摘要
地被植物具有改土培肥能力,但其效果因品种而异。试验选取海南三亚园林绿化常用的地被植物地毯草(Axonopus compressus)、蔓花生(Arachis duranensis)、结缕草(Zoysia japonica Steud)、蟛蜞菊(Wedelia chinensis),以自然生草与清耕作为对照,对比分析了不同地被植物对土壤养分和土壤酶活性的影响。结果表明,土壤有机质、全氮和碱解氮含量以蟛蜞菊处理最高;土壤全磷、速效磷和速效钾含量均以自然生草处理最高而蟛蜞菊处理最低;土壤全钾含量以地毯草处理最高而自然生草处理最低。土壤蔗糖酶、脲酶和过氧化氢酶活性均以蟛蜞菊处理最高;土壤酸性磷酸酶活性则以自然生草处理最高而蟛蜞菊处理最低。土壤脲酶和过氧化氢酶活性与碱解氮含量极显著正相关(P<0.01),蔗糖酶活性与土壤有机质含量极显著正相关(P<0.01),酸性磷酸酶活性与土壤全磷、速效磷含量显著正相关(P<0.05)而与土壤全氮含量显著负相关(P<0.05)。
Garden cover plants can enrich and improve the soils, but the effect varied from different plant cultivers. The experiment was conducted with four different garden cover plants(Axonopus compressus, Arachis duranensis, Zoysia japonica Steud, Wedelia chinensis) which were widely used in horticulture of Sanya city, Hainan province, and the natural grass and clean tillage were as control,to analyze the different garden cover plants on soil nutrient contents and enzyme activities. The results showed that in all the six treatments, soil organic matter, total nitrogen and alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen content were highest in the W. chinensis treatment; soil total phosphorus, available phosphorus and available potassium content were highest in natural grass treatment but lowest in W. chinensis treatment; soil total potassium content was highest in A. compressus treatment but lowest in natural grass treatment. The activity of soil invertase, soil urease and soil catalase were highest in W. chinensis treatment, and the activity of soil acid phosphatase was highest in natural grass field but lowest in W. chinensis treatment. The activity of soil urease and catalase had significantly positive correlation with the soil alkali-hydrolyzale nitrogen content(P<0.01), the activity of soil invertase had significantly positive correlation with soil organic matter content(P<0.01), the activity of soil acid phosphatase had significant positive correlation with soil available phosphorus content(P<0.05) but significant negative correlation with soil total nitrogen content(P<0.05).
引文
[1]张玲慧,夏宜平.地被植物在园林中的应用及研究现状[J].中国园林,2003(9):58-61.
[2]杨承栋,焦如珍,屠星南,等.发育林下植被是恢复杉木人工林地力的重要途径[J].林业科学,1995(3):275-283.
[3]盛炜彤,杨承栋.关于杉木林下植被对改良土壤性质效用的研究[J].生态学报,1997(4):377-385.
[4]颜路明,郭祥泉.盐碱胁迫对香樟幼苗根际土壤酶活性的影响[J].土壤,2017,49(4):733-737.
[5]刘丽,徐明恺,汪思龙,等.杉木人工林土壤质量演变过程中土壤微生物群落结构变化[J].生态学报,2013,33(15):4692-4706.
[6]漆良华,张旭东,孙启祥,等.土壤-植被系统及其对土壤健康的影响[J].世界林业研究,2007(3):1-8.
[7]胡卫萱,丁峰,宋文华.绿化配置对城市土壤酶活性和有机质质量分数的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2009,37(9):115-116.
[8]柯展鸿,邱佩霞,胡东雄,等.三裂叶蟛蜞菊入侵对土壤酶活性和理化性质的影响[J].生态环境学报,2013,22(3):432-436.
[9]黄睿,郇恒福,高玲,等.不同豆科田菁属(Sesbania spp)绿肥对酸性土壤有机碳含量的影响[J].热带生物学报,2017,8(3):324-329.
[10]王慧敏,蔡洪月,何蓉蓉,等.间作芳香地被植物对茶园土壤理化性状及养分的影响[J].西南林业大学学报,2016,36(5):71-77.
[11]范林洁,邵学新,吴周,等.不同地被覆盖对新围海涂土壤性质的影响[J].华东森林经理,2008(1):24-27,32.
[12]付美云,杨宁,杨满元,等.衡阳紫色土丘陵坡地不同恢复阶段土壤微生物与养分的耦合关系[J].生态环境学报,2015,24(1):41-48.
[13]刘潮,冯玉龙,田耀华.紫茎泽兰入侵对土壤酶活性和理化因子的影响[J].植物研究,2007,27(6):729-735.
[14]李正,刘国顺,敬海霞,等.绿肥与化肥配施对植烟土壤微生物量及供氮能力的影响[J].草业学报,2011,20(6):126-134.
[15]陆建忠,裘伟,陈家宽,等.入侵种加拿大一枝黄花对土壤特性的影响[J].生物多样性,2005(4):347-356.
[16]徐华勤,肖润林,向佐湘,等.稻草覆盖、间作三叶草茶园土壤酶活性与养分的关系[J].生态学杂志,2009,28(8):1537-1543.
[17]雷瑞德,党坤良,张硕新,等.秦岭南坡中山地带华北落叶松人工林对土壤的影响[J].林业科学,1997(9):463-470.