基于模糊重要度指标排序的突变决策应用
|
摘要
为解决指标决策法赋权失真及突变决策重要性排序的主观偏差,应用组合思想,基于模糊AHP评判对比矩阵解算重要度排序向量,进而构建科学重要度的突变评价系统来实现更优评判。以夏甸金矿特型灾害矿体的回采方案选择为例,设立13个评价指标来实现系统全面评判,设置9个次级指标来提高解算精度,计算出上向水平分层充填法、分段空场法、环境再造诱导崩落法3个预选方案的评价值依次为0.988,0.992及0.956,最终确定分段空场法为最佳方案。
In order to solve the problems of weighting error in the multiple-criteria decision-making and subjective bias in importance ranking during the decision-making with catastrophe theory, a combined concept was used to resolve the matrix based on fuzzy AHP method and the vector for importance ranking was obtained. Then a scientific importance evaluation system based on catastrophe theory was constructed. The evaluation system was applied in the selecting the proper stoping method for Xiadian Gold Mine with geological conditions being extremely unfavorable for ore exploitation. 13 criteria were set for performing a comprehensive evaluation and 9 sub-indexes were decided for improving the resolving precision. After calculation, the evaluation value for the preliminarily selected three mining methods, including upward horizontal slice stoping and filling method, sublevel open stoping and induced caving mining based on mining environment regeneration, were 0.988, 0.992, 0.956 respectively, indicating that the sublevel open stoping mining method is the optimum mining method for the gold mine.
In order to solve the problems of weighting error in the multiple-criteria decision-making and subjective bias in importance ranking during the decision-making with catastrophe theory, a combined concept was used to resolve the matrix based on fuzzy AHP method and the vector for importance ranking was obtained. Then a scientific importance evaluation system based on catastrophe theory was constructed. The evaluation system was applied in the selecting the proper stoping method for Xiadian Gold Mine with geological conditions being extremely unfavorable for ore exploitation. 13 criteria were set for performing a comprehensive evaluation and 9 sub-indexes were decided for improving the resolving precision. After calculation, the evaluation value for the preliminarily selected three mining methods, including upward horizontal slice stoping and filling method, sublevel open stoping and induced caving mining based on mining environment regeneration, were 0.988, 0.992, 0.956 respectively, indicating that the sublevel open stoping mining method is the optimum mining method for the gold mine.
引文
[1] 谭玉叶,宋卫东,李铁一,等.采矿方法优选多目标决策一致性组合权重研究及应用[J].北京科技大学学报,2014,36(8):1115-1122.
[2] 阳雨平,邓星星,冯岩.基于未确知测度与层次分析法的采矿方法优选[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2014,45(11):3936-3942.
[3] 王新民,秦健春,张钦礼,等.基于AHP-TOPSIS评判模型的姑山驻留矿采矿方法优选[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,44(3):1131-1137.
[4] Yari M,Monjezi M,Bagherpour R,et al.Developing a mathematical assessment model for blasting patterns management:Sungun copper mine[J].Journal of Central South University,2014,21(11):4344-4351.
[5] 张军,王建鹏,杨文光.综采工作面冒落高度模糊综合预测模型研究[J].中国矿业大学学报,2014,43(3):426-431.
[6] 王少勇,吴爱祥,韩斌,等.自然崩落法矿岩可崩性模糊物元评价方法[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(6):1241-1247.
[7] 张钦礼,陈宇,王新民,等.改进突变理论在井下排水方案优选中的应用[J].安全与环境学报,2015,15(3):48-52.
[8] Juanjuan Zhai,Xiaomei Wang.The evaluation of coal mine safety management based on catastrophe theory[C]//2011 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence,Management Science and Electronic Commerce,2011:7358-7361.
[9] 白云飞,叶振华.基于突变优选理论的采矿方法选择[J].金属矿山,2011,424(10):61-67.
[10] 王新民,赵彬,张钦礼.基于层次分析和模糊数学的采矿方法选择[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2008,39(5):875-880.
[11] 洪志国,李焱,范植华,等.层次分析法中高阶平均随机一致性指标(RI)的计算[J].计算机工程与应用,2002,38(12):45-47.
[12] 焦树锋.AHP法中平均随机一致性指标的算法及MATLAB实现[J].太原师范学院学报(自然科学版),2008,5(4):875-880.
[13] 凌复华.突变理论及其应用[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,1987.
[14] 方崇.基于燕尾突变理论光面爆破效果的综合评价[J].爆破,2010,27(4):40-47.
[2] 阳雨平,邓星星,冯岩.基于未确知测度与层次分析法的采矿方法优选[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2014,45(11):3936-3942.
[3] 王新民,秦健春,张钦礼,等.基于AHP-TOPSIS评判模型的姑山驻留矿采矿方法优选[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,44(3):1131-1137.
[4] Yari M,Monjezi M,Bagherpour R,et al.Developing a mathematical assessment model for blasting patterns management:Sungun copper mine[J].Journal of Central South University,2014,21(11):4344-4351.
[5] 张军,王建鹏,杨文光.综采工作面冒落高度模糊综合预测模型研究[J].中国矿业大学学报,2014,43(3):426-431.
[6] 王少勇,吴爱祥,韩斌,等.自然崩落法矿岩可崩性模糊物元评价方法[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(6):1241-1247.
[7] 张钦礼,陈宇,王新民,等.改进突变理论在井下排水方案优选中的应用[J].安全与环境学报,2015,15(3):48-52.
[8] Juanjuan Zhai,Xiaomei Wang.The evaluation of coal mine safety management based on catastrophe theory[C]//2011 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence,Management Science and Electronic Commerce,2011:7358-7361.
[9] 白云飞,叶振华.基于突变优选理论的采矿方法选择[J].金属矿山,2011,424(10):61-67.
[10] 王新民,赵彬,张钦礼.基于层次分析和模糊数学的采矿方法选择[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2008,39(5):875-880.
[11] 洪志国,李焱,范植华,等.层次分析法中高阶平均随机一致性指标(RI)的计算[J].计算机工程与应用,2002,38(12):45-47.
[12] 焦树锋.AHP法中平均随机一致性指标的算法及MATLAB实现[J].太原师范学院学报(自然科学版),2008,5(4):875-880.
[13] 凌复华.突变理论及其应用[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,1987.
[14] 方崇.基于燕尾突变理论光面爆破效果的综合评价[J].爆破,2010,27(4):40-47.