我国竞技体育市场化改革:制度变迁的阶段划分、变迁特征及其启示
|
摘要
总结历史旨在镜鉴未来,为进一步提高我国竞技体育市场化改革水平,理顺其时代脉络、分析其改革特征就显得尤为重要。为此,运用文献资料法和逻辑分析法,对我国竞技体育市场化改革制度变迁的阶段划分与特征表现以及由此产生的启示进行了分析。研究得出:我国竞技体育市场化改革可以认为是一场制度变迁。按照制度的供需关系,我国竞技体育市场化改革制度变迁可分为准备期、起步期、暂缓期、突破期和深化期五个阶段。其特征主要表现为:变迁方向上,市场开放度逐渐提高,政府主导路径依赖痕迹显著;变迁模式上,通过自上而下的强制与自下而上的需求诱致结合所致;变迁动因上,相关利益主体围绕自身利益展开的博弈为根本因素,内因和外因共同发挥作用;变迁节奏上,表现为弹性式的渐进边际调整。最后提出:我国竞技体育市场化改革应对举国体制给予辩证扬弃,着重围绕市场这一发展主线,改革进程中应彰显一定的人文关怀并以各方利益的共赢共享为其诉求。
To review the history of the marketization of competitive sports in China helps further the reform the competitive sports market. The analysis of stages and characteristics of institutional changes showed that the competitive market experienced the preparatory, initial, bottleneck, acceleration and deepening stages. The market became more transparent and it was still mainly dominated by the government. The market was pushed forward by the top-down control, bottom-up needs and game between the stakeholders through elastic progressive margin adjustment. The reform of the competitive market should centre around the government dominant system and take into consideration of humanistic concern and of win-win cooperation based on interests of all parties.
To review the history of the marketization of competitive sports in China helps further the reform the competitive sports market. The analysis of stages and characteristics of institutional changes showed that the competitive market experienced the preparatory, initial, bottleneck, acceleration and deepening stages. The market became more transparent and it was still mainly dominated by the government. The market was pushed forward by the top-down control, bottom-up needs and game between the stakeholders through elastic progressive margin adjustment. The reform of the competitive market should centre around the government dominant system and take into consideration of humanistic concern and of win-win cooperation based on interests of all parties.
引文
[1] 贺卫,伍山林.制度经济学[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2003.
[2] 鲁鹏.实践与理论:制度变迁主要流派[M].济南:山东人民出版社,2008.
[3] 洪名勇.制度经济学[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2012,6.
[4] 陈朝宗.制度学理论与我国制度创新实践[M].北京:中共中央党校出版社,2008,8.
[5] 诺斯.经济史中的结构与变迁[M].上海:三联书店出版社,1994.
[6] 熊晓正,夏思永等.我国竞技体育发展模式的研究[M].北京:人民体育出版社,2008:28-29.
[7] 李娜.独自上场[M].北京:中信出版社.2012,8.
[8] 时晓虹,耿刚德等.”路径依赖”理论新解[J].经济学家,2014(6):53-64.
[9] 李中.我国经济发展方式转变中的制度创新[D].北京:中共中央党校,2012.
[10] 卢现祥.西方新制度经济学[M].北京:中国发展出版社,1996.
[11] 彭国强,舒盛芳.回顾与思考:美国竞技体育成长因素及其特征[J].沈阳体育学院学报,2017,36(5):28-35.
[2] 鲁鹏.实践与理论:制度变迁主要流派[M].济南:山东人民出版社,2008.
[3] 洪名勇.制度经济学[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2012,6.
[4] 陈朝宗.制度学理论与我国制度创新实践[M].北京:中共中央党校出版社,2008,8.
[5] 诺斯.经济史中的结构与变迁[M].上海:三联书店出版社,1994.
[6] 熊晓正,夏思永等.我国竞技体育发展模式的研究[M].北京:人民体育出版社,2008:28-29.
[7] 李娜.独自上场[M].北京:中信出版社.2012,8.
[8] 时晓虹,耿刚德等.”路径依赖”理论新解[J].经济学家,2014(6):53-64.
[9] 李中.我国经济发展方式转变中的制度创新[D].北京:中共中央党校,2012.
[10] 卢现祥.西方新制度经济学[M].北京:中国发展出版社,1996.
[11] 彭国强,舒盛芳.回顾与思考:美国竞技体育成长因素及其特征[J].沈阳体育学院学报,2017,36(5):28-35.