酿饲兼用型高粱和粮饲兼用型玉米饲用价值比较
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comparison of the feeding values of brewing-forage sorghum and grain-forage maize
  • 作者:柳金良 ; 郑琪 ; 孙志强 ; 柳发财 ; 石晓瑛
  • 英文作者:LIU Jinliang;ZHENG Qi;SUN Zhiqiang;LIU Facai;SHI Xiaoying;Pingliang Academy of Agricultural Sciences;
  • 关键词:酿饲兼用高粱 ; 粮饲兼用玉米 ; 经济效益 ; 营养成分 ; 饲用品质 ; 饲用能量 ; 饲用价值
  • 英文关键词:brewing-forage sorghum;;grain-forage maize;;economic benefits;;nutrition composition;;feed quality;;net energy;;feeding value
  • 中文刊名:CYKX
  • 英文刊名:Pratacultural Science
  • 机构:甘肃省平凉市农业科学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-15
  • 出版单位:草业科学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.36;No.306
  • 基金:甘肃省重大科技专项(2015GS05915-1);; 国家谷子高粱产业技术体系(CARS-06-04-07)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:CYKX201901020
  • 页数:8
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:62-1069/S
  • 分类号:168-175
摘要
为了比较不同种植方式下酿饲兼用高粱和粮饲兼用玉米的饲用价值,本研究以陇东旱塬露地种植的酿饲兼用高粱(Sorghum bicolor)和全膜双垄沟播种植的粮饲兼用玉米(Zea mays)为研究材料,进行了两者饲用物质产量的比较试验和经济效益分析,测定了其乳熟期全株和成熟期秸秆的营养成分和饲用价值,并从营养成分、饲用品质、和饲用能量等方面进行统计分析。结果表明:种植露地酿饲兼用高粱的经济效益高于全膜粮饲兼用玉米;乳熟期,露地酿饲兼用高粱饲用营养成分、饲用品质和饲用净能等大部分指标低于全膜粮饲兼用玉米,存在显著差异(P <0.05);成熟期结果与乳熟期相反,但二者秸秆营养成分、饲用品质和饲用净能等指标差异均不显著(P> 0.05);露地酿饲兼用高粱每公顷的粗蛋白产量、总可消化养分、干物质产奶净能高于粮饲兼用玉米,差异极显著(P <0.01)。露地种植酿饲兼用高粱的经济效益和成熟期秸秆饲用价值优于全膜玉米,建议在西北旱作区露地种植酿饲兼用高粱代替全膜粮饲兼用玉米。
        To compare the feeding values of brewing-forage sorghum(Sorghum bicolor) and rain-forage maize(Zea mays)under different planting methods,we studied brewing-forage sorghum planted in an open field and grain-forage maize planted by whole field surface plastic mulching and double ridge-furrowing in Longdong dryland.A feed material yield comparison test and an economic benefit analysis of the two crops were carried out.Additionally,the nutritional composition,feeding value,and net energy were analyzed both at the milk stage of the whole plant and in mature straw.The results showed that the economic benefit of planting brewing-forage sorghum in an open field is higher than that of grainforage maize planted by whole field surface plastic mulching and double ridge-furrowing.Most indicators of nutritional composition,feed quality,and net energy of brewing-forage sorghum were significantly lower than those of grain-forage maize at the milk stage(P<0.05).At the mature stage,the opposite results were observed,but the differences were not significant(P>0.05).The crude protein yield,total digestible nutrients,and dry matter milk net value of brewing-forage sorghum per hectare were higher than those of grain-forage maize,showing extremely significant differences(P<0.01).The economic benefit and feeding value of brewing-forage sorghum straw planted in an open field were better than those of whole film grain-forage maize at the mature stage.Thus,brewing-forage sorghum should be planted in an open field rather than under whole film double furrow sowing that is used for grain-forage maize in the northwest dry farming area of China.
引文
[1]张福耀,吴树彪,柳青山.影响高粱饲用价值主要内在因素及其对策.动物营养学报,2016,28(1):1-8.ZHANG F Y,WU S B,LIU Q S.Main internal factors of influencing sorghum feeding value and its countermeasures.Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2016,28(1):1-8.
