制度逻辑研究的文献计量分析
|
摘要
以Web of Science数据库收录的制度逻辑文献为研究对象,采用文献计量方法对制度逻辑研究的文献外部特征和学科知识结构及其研究热点与趋势进行分析。研究发现:第一,制度逻辑研究领域的学科知识结构由6个部分构成:竞争逻辑、制度变迁与组织实践;制度与组织关系研究;多重制度环境、混合型组织和制度创业;多重制度逻辑、竞争逻辑与组织战略反应;制度化、制度理论与制度变迁;组织合法性、组织场域与战略反应。第二,制度逻辑研究热点趋势主要包括竞争逻辑下的组织战略反应、制度创业与合法性、新兴经济体国家的制度逻辑与组织战略反应以及不同层次政府制度逻辑对组织影响等4大主题类团。最后,提出制度逻辑可拓展的研究领域和研究方法,以期为制度逻辑学术
This paper uses bibliometric analysis method to investigate the external features,scientific knowledge structure,hotspots and trends of institutional logics field based on Web of Science database from its launch in 1998 to 2015,and obtains the following results:First,the scientific knowledge structure of institutional logics research field consists of six parts: competing logics,institutional change and organizational practice; the relationship between institutions and organizations; multiple institutional environments,hybrid organizations and institutional entrepreneurship; multiple institutional logics,competing logics and organizational strategic response; institutionalization,institutional theory and institutional change; organizational legitimacy,organizational field and strategic response. Second,the hotspots and trends of institutional logics researches are composed of four types of theme groups: organizational strategic response under competing logics; institutional entrepreneurship and legitimacy; institutional logics and organizational strategic response in emerging economies; influence of different levels of government institutional logics on organizations. Finally,some suggestions are put forward about the future academic research direction and management practice of institutional logics.
This paper uses bibliometric analysis method to investigate the external features,scientific knowledge structure,hotspots and trends of institutional logics field based on Web of Science database from its launch in 1998 to 2015,and obtains the following results:First,the scientific knowledge structure of institutional logics research field consists of six parts: competing logics,institutional change and organizational practice; the relationship between institutions and organizations; multiple institutional environments,hybrid organizations and institutional entrepreneurship; multiple institutional logics,competing logics and organizational strategic response; institutionalization,institutional theory and institutional change; organizational legitimacy,organizational field and strategic response. Second,the hotspots and trends of institutional logics researches are composed of four types of theme groups: organizational strategic response under competing logics; institutional entrepreneurship and legitimacy; institutional logics and organizational strategic response in emerging economies; influence of different levels of government institutional logics on organizations. Finally,some suggestions are put forward about the future academic research direction and management practice of institutional logics.
引文
[1]Thornton P.H.Markets from Culture:Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing[M].Stanford,CA:Stanford University Press,2004
[2]Feiedland R.,Alford R.R.Bringing Society Back in:Symbols,Practices,and Institutional Contradictions[A]//Powell W.W.and Di Maggio P.J.(Eds.).The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis[C].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1991
[3]Bhappu A.D.The Japanese Family:An Institutional Logic for Japanese Corporate Networks and Japanese Management[J].Academy of Management Review,2000,25(2):409-415
[4]Miller D.,Le Breton-Miller I.,Lester R.Family and Lone Founder Ownership and Strategic Behavior:Social Context,Identity,and Institutional Logics[J].Journal of Management Studies,2010,48(1):1-25
