聚合瓷表面不同处理方式对其与金属托槽粘接效果的影响
|
摘要
目的探讨4种不同表面处理方式对聚合瓷与金属托槽粘接效果的影响。方法制作45个聚合瓷试件块,从中挑选40个并根据表面处理方式的不同随机分为5组。A组:不做任何处理;B组:采用质量分数为9.6%的氢氟酸凝胶酸蚀;C组:质量分数为9.6%的氢氟酸凝胶酸蚀后联合涂布硅烷偶联剂;D组:质量分数为35%的磷酸凝胶酸蚀;E组:质量分数为35%的磷酸凝胶酸蚀后联合涂布硅烷偶联剂,各组处理后与金属托槽粘接。试件置入37℃恒温水浴箱内24 h,随后进行冷热水温度循环500次(5~55℃),完成后取出试件测量抗剪切强度,并统计剪切后试件块表面材料破损情况及粘接剂残留指数(adhesive remnant index,ARI)。结果各组抗剪切强度值分别为:对照组为3.24 MPa、氢氟酸酸蚀处理组为7.24 MPa、氢氟酸联合涂布硅烷偶联剂组为10.78 MPa、磷酸酸蚀组为4.17 MPa、磷酸联合涂布硅烷偶联剂处理组为6.84 MPa,各组间抗剪切强度比较均有统计学差异(P<0.001)。氢氟酸联合涂布硅烷偶联剂组在去粘接后聚合瓷折裂率较其它四组高。结论质量分数为35%的磷酸联合使用硅烷偶联剂处理聚合瓷表面,既达到临床所需有效粘接强度,又在去粘接后减少聚合瓷破损率,故临床推荐使用。
Objective To analyze and discuss the effect of 4 different surface treatment methods on the bonding effect between polymerization porcelain and metal brackets. Methods 45 polymer-ceramics specimens were made and40 of them were selected and randomly divided into 5 groups according to different surface treatment methods. A group:surface without special treatment. B group: 9.6% hydrofluoric acid gel combine with bonding agent, C group: 9.6% hydrofluoric acid gel combine with silane, D group: 35% phosphoric acid gel combine with bonding agent, E group: 35%phosphoric acid gel combine with silane. All specimens were stored in water for 24 hours at 37 ℃ after bonding 10 min utes and then cycled 500 cycles(5 ℃ to 55 ℃). To measure the shear bonding strength and record the damage cases and the adhesive remnant index. Results The shear strength values were: 3.24 in the control group, 7.24 MPa in the hydrofluoric acid etching treatment group. 10.78 MPa in the hydrofluoric acid gel combined with silane group. 4.17 MPa in the phosphoric acid-only group, 6.84 MPa in the phosphoric acid gel combined with silane group. The results of each group were statistically different from those of the other four groups(P < 0.001). The rate of breakage after the removal of brackets of the hydrofluoric acid gel combined with silane group is higher than the others. Conclusion As to the high shear bonding strength and low rate of breakage after the removal of brackets, we recommend 35% phosphoric acid etching combining with silane coupling agent in clinical.
Objective To analyze and discuss the effect of 4 different surface treatment methods on the bonding effect between polymerization porcelain and metal brackets. Methods 45 polymer-ceramics specimens were made and40 of them were selected and randomly divided into 5 groups according to different surface treatment methods. A group:surface without special treatment. B group: 9.6% hydrofluoric acid gel combine with bonding agent, C group: 9.6% hydrofluoric acid gel combine with silane, D group: 35% phosphoric acid gel combine with bonding agent, E group: 35%phosphoric acid gel combine with silane. All specimens were stored in water for 24 hours at 37 ℃ after bonding 10 min utes and then cycled 500 cycles(5 ℃ to 55 ℃). To measure the shear bonding strength and record the damage cases and the adhesive remnant index. Results The shear strength values were: 3.24 in the control group, 7.24 MPa in the hydrofluoric acid etching treatment group. 10.78 MPa in the hydrofluoric acid gel combined with silane group. 4.17 MPa in the phosphoric acid-only group, 6.84 MPa in the phosphoric acid gel combined with silane group. The results of each group were statistically different from those of the other four groups(P < 0.001). The rate of breakage after the removal of brackets of the hydrofluoric acid gel combined with silane group is higher than the others. Conclusion As to the high shear bonding strength and low rate of breakage after the removal of brackets, we recommend 35% phosphoric acid etching combining with silane coupling agent in clinical.
引文
[1]Villarroel M,Fahl N,De Sousa AM,et al.Direct esthetic restorations based on translucency and opacity of composite resins[J].J Esthet Restor Dent,2011,23(2):73-87.
[2]Newman SM,Dressler KB,Grenadier MR.Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets to esthetic restorative materials using a silane[J].Am J Orthod,1984,86(6):503-506.