    [2]唐军,王文强,黄春琼,白昌军.玉米育种技术研究进展.热带农业科学,2017,37(5):42-50,71.TANG J,WANG W Q,HUANG C Q,BAI C J.Research advances in breeding of maize.Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture,2017,37(5):42-50,71.
    [3]于福安,段有厚,吴庆凯,王艳秋,卜祥.辽宁省饲料高粱的发展及推广应用.杂粮作物,2008,28(1):55-56.YU F A,DUAN Y H,WU Q K,WANG Y Q,PU X.The development and application of forage sorghum in Liaoning.Rain Fed Crops,2008,28(1):55-56.
    [4]邹剑秋,朱凯,张志鹏,黄先伟.国内外高粱深加工研究现状与发展前景.杂粮作物,2002,22(5):296-298.ZOU J Q,ZHU K,ZHANG Z P,HUANG X W.Status and prospects of research on sorghum deep processing at home and abroad.Rain Fed Crops,2002,22(5):296-298.
    [5]陈艳,王之盛,张晓明,吴发莉,邹华围.常用粗饲料营养成分和饲用价值分析.草业学报,2015,24(5):117-125.CHEN Y,WANG Z S,ZHANG X M,WU F L,ZOU H W.Analysis of the nutritional components and feeding values of commonly used roughages.Acta prataculturae Sinica,2015,24(5):117-125.
    [6]唐博,柳景然,刘金锐.玉米及其加工副产品的营养价值分析.现代畜牧科技,2017,9:54.TANG B,LIU J R,LIU J R.Analysis on the nutritional value of corn and its processed by-products.Modern Animal Husbandry Science and Technology,2017,9:54.
    [7]玛里兰·毕克塔依尔,古丽米拉·拜看,哈丽代·热合木江,阿不都热西提·伊地力,艾比布拉·伊马木.不同添加剂对玉米秸秆为主的TMR青贮发酵品质及饲用价值的影响.安徽农业科学,2016,44(3):67-69,73.Malilan·Biketayier,Gulimila·Baikan,Halidai·Rehemujiang,Abudurexiti·Ydili,aibibula·yimamu.Effects of different additives on the fermentation quality and feed value of tmr silage based on corn stalk.Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences,2016,44(3):67-69,73.
    [8]赵丽敏.不同抗旱性玉米和高粱品种的水力结构特性研究.杨凌:西北农林科技大学硕士学位论文,2012.ZHAO L M.Hydraulic architecture traits in maize and sorghum of differing drought resistance.Master Thesis.Yangling:North West Agriculture and Forestry University,2012.
    [9]山仑,徐炳成.论高粱的抗旱性在旱区农业中的地位.中国农业科学,2009,42(7):2342-2348.SHAN L,XU B C.Discussion on drought resistance of sorghum and itsstatus in agriculture in arid and semiarid regions.Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2009,42(7):2342-2348.
    [10]邵艳军,山仑.高粱抗旱机理研究进展.中国农学通报,2004,20(3):120-123.SHAO Y J,SHAN L.Advances in the research of drought resistance in sorghum.Chinses Agricultural Science Bulletin,2004,20(3):120-123.
    [11]段爱旺,张寄阳.中国灌溉农田粮食作物水分利用效率的研究.农业工程学报,2000,16(4):41-44.DUAN A W,ZHANG J Y.Water use eff iciency of grain crops in irrigated farmland in china.Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2000,16(4):41-44.
    [12]梁文英,邢辉,王睿勇.聚乙二醇模拟干旱条件下玉米和高粱的生理指标比较.江苏农业科学,2012,40(7):89-91.LIANG W Y,XING H,WANG R Y.Comparison of physiological indexes of maize and sorghum under simulated drought conditions with polyethylene glycol.Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2012,40(7):89-91.