[5]Thornton P.H.,Ocasio W.Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations:Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry,1958-1990[J].American Journal of Sociology,1999,105(3):801-843
[6]Thornton P.H.The Rise of the Corporation in a Craft Industry:Conflict and Conformity in Institutional Logics[J].Academy of Management Journal,2002,45(1):81-101
[7]Greenwood R.,Diaz A.M.,Li S.X.,et al.The Multiplicity of Institutional Logics and the Heterogeneity of Organizational Responses[J].Organization Science,2010,21(2):521-539
[8]Greenwood R.,Raynard M.,Kodeih M.,et al.Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses[J].Academy of Management Annals,2011,5(1):317-371
[9]Blatter J.Beyond Hierarchies and Networks:Institutional Logics and Change in Transboundary Spaces[J].Governance,2003,16(4):503-526
[10]魏泽龙,谷盟.转型情景下企业合法性与绿色绩效的关系研究[J].管理评论,2015,27(4):76-84
[11]宋铁波,吴小节,汪秀琼.制度差异、企业跨区域经营经验与市场进入模式[J].管理评论,2016,28(4):166-177
[12]Tracey P.,Phillips N.,Jarvis O.Bridging Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Creation of New Organizational Forms:A Multilevel Model[J].Organization Science,2011,22(1):60-80
[13]Lepoutre J.M.W.N.,Valente M.Fools Breaking Out:The Role of Symbolic and Material Immunity in Explaining Institutional Nonconformity[J].Academy of Management Journal,2012,55(2):285-313
[14]Jones R.Organizational Culture Evolution:An Imprinting Perspective[J].Journal of Organizational Change Management,2014,27(6):973-994
[15]Gubbi S.R.,Aulakh P.S.,Ray S.International Search Behavior of Business Group Affiliated Firms:Scope of Institutional Changes and Intragroup Heterogeneity[J].Organization Science,2015,26(5):1485-1501
[16]武立东,王凯.独立董事制度从“规制”到“认知”的变迁——来自主板上市公司的证据[J].管理评论,2014,26(7):9-19
[17]刘则渊.科学知识图谱:方法与应用[M].北京:人民出版社,2007
[18]陶晓波,杨学成,许研.社会化商务研究述评与展望[J].管理评论,2015,27(11):75-85
[19]龚丽敏,魏江,董忆,等.商业模式研究现状和流派识别——基于1997-2010年SSCI引用情况的分析[J].管理评论,2013,25(6):131-140
[20]Callon M.,Courtial J.P.,Laville F.Co-word Analysis as a Tool for Describing the Network of Interactions between Basic and Technological Research:The Case of Polymer Chemistry[J].Scientometrics,1991,22(1):155-205
[21]Law J.,Bauin S.,Courtial J.P.,et al.Policy and the Mapping of Scientific Change:A Co-word Analysis of Research into Environmental Acidification[J].Scientometrics,1988,14(3):251-264
[22]Meyer J.W.,Rowan B.Institutionalized Organizations:Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony[J].American Journal of Sociology,1977,83(2):440-463
[23]Di Maggio P.J.,Powell W.W.The Iron Cage Revisited:Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in OrganizationalFields[J].American Sociological Review,1983,48(2):147-160
[24]Lounsbury M.A Tale of Two Cities:Competing Logics and Practice Variation in the Professionalizing of Mutual Funds[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(2):289-307
[25]Reay T.,Hinings C.R.Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics[J].Organization Studies,2009,30(6):629-652
[26]Scott W.R.,Ruef M.,Mendel P.J.,et al.Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations:From Professional Dominance to Managed Care[M].University of Chicago Press,2000
[27]Thornton P.H.,Ocasio W.,Lounsbury M.The Institutional Logics Perspective:A New Approach to Culture,Structure,and Process[M].London:Oxford University Press,2012
[28]Scott W.R.Institutions and Organizations[M].Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage,1995
[29]North D.C.Institutions,Institutional Change,and Economic Performance[M].London:Cambridge University Press,1990
