止嗽散治疗慢性咳嗽的临床观察
|
摘要
目的探究止嗽散治疗慢性咳嗽的临床效果,期许为临床上提供有价值的参考。方法选择2017年2月—2018年2月我院100例慢性咳嗽患者,将上述患者按随机数表法分为2组,对照组接受常规西医治疗,观察组加用止嗽散治疗,比较两组治疗效果。结果观察组中显效23例,有效25例,无效2例,治疗总有效率为96.0%,高于对照组78.0%,组间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组中3例患者出现不良反应,发生率为6.0%,对照组中2例患者出现不良反应,发生率为4.0%,组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论止嗽散治疗慢性咳嗽的临床效果非常显著。
Objective To explore the clinical effect of Zhisou San in the treatment of chronic cough.Methods 100 cases of chronic cough in our hospital from February 2017 to February 2018 were selected and divided into two groups according to the random number table method.The control group was treated with conventional western medicine,and the observation group was treated with Zhisou San,and the curative effect of the two groups was compared.Results In the observation group,23 cases were effective,25 cases were effective,2 cases were invalid,the effective rate of treatment was 96.0%,significantly higher than that of the control group of 78.0%.The difference between the groups was statistically significant(P < 0.05).In the observation group,3 patients had adverse reactions,the rate of occurrence was 6%.In the control group,and 2 patients had adverse reactions,the rate of occurrence was 4%,there was no significant difference between the groups(P > 0.05).Conclusion The clinical effect of Zhisou San in treating chronic cough is remarkable.
Objective To explore the clinical effect of Zhisou San in the treatment of chronic cough.Methods 100 cases of chronic cough in our hospital from February 2017 to February 2018 were selected and divided into two groups according to the random number table method.The control group was treated with conventional western medicine,and the observation group was treated with Zhisou San,and the curative effect of the two groups was compared.Results In the observation group,23 cases were effective,25 cases were effective,2 cases were invalid,the effective rate of treatment was 96.0%,significantly higher than that of the control group of 78.0%.The difference between the groups was statistically significant(P < 0.05).In the observation group,3 patients had adverse reactions,the rate of occurrence was 6%.In the control group,and 2 patients had adverse reactions,the rate of occurrence was 4%,there was no significant difference between the groups(P > 0.05).Conclusion The clinical effect of Zhisou San in treating chronic cough is remarkable.
引文
[1]中华医学会呼吸病分会哮喘学组.咳嗽的诊断与治疗指南[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2016,39(5):323-354.
[2]李文.吴银根从“瘀”论治慢性咳嗽经验[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2013,19(1):58-59.
[3]金延强,张伟.从五脏论慢性咳嗽病机[J].中医药学报,2015,43(1):120-121.
[4]赖克方,李斌恺,王法霞,等.慢性咳嗽患者的诊疗现状调查[J].中华哮喘杂志(电子版),2011,5(1):8-10.
[5]吴学敏.止嗽散加减合苓甘五味姜辛汤治疗88例慢性咳嗽的疗效分析[J].中医临床研究,2015,7(1):81-82.
[6]余成勇.苓甘五味姜辛汤合止嗽散加减治疗慢性咳嗽临床观察[J].新中医,2017,12(7):44-46.
[7]黄国平.小儿咳嗽变异型哮喘的早期诊断及治疗[J].中国医药指南,2014,12(24):144-145.
[8]李永兰,刘志勤.吸入性糖皮质激素对咳嗽变异性哮喘气道炎症和高反应性的影响[J].海南医学,2014,25(13):1913-1915.
[9]钟建军.苓甘五味姜辛汤合止嗽散加减治疗老年慢性咳嗽的疗效观察[J].医学信息,2016,29(31):142-143.
[10]李育祥.苓甘五味姜辛汤合止嗽散加减治疗慢性咳嗽的思路探讨[J].中国社区医师,2014,30(5):86-87.
[11]乔明飞.苓甘五味姜辛汤合止嗽散加减治疗慢性咳嗽临床分析[J].光明中医,2016,31(11):1529-1530.
[12]刘丹.升阳益胃汤治疗慢性咳嗽的病案分析[J].中国继续医学教育,2016,8(34):177-178.
[13]李全香,张红旗,李汾香.止嗽散合苓甘五味姜辛汤治疗寒性咳嗽56例临床观察[J].中国民间疗法,2014,22(1):42-43.
[2]李文.吴银根从“瘀”论治慢性咳嗽经验[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2013,19(1):58-59.
[3]金延强,张伟.从五脏论慢性咳嗽病机[J].中医药学报,2015,43(1):120-121.
[4]赖克方,李斌恺,王法霞,等.慢性咳嗽患者的诊疗现状调查[J].中华哮喘杂志(电子版),2011,5(1):8-10.
[5]吴学敏.止嗽散加减合苓甘五味姜辛汤治疗88例慢性咳嗽的疗效分析[J].中医临床研究,2015,7(1):81-82.
[6]余成勇.苓甘五味姜辛汤合止嗽散加减治疗慢性咳嗽临床观察[J].新中医,2017,12(7):44-46.
[7]黄国平.小儿咳嗽变异型哮喘的早期诊断及治疗[J].中国医药指南,2014,12(24):144-145.
[8]李永兰,刘志勤.吸入性糖皮质激素对咳嗽变异性哮喘气道炎症和高反应性的影响[J].海南医学,2014,25(13):1913-1915.
[9]钟建军.苓甘五味姜辛汤合止嗽散加减治疗老年慢性咳嗽的疗效观察[J].医学信息,2016,29(31):142-143.
[10]李育祥.苓甘五味姜辛汤合止嗽散加减治疗慢性咳嗽的思路探讨[J].中国社区医师,2014,30(5):86-87.
[11]乔明飞.苓甘五味姜辛汤合止嗽散加减治疗慢性咳嗽临床分析[J].光明中医,2016,31(11):1529-1530.
[12]刘丹.升阳益胃汤治疗慢性咳嗽的病案分析[J].中国继续医学教育,2016,8(34):177-178.
[13]李全香,张红旗,李汾香.止嗽散合苓甘五味姜辛汤治疗寒性咳嗽56例临床观察[J].中国民间疗法,2014,22(1):42-43.