基础的减隔震分析[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2015,36(1):70-74.
[3]李建中,汤虎,管仲国.中小跨径板式橡胶支座梁桥新型隔震系统[J].中国公路学报,2015,28(3):35-43.
[4]吴刚,王克海,李冲,等.板式橡胶支座摩擦滑移特性参数分析[J].土木工程学报,2014,47(S1):108-112.
[5]袁磊,庄军生,张勇,等.基于橡胶总应变的板式橡胶支座失效条件判据[J].铁道建筑,2015,496(6):27-30.
[6]刘利.在役公路桥梁板式橡胶支座病害分析及对策研究[D].北京:中国铁道科学研究院铁道建筑研究所,2012:38-63.
[7]陶俊.支座失效对桥梁结构的影响及失效标准研究[D].西安:长安大学公路学院,2015:5-6.
[8]李昌荣.抗横移板式橡胶支座力学性能实验研究及数值分析[D].广州:华南理工大学土木与交通学院,2012:27-30.
[9]STEELMAN J S,FAHNESTOCK L A,FILIPOV E T,et al.Shear and friction response of nonseismic laminated elastomeric bridge bearings subject to seismic demands[J].Journal of bridge engineering,2013,18(7):612-623.
[10]TOPKAY C.Analysis of specimen size effects in inclined compression test on iaminated elastomeric bearings[J].Engineering structures,2004,26(8):1071-1080.
[11]TOPKAY C,JOSEPH A Y.Test method for determining the shear modulus of elastomeric beatings[J].Journal of structural engineering,2002,128(6):797-805.
[12]刘亚东,田杰.橡胶隔震支座拉伸性能试验研究[J].建筑科学,2015,31(7):63-67.
[13]NAJM H,PATEL R,NASSIF H.Evaluation of laminated circular elastomeric bearings[J].Journal of bridge engineering,2007,12(1):89-97.
[14]李冰,王少华,严情木.基于ABAQUS非线性接触分析的球型支座转动性能及结构分析[J].铁道建筑,2012,465(11):10-13.
[15]李瑞.板式橡胶支座本构试验及抗震性能研究[D].哈尔滨:中国地震局工程力学研究所地震工程与工程振动重点实验室,2016:31-41.
[2]郭红梅,周燕,张凯,等.大跨连续梁桥桩基础的减隔震分析[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2015,36(1):70-74.
[3]李建中,汤虎,管仲国.中小跨径板式橡胶支座梁桥新型隔震系统[J].中国公路学报,2015,28(3):35-43.
[4]吴刚,王克海,李冲,等.板式橡胶支座摩擦滑移特性参数分析[J].土木工程学报,2014,47(S1):108-112.
[5]袁磊,庄军生,张勇,等.基于橡胶总应变的板式橡胶支座失效条件判据[J].铁道建筑,2015,496(6):27-30.
[6]刘利.在役公路桥梁板式橡胶支座病害分析及对策研究[D].北京:中国铁道科学研究院铁道建筑研究所,2012:38-63.
[7]陶俊.支座失效对桥梁结构的影响及失效标准研究[D].西安:长安大学公路学院,2015:5-6.
[8]李昌荣.抗横移板式橡胶支座力学性能实验研究及数值分析[D].广州:华南理工大学土木与交通学院,2012:27-30.
[9]STEELMAN J S,FAHNESTOCK L A,FILIPOV E T,et al.Shear and friction response of nonseismic laminated elastomeric bridge bearings subject to seismic demands[J].Journal of bridge engineering,2013,18(7):612-623.
[10]TOPKAY C.Analysis of specimen size effects in inclined compression test on iaminated elastomeric bearings[J].Engineering structures,2004,26(8):1071-1080.
[11]TOPKAY C,JOSEPH A Y.Test method for determining the shear modulus of elastomeric beatings[J].Journal of structural engineering,2002,128(6):797-805.
[12]刘亚东,田杰.橡胶隔震支座拉伸性能试验研究[J].建筑科学,2015,31(7):63-67.
[13]NAJM H,PATEL R,NASSIF H.Evaluation of laminated circular elastomeric bearings[J].Journal of bridge engineering,2007,12(1):89-97.
[14]李冰,王少华,严情木.基于ABAQUS非线性接触分析的球型支座转动性能及结构分析[J].铁道建筑,2012,465(11):10-13.
[15]李瑞.板式橡胶支座本构试验及抗震性能研究[D].哈尔滨:中国地震局工程力学研究所地震工程与工程振动重点实验室,2016:31-41.