[30]Hoffman A.J.Institutional Evolution and Change:Environmentalism and the US Chemical Industry[J].Academy of Management Journal,1999,42(4):351-371
[31]Oliver C.Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes[J].Academy of Management Review,1991,16(1):145-179
[32]Greenwood R.,Hinings C.R.Understanding Radical Organizational Change:Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism[J].Academy of Management Review,1996,21(4):1022-1054
[33]Pache A.,Santos F.When Worlds Collide:The Internal Dynamics of Organizational Responses to Conflicting Institutional Demands[J].Academy of Management Review,2010,35(3):455-476
[34]Binder A.For Love and Money:Organizations’Creative Responses to Multiple Environmental Logics[J].Theory and Society,2007,36(6):547-571
[35]Kraatz M.S.,Block E.S.Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism[A]//Greenwood R.,Oliver C.,Sahlin K.,Suddaby R.(Eds.),The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism[C].London:Sage,2008
[36]Dunn M.B.,Jones C.Institutional Logics and Institutional Pluralism:The Contestation of Care and Science Logics in Medical Education,1967-2005[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2010,55(1):114-149
[37]Battilana J.,Dorado S.Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations:The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations[J].Academy of Management Journal,2010,53(6):1419-1440
[38]Greenwood R.,Suddaby R.Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields:The Big Five Accounting Firms[J].Academy of Management Journal,2006,49(1):27-48
[39]Rao H.,Durand R.,Monin P.Institutional Change in Toque Ville:Nouvelle Cuisine as an Identity Movement in French Gastronomy[J].American Journal of Sociology,2003,108(4):795-843
[40]Meyer R.E.,Hammerschmid G.Changing Institutional Logics and Executive Identities:A Managerial Challenge to Public Administration in Austria[J].American Behavioral Scientist,2006,49(7):1000-1014
[41]Marquis C.,Lounsbury M.Vive La Résistence:Competing Logics and the Consolidation of U.S.Community Banking[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(4):799-820
[42]Thornton P.H.,Ocasio W.Institutional Logics.In Greenwood R.,Oliver C.,Sahlin K.,Suddaby R.(Eds.),The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism[C].London:Sage,2008
[43]Purdy J.M.,Gray B.Conflicting Logics,Mechanisms of Diffusion,and Multilevel Dynamics in Emerging Institutional Fields[J].Academy of Management Journal,2009,52(2):355-380
[44]Oliver C.The Antecedents of Deinstitutionalization[J].Organization Studies,1992,13(4):563-588
[45]Fligstein N.Social Skill and Institutional Theory[J].American Behavioral Scientist,1997,40(4):397-405
[46]Seo M.G.,Creed W.E.D.Institutional Contradictions,Praxis,and Institutional Change:A Dialectical Perspective[J].Academy of Management Review,2002,27(7):222-247
[47]Greenwood R.,Suddaby R.,Hinings C.R.Theorizing Change:The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutional Fields[J].Academy of Management Journal,2002,45(1):58-80
[48]Zilber T.B.Institutionalization as an Interplay between Actions,Meanings and Actors:The Case of a Rape Crisis Center in Israel[J].Academy of Management Journal,2002,45(1):234-254
[49]Maguire S.,Hardy C.,Lawrence T.B.Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields:HIV/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada[J].Academy of Management Journal,2004,47(5):657-679
[50]Glynn M.A.,Lounsbury M.From the Critics’Corner:Logic Blending,Discursive Change and Authenticity in a Cultural Production System[J].Journal of Management Studies,2005,42(5):1031-1055
[51]Zucker L.G.The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence[J].American Sociological Review,1977,42(5):726-743