    [13]邵艳军.高粱、玉米苗期抗旱生理与分子机制的比较研究.杨凌:西北农林科技大学博士学位论文,2005.SHAO Y J.A comparative study between sorghum and maize on the physiological and molecular mechanism of mater mtress mesistance.PhD Thesis.Yangling:North West Agriculture and Forestry University,2005.
    [14]柳金良,郑琪,孙志强,柳发财,石晓英,贺春贵.西北旱作区酿饲兼用高粱育种目标与策略.现代农业科技,2017,14:25-28.LIU J L,ZHENG Q,SUN Z Q,LIU F C,SHI X Y,HE C G.Breeding objectives and strategy for brewing-forage sorghum in northwest dry farming areas.Modern Agricultural Science and Technology,2017,14:25-28.
    [15]杜学武.酿饲兼用高粱杂交种平杂8号选育报告.甘肃农业科技,2006,1:6-8.DU X W.Breeding report on hybrid brewing-forage sorghum of Pingza No.8.Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology,2006,1:6-8.
    [16]刘广才,杨祁峰,李来祥,樊廷录,赵小文,朱永永.旱地玉米全膜双垄沟播技术土壤水分效应研究.干旱地区农业研究,2008,26(6):18-28.LIU G C,YANG Q F,LI L X,FAN T L,ZHAO X W,ZHU Y Y.Study on soil water effects of the techniques of whole plastic-film mulching ondouble ridges and planting in catchment furrows of dryland corn.Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas,2008,26(6):18-28.
    [17]吕洁婷.秸秆还田与地膜覆盖对土壤理化性状影响.兰州:兰州大学硕士学位论文,2014.LUY J T.Effects of straw incorporation and plastic film mulch on soil physicochemical properties.Master Thesis.Lanzhou:Lanzhou University,2014.
    [18]徐文,熊春蓉,张永祥,杨祁峰,牛芬菊,张雷.全膜双垄沟播与秸秆还田技术对土壤理化特性及玉米产量的影响.农业现代化研究,2013,34(2):226-229.XU W Q,XIONG C R,ZHANG Y X,YANG Q F,NIU F J,ZHANG L.Effect of full coverage on double ridges with furrow planting and stalk returned to field technology on soil physical and chemical characteristics and maize yield.Research of Agricultural Modernization,2013,34(2):226-229.
    [19]谢军红,柴强,李玲玲,张仁陟,牛伊宁,罗珠珠,蔡立群.黄土高原半干旱区不同覆膜连作玉米产量的水分承载时限研究.中国农业科学,2015,48(8):1558-1568.XIE J H,CHAI Q,LI L L,ZHANG R Z,NIU Y N,LUO Z Z,CAI L Q.The time loading limitation of continuous cropping maize yield under different plastic film mulching modes in semi-arid region of Loess Plateau of China.Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2015,48(8):1558-1568.
    [20]王红丽,张绪成,宋尚有,马一凡,于显枫.西北黄土高原旱地全膜双垄沟播种植对玉米季节性耗水和产量的调节机制.中国农业科学,2013,46(5):917-926.WANG H L,ZHANG X C,SONG S Y,MA Y F,YU X F.Regulation of whole field surface plastic mulching and double ridgefurrow planting on seasonal soil water loss and maize yield in rain-fed area of northwest Loess Plateau.Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2013,46(5):917-926.
    [21]柳金良,郑琪.西北低海拔干旱地区以高粱代替全膜玉米的可行性分析.现代农业科技,2016,5:69-72.LIU J L,ZHENG Q.Feasibility analysis of replacing complete mulched planting maize with sorghum in low altitude arid area in Northwest China.Modern Agricultural Science and Technology,2016,5:69-72.
    [22]赵娅娅,韩成龙,孔猛,王超花,贾宇,李凤民.半干旱黄土高原农牧交错区高粱和玉米的生态效益及经济效益比较.北京:中国科技论文在线[2015-03-05].http://www.paper.edu.cn/releasepaper/content/201503-97.ZHAO Y Y,HAN C L,KONG M,WANG C H,JIA Y,LI F M.Ecological and economic benifits comparison between sorghum and maize in farming-pastoral ecotone in the semiarid Loess Plateau.Beijing:Sciencepaper Online[2015-03-05].http://www.paper.edu.cn/releasepaper/content/201503-97.
