管道内外壁缺陷的漏磁检测
|
摘要
为了更好地进行现场检测及缺陷定量分析,并探究缺陷类型及深度对漏磁场信号的影响,根据标准NB/T 47013.12-2015制备管件校准试件、对比试件和裂纹试件。利用可变径管道外壁的漏磁检测仪器对存在点蚀、裂纹等缺陷的38.1,50.8,76.2,101.6mm共4种管径的试件进行漏磁检测。结果表明,管外壁缺陷漏磁场信号强于内壁缺陷信号,内外壁漏磁场信号均随缺陷深度的增加而增强,槽形缺陷的漏磁场信号强于球形缺陷的漏磁场信号。
In order to better undertake field detection and quantitative analysis of defects,it is urgent to explore the effect of the type and depth of defects on the leakage magnetic field signal.According to the standard of NB/T47013.12-2015,the pipeline calibration specimen and the contrast specimen and the crack specimen were prepared.The diameter-variable magnetic flux leakage testing device outside pipeline was carried out on the pipe diameter of 38.1,50.8,76.2,101.6 mm,which were small defects such as pitting and crack.The experimental results show that the leakage magnetic field signal of the outer wall defect is stronger than that of the inner wall;the leakage magnetic field signal of the inner and outer wall is enhanced with the increase of the defect depth;the leakage magnetic field signal of the groove defect is stronger than that of the spherical defect.
In order to better undertake field detection and quantitative analysis of defects,it is urgent to explore the effect of the type and depth of defects on the leakage magnetic field signal.According to the standard of NB/T47013.12-2015,the pipeline calibration specimen and the contrast specimen and the crack specimen were prepared.The diameter-variable magnetic flux leakage testing device outside pipeline was carried out on the pipe diameter of 38.1,50.8,76.2,101.6 mm,which were small defects such as pitting and crack.The experimental results show that the leakage magnetic field signal of the outer wall defect is stronger than that of the inner wall;the leakage magnetic field signal of the inner and outer wall is enhanced with the increase of the defect depth;the leakage magnetic field signal of the groove defect is stronger than that of the spherical defect.
引文
[1]贾鹏军,罗金恒,刘琰,等.石化成品油外输管道泄漏的无损检测[J].无损检测,2016,38(3):11-13.
[2]戴光,郑克耀,杨志军,等.管道外自动漏磁检测技术及试验[J].无损检测,2017,39(7):18-22,45.
[3]高松巍,郑树林,杨理践.长输管道漏磁内检测缺陷识别方法[J].无损检测,2013,35(1):38-41.
[4]林猛,牛迎战.漏磁检测技术在成品油管道中的应用[J].化工机械,2011,38(5):618-619.
[5]杜金阳,范香,卜文海.油气管道检测技术现状和发展趋势[J].中国石油和化工标准与质量,2011,31(12):16.
[6]崔伟,黄松岭,赵伟.传感器提离值对管道漏磁检测的影响[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2007,47(1):21-24.
[7]杨志军,陈德姝,陈亮,等.腐蚀缺陷漏磁场检测有限元模拟[J].无损检测,2015,37(11):51-55,77.
[2]戴光,郑克耀,杨志军,等.管道外自动漏磁检测技术及试验[J].无损检测,2017,39(7):18-22,45.
[3]高松巍,郑树林,杨理践.长输管道漏磁内检测缺陷识别方法[J].无损检测,2013,35(1):38-41.
[4]林猛,牛迎战.漏磁检测技术在成品油管道中的应用[J].化工机械,2011,38(5):618-619.
[5]杜金阳,范香,卜文海.油气管道检测技术现状和发展趋势[J].中国石油和化工标准与质量,2011,31(12):16.
[6]崔伟,黄松岭,赵伟.传感器提离值对管道漏磁检测的影响[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2007,47(1):21-24.
[7]杨志军,陈德姝,陈亮,等.腐蚀缺陷漏磁场检测有限元模拟[J].无损检测,2015,37(11):51-55,77.