[52]Tolbert P.S.,Zucker L.G.Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations:The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform,1880-1935[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1983,28(1):22-39
[53]Di Maggio P.J.Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory[M].Institutional Patterns and Organizations:Culture and Environment,1988
[54]Powell W.W.Expanding the Scope of Institutional Analysis[A]//Powell W.W.and Di Maggio P.J.(Eds.).The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis[C].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1991
[55]Leblebici H.,Salancik G.,Copay A.,et al.Institutional Change and the Transformation of the U.S.Radio Broadcasting Industry[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1991,36(6):333-363
[56]Suchman M.C.Managing Legitimacy-Strategic and Institutional Approaches[J].Academy of Management Review,1995,20(3):571-610
[57]Barley S.R.,Tolbert P.S.Institutionalization and Structuration:Studying the Links between Action and Institution[J].Organization Studies,1997,18(1):93-117
[58]Reay T.,Hinings C.R.The Recomposition of an Organizational Field:Health Care in Alberta[J].Organization Studies,2005,26(3):349-382
[59]Lounsbury M.,Crumley E.T.New Practice Creation:An Institutional Approach to Innovation[J].Organization Studies,2007,28(7):993-1012
[60]Boxenbaum E.,Jonsson S.Isomorphism,Diffusion and Decoupling[A]//Greenwood R.,Oliver C.,Sahlin K,et al(Eds.).The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism.London[C].London:Sage,2008
[61]Vasudeva G.,Spencer J.W.,Teegen H.J.Bringing the Institutional Context Back in:A Cross-National Comparison of Alliance Partner Selection and Knowledge Acquisition[J].Organization Science,2013,24(2):319-338
[62]Chung C.N.,Luo X.Institutional Logics or Agency Costs:The Influence of Corporate Governance Models on Business Group Restructuring in Emerging Economies[J].Organization Science,2008,19(5):766-784
[63]Ebrahim A.,Battilana J.,Mair J.The Governance of Social Enterprises:Mission Drift and Accountability Challenges in Hybrid Organizations[J].Research in Organizational Behavior,2014,(34):81-100
[64]Hyndman N.,Liguori M.,Meyer R.E.,et al.The Translation and Sedimentation of Accounting Reforms.A Comparison of the UK,Austrian and Italian Experiences[J].Critical Perspectives on Accounting,2014,25(4-5):388-408
[65]Jooste S.F.,Scott W.R.The Public-Private Partnership Enabling Field:Evidence from Three Cases[J].Administration&Society,2012,44(2):149-182
(1)Web of Science主题词检索是指在标题、关键词和摘要中进行逻辑“或”检索。通过主题词检索,可以保证文献样本具有较高的关联性和丰富性,以满足本文对“制度逻辑”领域文献进行研究的目的。
(2)手工处理主要是指对数据进行标准化处理,包括同义词及单复数规范和统一等,以保证运行结果的客观性和准确性。
(3)本文表4所呈现的国外制度逻辑领域高被引论文中Meyer和Rowan[22]以及DiM aggio和Powell[23]的文献分别位列第二和第一,由此印证了这两篇著作对制度逻辑研究领域的关键作用。
(4)表4所示的Friedland和Alford[2]文献在制度逻辑领域的被引频次位列第四位,说明该文献对制度逻辑领域的研究具有里程碑意义,为后续研究奠定了理论基础。
(5)期刊影响因子是评价期刊质量和学术影响力的最权威、最客观的标准。SSCI期刊的影响因子可通过查询如下网址获取:http://isikonwledge.com/JCR。表3报告的是2014年最新版JCR期刊影响因子数据。
(6)Ocasio所代表论文为第二作者,第一作者为杜克大学的Thornton。
(7)共被引图谱中各节点之间连线越粗,代表共被引次数越多;带深色光圈的节点具有较高中心性,与其他节点间联系较为紧密;作者名称为第一作者;本图根据下文因子分析结果进行了适当移动,以更直观反映文献关系。
(8)限于篇幅,本文并未将聚类树图呈现出来。
(9)根据设定阈值,共得到203个关键词,但共现关键词中存在同义词的单复数形式,经过合并处理,共得到188个共现关键词。
(10)图5中最大的节点为关键词“制度逻辑(institutional logics,220)”,但鉴于本文分析的研究主题即为制度逻辑,为了使呈现的图形美观,故此处予以忽略。
(11)若余弦指数大于0的关键词不足10个,只取余弦指数大于0的关键词;若大于0的关键词多余10个,则超过10个以上的聚类均拒绝加入该聚类。
[2]Feiedland R.,Alford R.R.Bringing Society Back in:Symbols,Practices,and Institutional Contradictions[A]//Powell W.W.and Di Maggio P.J.(Eds.).The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis[C].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1991
