基于清晰集定性比较分析方法的科技创新政策组合供给模式研究
|
摘要
基于31个省(市、区)政策文本,运用QCA方法对不同政策类型下具体政策手段的组合效用进行分析。研究发现:直接给予必要的税收减免对于提升创新产出具有显著激发作用,以金融环境优化及高端人才吸引等政策相组合的外界拉动模式和以企业融资减负及企业人才培养等政策相组合的内部推动模式对于促进创新成效显著,而资助政策整体效用不明显。
Based on the policy texts of 31 provinces in China,this paper analyzes the mix utility of specific policy measures under different policy types by QCA method. Results show that,tax deductions have a significant stimulating effect on enhancing the innovation output. The Polling Outside Mode of mix financial environment optimization policy and elite talent attraction policy,the Pushing Inside Mode of mix corporate finance burden reduction policy and the corporate talent cultivation policy have achieved remarkable results in promoting innovation,and the funding policy has no obvious effect on innovation output.
Based on the policy texts of 31 provinces in China,this paper analyzes the mix utility of specific policy measures under different policy types by QCA method. Results show that,tax deductions have a significant stimulating effect on enhancing the innovation output. The Polling Outside Mode of mix financial environment optimization policy and elite talent attraction policy,the Pushing Inside Mode of mix corporate finance burden reduction policy and the corporate talent cultivation policy have achieved remarkable results in promoting innovation,and the funding policy has no obvious effect on innovation output.
引文
[1]Flanagan K,Uyarra E,Laranja M.Reconceptualising the‘Policy Mix’for Innovation[J].Research Policy,2011,40(5):702-713.
[2]Rogge K S,Reichardt K.Policy Mixes for Sustainability Transitions:An Extended Concept and Framework for Analysis[J].Research Policy,2016,45(8):1620-1635.
[3]刘凤朝,马荣康.公共科技政策对创新产出的影响---基于印度的模型构建与实证分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理.2012(5):5-14.
[4]徐喆,李春艳.我国科技政策组合特征及其对产业创新的影响研究[J].科学学研究,2017,35(1):45-53.
[5]张永安,耿喆,王燕妮.区域科技创新政策分类与政策工具挖掘---基于中关村数据的研究[J].科技进步与对策.2015,32(17),116-122.
[6]Onishi A.A New Challenge to Economic Science:Global Model Simulation[J].Journal of Policy Modeling,2010,32(1):1-46.
[7]李晨光,张永安.区域创新政策对企业创新效率影响的实证研究[J].科研管理.2014(9):25-35.
[8]Yang CH,Huang CH,Hou TC.Tax Incentives and R&D Activity:Firm-level Evidence From Taiwan[J].Research Policy,2012,41(9):1578-1588.
[9]李平,刘利利,李蕾蕾.政府研发资助是否促进了技术进步---来自66个国家和地区的证据[J].科学学研究,2016,34(11):1625-1636.
[10]Lee C Y.The Differential Effects of Public R&D Support on Firm R&D:Theory and Evidence from Multi-country Data[J].Technovation,2011,31(5-6):256-269.
[11]Alecke B,Mitze T,Reinkowski J,et al.Does Firm Size Make a Difference?Analysing the Effectiveness of R&D Subsidies in East Germany[J].German Economic Review,2012,13(2):174-195
[12]吴超鹏,唐菂.知识产权保护执法力度、技术创新与企业绩效---来自中国上市公司的证据[J].经济研究,2016(11):125-139.
[13]程聪,贾良定.我国企业跨国并购驱动机制研究---基于清晰集的定性比较分析[J].南开管理评论,2016,19(6):113-121.
(1)~表示不存在,~A即A条件不满足。
(2)因国家统计局目前最新专利授权公开数据截至2016年底,为保证时间截面统一,政策收集年限及专利执法数据采集年份均为2016年。
(3)柱状图主要表现税收、金融、人才、资助政策收集到的条目数,知识产权保护强度原始数据为[0,1]区间的标准化系数,为保持与当地政策的可比性,乘10后也列入柱状图。
[2]Rogge K S,Reichardt K.Policy Mixes for Sustainability Transitions:An Extended Concept and Framework for Analysis[J].Research Policy,2016,45(8):1620-1635.
[3]刘凤朝,马荣康.公共科技政策对创新产出的影响---基于印度的模型构建与实证分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理.2012(5):5-14.
[4]徐喆,李春艳.我国科技政策组合特征及其对产业创新的影响研究[J].科学学研究,2017,35(1):45-53.
[5]张永安,耿喆,王燕妮.区域科技创新政策分类与政策工具挖掘---基于中关村数据的研究[J].科技进步与对策.2015,32(17),116-122.
[6]Onishi A.A New Challenge to Economic Science:Global Model Simulation[J].Journal of Policy Modeling,2010,32(1):1-46.
[7]李晨光,张永安.区域创新政策对企业创新效率影响的实证研究[J].科研管理.2014(9):25-35.
[8]Yang CH,Huang CH,Hou TC.Tax Incentives and R&D Activity:Firm-level Evidence From Taiwan[J].Research Policy,2012,41(9):1578-1588.
[9]李平,刘利利,李蕾蕾.政府研发资助是否促进了技术进步---来自66个国家和地区的证据[J].科学学研究,2016,34(11):1625-1636.
[10]Lee C Y.The Differential Effects of Public R&D Support on Firm R&D:Theory and Evidence from Multi-country Data[J].Technovation,2011,31(5-6):256-269.
[11]Alecke B,Mitze T,Reinkowski J,et al.Does Firm Size Make a Difference?Analysing the Effectiveness of R&D Subsidies in East Germany[J].German Economic Review,2012,13(2):174-195
[12]吴超鹏,唐菂.知识产权保护执法力度、技术创新与企业绩效---来自中国上市公司的证据[J].经济研究,2016(11):125-139.
[13]程聪,贾良定.我国企业跨国并购驱动机制研究---基于清晰集的定性比较分析[J].南开管理评论,2016,19(6):113-121.
(1)~表示不存在,~A即A条件不满足。
(2)因国家统计局目前最新专利授权公开数据截至2016年底,为保证时间截面统一,政策收集年限及专利执法数据采集年份均为2016年。
(3)柱状图主要表现税收、金融、人才、资助政策收集到的条目数,知识产权保护强度原始数据为[0,1]区间的标准化系数,为保持与当地政策的可比性,乘10后也列入柱状图。