[3]Heintze SD,Zimmerli B.Relevance of in vitro tests of adhesive and composite dental materials.A review in 3 parts.Part 3:in vitro tests of adhesive systems[J].Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed,2011,121(11):1024-1040.
[4]米宇菁,冯云霞,鲍萍萍,等.不同表面处理方式对金属托槽与瓷面黏结效果的影响[J].山西医药杂志,2013,42(13):750-751.
[5]滕吉利,骆琳,梁星,等.Ceramage聚合瓷冠边缘适合性和抗折强度的研究[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2010,37(3):277-279.
[6]Hallmann L,Ulmer P,Reusser E,et al.Surface characterzation of dental Y-TZP ceramic after air abrasion treatment[J].J Dent,2012,40(9):723-735.
[7]范存晖,陈杰,刘君,等.金属托槽与光固化复合树脂修复面粘接抗剪切强度的实验研究[J].山东医药,2005,45(21):51-52.
[8]Pannes DD,Bailey DK,Thompson JY,et al.Orthodontic bonding to porcelain:a comparison of bonding systems[J].J Prosthet Dent,2003,89(1):66-69.
[9]Wolf DM,Powers JM,Okeefe KL.Bond strength of composite to etched and sandblasted porcelain[J].Am J Dent,1993,6(3):155-158.
[10]Sriamporn T,Thamrongananskul N,Busabok CA,et al.Dental zirconia can be etched by hydrofluoric acid[J].Dent Mater J,2014,33(1):79-85.
[11]Tian T,Tsoi JK,Matinlinna JP,et al.Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials[J].Dent Mater,2014,30(7):e147-e162.
[12]姜海巍,石旭旭,白莉学,等.不同表面处理方法对陶瓷托槽与不同瓷修复体粘结强度影响的研究[J].口腔医学研究,2016,32(5):453-455.
[13]朱嘉,廖岚.混合陶瓷表面不同处理方法对树脂水门汀粘接强度影响研究[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2017,10(5):287-290.
[14]Falkensammer F,Freudenthaler J,Pseiner B,et al.Influence of surface conditioning on ceramic microstructure and bracket adhesion[J].Eur J Orthod,2012,34(4):498-504.
[15]Zachrisson BU.Orthodontic bonding to artificial tooth surfaces:clinical versus laboratory findings[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2000,117(5):592-594.
[2]Newman SM,Dressler KB,Grenadier MR.Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets to esthetic restorative materials using a silane[J].Am J Orthod,1984,86(6):503-506.
[3]Heintze SD,Zimmerli B.Relevance of in vitro tests of adhesive and composite dental materials.A review in 3 parts.Part 3:in vitro tests of adhesive systems[J].Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed,2011,121(11):1024-1040.
[4]米宇菁,冯云霞,鲍萍萍,等.不同表面处理方式对金属托槽与瓷面黏结效果的影响[J].山西医药杂志,2013,42(13):750-751.
[5]滕吉利,骆琳,梁星,等.Ceramage聚合瓷冠边缘适合性和抗折强度的研究[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2010,37(3):277-279.
[6]Hallmann L,Ulmer P,Reusser E,et al.Surface characterzation of dental Y-TZP ceramic after air abrasion treatment[J].J Dent,2012,40(9):723-735.
[7]范存晖,陈杰,刘君,等.金属托槽与光固化复合树脂修复面粘接抗剪切强度的实验研究[J].山东医药,2005,45(21):51-52.
[8]Pannes DD,Bailey DK,Thompson JY,et al.Orthodontic bonding to porcelain:a comparison of bonding systems[J].J Prosthet Dent,2003,89(1):66-69.
[9]Wolf DM,Powers JM,Okeefe KL.Bond strength of composite to etched and sandblasted porcelain[J].Am J Dent,1993,6(3):155-158.
[10]Sriamporn T,Thamrongananskul N,Busabok CA,et al.Dental zirconia can be etched by hydrofluoric acid[J].Dent Mater J,2014,33(1):79-85.
[11]Tian T,Tsoi JK,Matinlinna JP,et al.Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials[J].Dent Mater,2014,30(7):e147-e162.
[12]姜海巍,石旭旭,白莉学,等.不同表面处理方法对陶瓷托槽与不同瓷修复体粘结强度影响的研究[J].口腔医学研究,2016,32(5):453-455.
[13]朱嘉,廖岚.混合陶瓷表面不同处理方法对树脂水门汀粘接强度影响研究[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2017,10(5):287-290.
[14]Falkensammer F,Freudenthaler J,Pseiner B,et al.Influence of surface conditioning on ceramic microstructure and bracket adhesion[J].Eur J Orthod,2012,34(4):498-504.
[15]Zachrisson BU.Orthodontic bonding to artificial tooth surfaces:clinical versus laboratory findings[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2000,117(5):592-594.