[3]Bhappu A.D.The Japanese Family:An Institutional Logic for Japanese Corporate Networks and Japanese Management[J].Academy of Management Review,2000,25(2):409-415
[4]Miller D.,Le Breton-Miller I.,Lester R.Family and Lone Founder Ownership and Strategic Behavior:Social Context,Identity,and Institutional Logics[J].Journal of Management Studies,2010,48(1):1-25
[5]Thornton P.H.,Ocasio W.Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations:Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry,1958-1990[J].American Journal of Sociology,1999,105(3):801-843
[6]Thornton P.H.The Rise of the Corporation in a Craft Industry:Conflict and Conformity in Institutional Logics[J].Academy of Management Journal,2002,45(1):81-101
[7]Greenwood R.,Diaz A.M.,Li S.X.,et al.The Multiplicity of Institutional Logics and the Heterogeneity of Organizational Responses[J].Organization Science,2010,21(2):521-539
[8]Greenwood R.,Raynard M.,Kodeih M.,et al.Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses[J].Academy of Management Annals,2011,5(1):317-371
[9]Blatter J.Beyond Hierarchies and Networks:Institutional Logics and Change in Transboundary Spaces[J].Governance,2003,16(4):503-526
[10]魏泽龙,谷盟.转型情景下企业合法性与绿色绩效的关系研究[J].管理评论,2015,27(4):76-84
[11]宋铁波,吴小节,汪秀琼.制度差异、企业跨区域经营经验与市场进入模式[J].管理评论,2016,28(4):166-177
[12]Tracey P.,Phillips N.,Jarvis O.Bridging Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Creation of New Organizational Forms:A Multilevel Model[J].Organization Science,2011,22(1):60-80
[13]Lepoutre J.M.W.N.,Valente M.Fools Breaking Out:The Role of Symbolic and Material Immunity in Explaining Institutional Nonconformity[J].Academy of Management Journal,2012,55(2):285-313
[14]Jones R.Organizational Culture Evolution:An Imprinting Perspective[J].Journal of Organizational Change Management,2014,27(6):973-994
[15]Gubbi S.R.,Aulakh P.S.,Ray S.International Search Behavior of Business Group Affiliated Firms:Scope of Institutional Changes and Intragroup Heterogeneity[J].Organization Science,2015,26(5):1485-1501
[16]武立东,王凯.独立董事制度从“规制”到“认知”的变迁——来自主板上市公司的证据[J].管理评论,2014,26(7):9-19
[17]刘则渊.科学知识图谱:方法与应用[M].北京:人民出版社,2007
[18]陶晓波,杨学成,许研.社会化商务研究述评与展望[J].管理评论,2015,27(11):75-85
[19]龚丽敏,魏江,董忆,等.商业模式研究现状和流派识别——基于1997-2010年SSCI引用情况的分析[J].管理评论,2013,25(6):131-140
[20]Callon M.,Courtial J.P.,Laville F.Co-word Analysis as a Tool for Describing the Network of Interactions between Basic and Technological Research:The Case of Polymer Chemistry[J].Scientometrics,1991,22(1):155-205
[21]Law J.,Bauin S.,Courtial J.P.,et al.Policy and the Mapping of Scientific Change:A Co-word Analysis of Research into Environmental Acidification[J].Scientometrics,1988,14(3):251-264
[22]Meyer J.W.,Rowan B.Institutionalized Organizations:Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony[J].American Journal of Sociology,1977,83(2):440-463
[23]Di Maggio P.J.,Powell W.W.The Iron Cage Revisited:Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in OrganizationalFields[J].American Sociological Review,1983,48(2):147-160
[24]Lounsbury M.A Tale of Two Cities:Competing Logics and Practice Variation in the Professionalizing of Mutual Funds[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(2):289-307
[25]Reay T.,Hinings C.R.Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics[J].Organization Studies,2009,30(6):629-652
[26]Scott W.R.,Ruef M.,Mendel P.J.,et al.Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations:From Professional Dominance to Managed Care[M].University of Chicago Press,2000
[27]Thornton P.H.,Ocasio W.,Lounsbury M.The Institutional Logics Perspective:A New Approach to Culture,Structure,and Process[M].London:Oxford University Press,2012
