长江经济带外商直接投资的环境效应研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Environmental effects of foreign direct investment in the Yangtze River Economic Belt
  • 作者:何艳 ; 暴洪泽 ; 徐伟鹏
  • 英文作者:HE Yan;School of Economic and Management,Hubei University of Technology;Hubei Circular Economic Development Research Center,Hubei University of Technology;
  • 关键词:长江经济带 ; 外商直接投资 ; 环境效应
  • 英文关键词:Yangtze Economic Belt;;Foreign direct investment;;Environmental effect
  • 中文刊名:GTZY
  • 英文刊名:Territory & Natural Resources Study
  • 机构:湖北工业大学经济与管理学院;湖北工业大学湖北循环经济发展研究中心;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-15
  • 出版单位:国土与自然资源研究
  • 年:2019
  • 期:No.179
  • 基金:湖北省教育厅哲社项目“长江经济带沿江省市物流网络与出口技术结构的协调发展”(16ZD022);湖北省教育厅人社项目“基于生态宜居的武汉市新城产城融合研究——以蔡甸新城为例”(Q20151403);; 教育部人文社科项目“产业协同集聚的地区出口效应:基于技术复杂度的研究”(16YJC790024)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:GTZY201902005
  • 页数:5
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:23-1216/N
  • 分类号:21-25
摘要
外资对环境的影响分为规模、结构和技术效应。虽然2003年至2016年期间外资与环境之间呈倒U型关系,但总体规模效应为正,结构效应为负,技术效应不确定。污染治理投入对环境改善产生了负效应,说明长江经济带正在弥补以前先污染后治理的过错,但还存在"越治理越污染"的怪象。外资专利申请对环境的正向作用有限,建议在继续扩大外资规模的同时,注重优化产业结构,提高技术引进层次。
        The effect of foreign capital on the environment is divided into scale, structure and technological effects. Although there was an inverted U relationship between foreign investment and the environment between 2003 and 2016, the current scale effect is positive, the structural effect is negative, and the technical effect is uncertain. Pollution control input has a negative effect on environmental improvement, which shows that the Yangtze River Economic Belt is making up for the previous pollution, and reveals a phenomenon of "more governance and more pollution". The positive effect of foreign patent applications on the environment is limited. Therefore, foreign investment should be optimized industrial structure and the technological level while the scale is expanding.
引文
[1]Kevin R.Gray.Foreign Direct Investment and Environmental Impacts-Is the Debate Over?[J].Reviewof European Community&International Environmental Law,2010,11(3):306-313.
    [2]Luisa Blanco,Fidel Gonzalez,Isabel Ruiz.The Impact of FDI on CO2Emissions in Latin America[J].Oxford Development Studies,2013,41(1):104-121.
    [3]Shenggang Ren,Baolong Yuan,Xie Ma,Xiaohong Chen.International trade,FDI(foreign direct investment)and embodied CO2emissions:A case study of Chinas industrial sectors[J].China Economic Review,2014,28(1):123-134.
    [4]Khuda Bakhsh,Sobia Rose,Muhammad Faisal Ali,Najid Ahmad,Muhammad Shahbaz.Economic growth,CO2emissions,renewable waste and FDI relation in Pakistan:New evidences from 3SLS[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2017,196(7):627-632.
    [5]Nancy Birdsall,David Wheeler.Trade Policy and Industrial Pollution in Latin America:Where Are the Pollution Havens?[J].The Journal of Environment&Development,1993,2(1):137-149.
    [6]Kevub Grey,Duncan Brank.Environmental Issues in Policy-based Competition for Investment:a Literature Review[Z].ENV/EPOC/GSP,2002.
    [7]Myeong Hwan Kim,Nodir Adilov.The lesser of two evils:an empirical investigation of foreign direct investment-pollution tradeoff[J].Applied Economics,2012,44(20):2597-2606.
    [8]陈明亮.谈外商投资对我国环境库兹涅茨曲线的影响[J].商业时代,2010,(32):55-56.
    [9]牛海霞,胡佳雨.FDI与我国二氧化碳排放相关性实证研究[J].国际贸易问题,2011,(05):100-109.
    [10]冷艳丽,冼国明,杜思正.外商直接投资与雾霾污染---基于中国省际面板数据的实证分析[J].国际贸易问题,2015,(12):74-84.
    [11]严雅雪,齐绍洲.外商直接投资对中国城市雾霾(PM2.5)污染的时空效应检验[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,(4):68-77.
    [12]裴辉儒,彭依文.外商投资企业对中国PM0.5污染的空间计量分析--基于1999-2016年31个省际的数据检验[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,(4):1-10.
    [13]何正霞,许士春.我国经济开放对环境影响的实证研究:1990-2007年[J].国际贸易问题,2009,(10):87-93.
    [14]GM Grossman,AB Krueger.Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing,1991,8(2):223-250.
    [15]尹元元.外商直接投资环境技术效应实证研究--基于自主创新和技术外溢视角[J].软科学,2018,(5):37-39+54.
    [16]曾慧.外商直接投资环境效应及区域差异研究---基于面板模型的实证分析[J].国际商务研究,2016,(2):87-96.
    [17]盛斌,吕越.外国直接投资对中国环境的影响---来自工业行业面板数据的实证研究[J].中国社会科学,2012,(5):54-75.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700