基于技术转移转化的专利价值评估与增值管理
|
摘要
基于"专利价值分析指标体系"的优化模型开展专利价值评分,利用帕累托法则进行价值度的划分,为专利分级分类管理提供依据。在此基础上,从技术转移转化过程增值管理角度提出两点建议:(1)以评价的高价值专利为中心实施专利组合管理;(2)围绕潜在高价值专利实施优先关键专利布局策略。实证分析表明优化模型对于专利价值评估具有良好的可靠性,依据评价结果实施专利组合管理与优先布局策略有利于促进技术专利转化过程中的价值增值。
Based on the optimization model of "patent value analysis index system", patent value scoring is carried out, and the Pareto rule is used to divide the value degree, which provides the basis for management of patent classification. On this basis, this paper puts forward two suggestions from the point of view of value-added management in the process of technology transfer and transformation:(1) Carry out patent portfolio management based on the evaluation of high value patents.(2) Carry out priority key patent layout strategy around potential high value patent. The empirical analysis shows that, the optimized model has good reliability for the evaluation of patent value. According to the evaluation results, the implementation of patent portfolio management and priority layout strategy are conducive to promoting the value added in the process of technology patent transformation.
Based on the optimization model of "patent value analysis index system", patent value scoring is carried out, and the Pareto rule is used to divide the value degree, which provides the basis for management of patent classification. On this basis, this paper puts forward two suggestions from the point of view of value-added management in the process of technology transfer and transformation:(1) Carry out patent portfolio management based on the evaluation of high value patents.(2) Carry out priority key patent layout strategy around potential high value patent. The empirical analysis shows that, the optimized model has good reliability for the evaluation of patent value. According to the evaluation results, the implementation of patent portfolio management and priority layout strategy are conducive to promoting the value added in the process of technology patent transformation.
引文
[1]叶静怡,杨洋,韩佳伟,等.中美高校技术转移效率比较:基于专利的视角[J].中国科技论坛, 2015, 31(1):150-155.
[2]SWAMIDASS P M, VULASA V. Why university inventions rarely produce income? Bottlenecks in university technology transfer[J].Journal of Technology Transfer, 2009,34(4):343-363.
[3]WARNER E. Patenting and innovation in China: incentives, policy and outcomes[EB/OL].(2015-01-01) [2017-09-10] .https://www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSD347.html.
[4]刘倩.我国专利资产价值评估研究[D].保定:华北电力大学, 2014.
[5]崔婕.成本法在专利技术价值评估中的应用[J].中国证券期货, 2011,19(6):173-173.
[6]苏健美.基于收益法的专利权价值评估研究[D].昆明:云南大学, 2014.
[7]中华人民共和国国家知识产权局专利管理司,中国技术交易所.专利价值分析指标体系操作手册[M].北京:知识产权出版社, 2012.
[8]吴全伟,伏晓艳,李娇,等.专利价值评估体系的探析及展望[J].中国发明与专利, 2016,13(3): 123-127.
[9]杨思思,戴磊.专利价值评估方法研究概述[J].电子知识产权, 2016,15(9): 78-84.
[10]辛益军.方差分析与实验设计[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社, 2002:150.
[11]YU X, MEUWISSEN T H. Using the Pareto principle in genomewide breeding value estimation[J]. Genetics Selection Evolution, 2011,43(1):1-7.
[12]JOHANNES S. Patents as a source of business information[EB/OL].(2008-02-29) [2017-11-17]. http://patenty.bg.agh. edu.pl/graf/095822Jochannes% 20Schaaf1.pdf.
[13]GAMBARDELLA A. The value of European patents[J].European Management Review,2008,5(2): 69-84.
[14]吴昊.定了!天然气水合物成为第173个矿种[EB/OL].(2017-11-17) [2017-11-17]. http://www.cgs.gov.cn/xwl/ddyw/201711/t20171117_444122.html.
[15]BROCKHOFF K K. Indicators of firm patent activities[J].Technology and Management: The New International Language, 1991,10: 476-481.
[16]曹勇,蒋振宇,孙合林.专利组合策略及其对技术创新绩效的影响研究[J].情报杂志,2015,34(11): 55-61.
[17]乔永忠,肖冰.基于权利要求数的专利维持时间影响因素研究[J].科学学研究, 2016,34(5):678-683.
[18]ARNAUD A, BETEILLE F, GIRON J C, et al. Glazing coated with at least one layer having thermochromic properties: US 6872453 B2[P/OL].(2000-05-23)[2018-03-09]. https://patents.google.com/patent/ US6872453B2/en.
[2]SWAMIDASS P M, VULASA V. Why university inventions rarely produce income? Bottlenecks in university technology transfer[J].Journal of Technology Transfer, 2009,34(4):343-363.
[3]WARNER E. Patenting and innovation in China: incentives, policy and outcomes[EB/OL].(2015-01-01) [2017-09-10] .https://www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSD347.html.
[4]刘倩.我国专利资产价值评估研究[D].保定:华北电力大学, 2014.
[5]崔婕.成本法在专利技术价值评估中的应用[J].中国证券期货, 2011,19(6):173-173.
[6]苏健美.基于收益法的专利权价值评估研究[D].昆明:云南大学, 2014.
[7]中华人民共和国国家知识产权局专利管理司,中国技术交易所.专利价值分析指标体系操作手册[M].北京:知识产权出版社, 2012.
[8]吴全伟,伏晓艳,李娇,等.专利价值评估体系的探析及展望[J].中国发明与专利, 2016,13(3): 123-127.
[9]杨思思,戴磊.专利价值评估方法研究概述[J].电子知识产权, 2016,15(9): 78-84.
[10]辛益军.方差分析与实验设计[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社, 2002:150.
[11]YU X, MEUWISSEN T H. Using the Pareto principle in genomewide breeding value estimation[J]. Genetics Selection Evolution, 2011,43(1):1-7.
[12]JOHANNES S. Patents as a source of business information[EB/OL].(2008-02-29) [2017-11-17]. http://patenty.bg.agh. edu.pl/graf/095822Jochannes% 20Schaaf1.pdf.
[13]GAMBARDELLA A. The value of European patents[J].European Management Review,2008,5(2): 69-84.
[14]吴昊.定了!天然气水合物成为第173个矿种[EB/OL].(2017-11-17) [2017-11-17]. http://www.cgs.gov.cn/xwl/ddyw/201711/t20171117_444122.html.
[15]BROCKHOFF K K. Indicators of firm patent activities[J].Technology and Management: The New International Language, 1991,10: 476-481.
[16]曹勇,蒋振宇,孙合林.专利组合策略及其对技术创新绩效的影响研究[J].情报杂志,2015,34(11): 55-61.
[17]乔永忠,肖冰.基于权利要求数的专利维持时间影响因素研究[J].科学学研究, 2016,34(5):678-683.
[18]ARNAUD A, BETEILLE F, GIRON J C, et al. Glazing coated with at least one layer having thermochromic properties: US 6872453 B2[P/OL].(2000-05-23)[2018-03-09]. https://patents.google.com/patent/ US6872453B2/en.