[28]Scott W.R.Institutions and Organizations[M].Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage,1995
[29]North D.C.Institutions,Institutional Change,and Economic Performance[M].London:Cambridge University Press,1990
[30]Hoffman A.J.Institutional Evolution and Change:Environmentalism and the US Chemical Industry[J].Academy of Management Journal,1999,42(4):351-371
[31]Oliver C.Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes[J].Academy of Management Review,1991,16(1):145-179
[32]Greenwood R.,Hinings C.R.Understanding Radical Organizational Change:Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism[J].Academy of Management Review,1996,21(4):1022-1054
[33]Pache A.,Santos F.When Worlds Collide:The Internal Dynamics of Organizational Responses to Conflicting Institutional Demands[J].Academy of Management Review,2010,35(3):455-476
[34]Binder A.For Love and Money:Organizations’Creative Responses to Multiple Environmental Logics[J].Theory and Society,2007,36(6):547-571
[35]Kraatz M.S.,Block E.S.Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism[A]//Greenwood R.,Oliver C.,Sahlin K.,Suddaby R.(Eds.),The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism[C].London:Sage,2008
[36]Dunn M.B.,Jones C.Institutional Logics and Institutional Pluralism:The Contestation of Care and Science Logics in Medical Education,1967-2005[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2010,55(1):114-149
[37]Battilana J.,Dorado S.Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations:The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations[J].Academy of Management Journal,2010,53(6):1419-1440
[38]Greenwood R.,Suddaby R.Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields:The Big Five Accounting Firms[J].Academy of Management Journal,2006,49(1):27-48
[39]Rao H.,Durand R.,Monin P.Institutional Change in Toque Ville:Nouvelle Cuisine as an Identity Movement in French Gastronomy[J].American Journal of Sociology,2003,108(4):795-843
[40]Meyer R.E.,Hammerschmid G.Changing Institutional Logics and Executive Identities:A Managerial Challenge to Public Administration in Austria[J].American Behavioral Scientist,2006,49(7):1000-1014
[41]Marquis C.,Lounsbury M.Vive La Résistence:Competing Logics and the Consolidation of U.S.Community Banking[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(4):799-820
[42]Thornton P.H.,Ocasio W.Institutional Logics.In Greenwood R.,Oliver C.,Sahlin K.,Suddaby R.(Eds.),The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism[C].London:Sage,2008
[43]Purdy J.M.,Gray B.Conflicting Logics,Mechanisms of Diffusion,and Multilevel Dynamics in Emerging Institutional Fields[J].Academy of Management Journal,2009,52(2):355-380
[44]Oliver C.The Antecedents of Deinstitutionalization[J].Organization Studies,1992,13(4):563-588
[45]Fligstein N.Social Skill and Institutional Theory[J].American Behavioral Scientist,1997,40(4):397-405
[46]Seo M.G.,Creed W.E.D.Institutional Contradictions,Praxis,and Institutional Change:A Dialectical Perspective[J].Academy of Management Review,2002,27(7):222-247
[47]Greenwood R.,Suddaby R.,Hinings C.R.Theorizing Change:The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutional Fields[J].Academy of Management Journal,2002,45(1):58-80
[48]Zilber T.B.Institutionalization as an Interplay between Actions,Meanings and Actors:The Case of a Rape Crisis Center in Israel[J].Academy of Management Journal,2002,45(1):234-254
[49]Maguire S.,Hardy C.,Lawrence T.B.Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields:HIV/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada[J].Academy of Management Journal,2004,47(5):657-679