    [23]贺春贵,何振富,王斐.夏播复种光敏型高丹草的养分含量与产量.草业学报,2017,26(7):177-189.HE C G,HE Z F,WANG F.Nutrient contents and yields of photoperiod-sensitive Sorghum-Sudangrass hybrids grown in summer after a winter wheat crop.Acta prataculturae Sinica,2017,26(7):177-189.
    [24]陈艳,王之盛,张晓明,吴发莉,邹华围.常用粗饲料营养成分和饲用价值分析.草业学报,2015,24(5):117-125.CHEN Y,WANG Z S,ZHANG X M,WU F L,ZOU H W.Analysis of the nutritional components and feeding values of commonly used roughages.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2015,24(5):117-125.
    [25]张吉鹍,卢德勋,刘建新,包赛娜,邹庆华,刘庆华.粗饲料品质评定指数的研究现状及其进展.草业科学,2004,21(9):55-61.ZHANG J K,LU DE X,LIU J X,BAO S N,ZOU Q H,LIU Q H.The present research situation and progress of crude fodder quality evaluation index.Pratacultural Science,2004,21(9):55-61.
    [26]冯仰廉,周建民,张晓明,丁晓明,陆治年.我国奶牛饲料产奶净能值测算方法的研究.中国畜牧杂志,1987(1):6-9.FENG Y L,ZHOU J M,ZHANG X M,DING X M,LU Z N.Regression equation for estimating the NEL value of feeds for dairy cows.Chinese Journal of Animal Science,1987(1):6-9.
    [27]刘会芳,南志标,唐增,王丽佳.苜蓿、小麦、玉米经济效益比较.草业科学,2016,33(5):990-995.LIU H F,NAN Z B,TANG Z,WANG L J.Comparison of economic benefit of alfalfa,wheat and maize.Pratacultural Science,2016,33(5):990-995.
    [28]CHOI K J,CHIN M S,PARK K Y,KIM S L,CHUNG T W,LEE H S.Segregation of stay-green characters in an F2 population.Korean Journal of Breeding,1995,69:123.
    [29]李珊珊,李飞,白彦福,尚占环.甜高粱饲用价值及饲喂奶牛技术.草业科学,2017,34(7):1534-1541.LI S S,LI F,BAI Y F,SHANG Z H.Sweet sorghum feeding value and dairy cows.Pratacultural Science,2017,34(7):1534-1541.
    [30]闫慧颖,李春喜,叶培麟,毛德虎,李荣.种植密度和施肥水平对青海旱地覆膜种植甜高粱草产量及品质的影响.草业科学,2017,34(12):2512-2520.YAN H Y,LI C X,YE P L,MAO D H,LI R.Effects of different planting densities and fertilization levels on yield and quality of sweet Sorghum grown under covering film cultivation in the dry land of Qinghai.Pratacultural Science,2017,34(12):2512-2520.
    [31]BEAN B,MARSALIS M.Corn and sorghum silage production considerations.High Plains Dairy Conference,2012(3):1-7.
    [32]BELL J,BYNUM E,MCCOLLUM T,SCHNELL R,SIRMON P,NAYLOR C,FINCH B,PIETSCH D,HORN K.2017 Texas A&M AgriLife Bushland Forage Sorghum Silage Trial.Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension,2017:1-49.
    [33]綦群高.以生态经济系统观点论高产优质高效农业.南京农业大学学报,1995,18(3):105-109.QI Q G.Discussion on agriculture with high output,quality and efficiency from the viewpoint of eco-economic system.Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University,1995,18(3):105-109.
    [34]钱文荣,赵金龙.略论农业生产中生态经济综合协调发展.新疆农垦经济,2000,4:9-11.QIAN W R,ZHAO J L.A brief discussion on the comprehensive and coordinated development of ecological economy in agricultural production.Xinjiang State Farms Economy,2000,4:9-11.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700