[50]Glynn M.A.,Lounsbury M.From the Critics’Corner:Logic Blending,Discursive Change and Authenticity in a Cultural Production System[J].Journal of Management Studies,2005,42(5):1031-1055
[51]Zucker L.G.The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence[J].American Sociological Review,1977,42(5):726-743
[52]Tolbert P.S.,Zucker L.G.Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations:The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform,1880-1935[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1983,28(1):22-39
[53]Di Maggio P.J.Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory[M].Institutional Patterns and Organizations:Culture and Environment,1988
[54]Powell W.W.Expanding the Scope of Institutional Analysis[A]//Powell W.W.and Di Maggio P.J.(Eds.).The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis[C].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1991
[55]Leblebici H.,Salancik G.,Copay A.,et al.Institutional Change and the Transformation of the U.S.Radio Broadcasting Industry[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1991,36(6):333-363
[56]Suchman M.C.Managing Legitimacy-Strategic and Institutional Approaches[J].Academy of Management Review,1995,20(3):571-610
[57]Barley S.R.,Tolbert P.S.Institutionalization and Structuration:Studying the Links between Action and Institution[J].Organization Studies,1997,18(1):93-117
[58]Reay T.,Hinings C.R.The Recomposition of an Organizational Field:Health Care in Alberta[J].Organization Studies,2005,26(3):349-382
[59]Lounsbury M.,Crumley E.T.New Practice Creation:An Institutional Approach to Innovation[J].Organization Studies,2007,28(7):993-1012
[60]Boxenbaum E.,Jonsson S.Isomorphism,Diffusion and Decoupling[A]//Greenwood R.,Oliver C.,Sahlin K,et al(Eds.).The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism.London[C].London:Sage,2008
[61]Vasudeva G.,Spencer J.W.,Teegen H.J.Bringing the Institutional Context Back in:A Cross-National Comparison of Alliance Partner Selection and Knowledge Acquisition[J].Organization Science,2013,24(2):319-338
[62]Chung C.N.,Luo X.Institutional Logics or Agency Costs:The Influence of Corporate Governance Models on Business Group Restructuring in Emerging Economies[J].Organization Science,2008,19(5):766-784
[63]Ebrahim A.,Battilana J.,Mair J.The Governance of Social Enterprises:Mission Drift and Accountability Challenges in Hybrid Organizations[J].Research in Organizational Behavior,2014,(34):81-100
[64]Hyndman N.,Liguori M.,Meyer R.E.,et al.The Translation and Sedimentation of Accounting Reforms.A Comparison of the UK,Austrian and Italian Experiences[J].Critical Perspectives on Accounting,2014,25(4-5):388-408
[65]Jooste S.F.,Scott W.R.The Public-Private Partnership Enabling Field:Evidence from Three Cases[J].Administration&Society,2012,44(2):149-182
(1)Web of Science主题词检索是指在标题、关键词和摘要中进行逻辑“或”检索。通过主题词检索,可以保证文献样本具有较高的关联性和丰富性,以满足本文对“制度逻辑”领域文献进行研究的目的。
(2)手工处理主要是指对数据进行标准化处理,包括同义词及单复数规范和统一等,以保证运行结果的客观性和准确性。
(3)本文表4所呈现的国外制度逻辑领域高被引论文中Meyer和Rowan[22]以及DiM aggio和Powell[23]的文献分别位列第二和第一,由此印证了这两篇著作对制度逻辑研究领域的关键作用。
(4)表4所示的Friedland和Alford[2]文献在制度逻辑领域的被引频次位列第四位,说明该文献对制度逻辑领域的研究具有里程碑意义,为后续研究奠定了理论基础。
(5)期刊影响因子是评价期刊质量和学术影响力的最权威、最客观的标准。SSCI期刊的影响因子可通过查询如下网址获取:http://isikonwledge.com/JCR。表3报告的是2014年最新版JCR期刊影响因子数据。
(6)Ocasio所代表论文为第二作者,第一作者为杜克大学的Thornton。
(7)共被引图谱中各节点之间连线越粗,代表共被引次数越多;带深色光圈的节点具有较高中心性,与其他节点间联系较为紧密;作者名称为第一作者;本图根据下文因子分析结果进行了适当移动,以更直观反映文献关系。
(8)限于篇幅,本文并未将聚类树图呈现出来。
(9)根据设定阈值,共得到203个关键词,但共现关键词中存在同义词的单复数形式,经过合并处理,共得到188个共现关键词。
(10)图5中最大的节点为关键词“制度逻辑(institutional logics,220)”,但鉴于本文分析的研究主题即为制度逻辑,为了使呈现的图形美观,故此处予以忽略。
(11)若余弦指数大于0的关键词不足10个,只取余弦指数大于0的关键词;若大于0的关键词多余10个,则超过10个以上的聚类均拒绝加入该聚类。