英语写作同伴反馈评语采纳及其影响因素研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Implementation of Peer Feedback and Its Potential Mediators in English Writing
  • 作者:高瑛 ; 汪溢 ; Christian ; D.Schunn
  • 英文作者:GAO Ying;WANG Yi;Christian D.SCHUNN;School of Foreign Languages,Northeast Normal University;Learning Research and Development Center,University of Pittsburgh;
  • 关键词:同伴反馈 ; 评语采纳 ; 文本修改 ; 潜在中介 ; 英语写作
  • 英文关键词:Peer Feedback;;Feedback Implementation;;Draft Revision;;Potential Mediator;;English Writing
  • 中文刊名:WYDH
  • 英文刊名:Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education
  • 机构:东北师范大学;美国匹兹堡大学;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-20
  • 出版单位:外语电化教学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:No.186
  • 基金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“中国语境下英语写作同伴互评模式优化及效果跟踪研究”(项目编号:18BYY114)的阶段性研究成果
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:WYDH201902003
  • 页数:8
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:31-1036/G4
  • 分类号:19-26
摘要
评语采纳是英语写作同伴互评中影响修改与互评效果的重要中间环节,有待深入研究。文章以基于Peerceptiv互评系统的30篇议论文写作一稿和二稿、682条评语及258条作者回评为语料,分析评语、采纳、潜在中介及修改之间的多维互动关系。研究发现,采纳对修改质量提高具有一定的预测性,语言焦点评语和"给出解决办法"及"定位问题"评语形式对采纳预测性强,采纳受情感中介"同意"影响。同伴反馈应以易于令人接受的建设性方式兼顾语言和内容双重问题。
        Feedback implementation is an important revision mediator in peer review in English writing. To explore effects of implementation on revision and impact of feedback comments and potential mediators on implementation, draft 1 & 2 of 30 argumentative writings, 682 feedback comments and 258 author back reviews from Peerceptiv were analyzed in detail. Overall, implementation can predict revision improvement rate; comments on linguistic issues, "offering solutions" and "localization" strongly predict implementation; and implementation is influenced by affective potential mediator "agreement". Peer feedback needs to focus on both linguistic issues and writing contents, and needs to be put forward in an easily acceptable and suggestive manner.
引文
[1]Berg,E.C.The effects of trained peer response on ESLstudents'revision types and writing quality[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,1999(3).
    [2]Bitchener,J.Written corrective feedback for L2 development:Current knowledge and future research[J].TESOL Quarterly,2012(4).
    [3]Cho,K.&C.MacArthur.Learning by reviewing[J].Journal of Educational Psychology,2011(1).
    [4]Ene,E.&T.A.Upton.Learner uptake of teacher electronic feedback in ESL composition[J].System,2014(1).
    [5]Faigley,L.&S.Witte.Analyzing revision[J].College Composition and Communication,1981(4).
    [6]Gao,Y.,Schunn,C.D.&Q.Yu.The alignment of written peer feedback with draft problems and its impact on revision in peer assessment[J].Assessment&Evaluation in Higher Education,2019(2).
    [7]Hansen,J.G.&J.Liu.Guiding principles for effective peer response[J].ELT Journal,2005(1).
    [8]Hayes,J.R.et al.Cognitive processes in revision[A].In Rosenberg,S.(ed.).Advances in Applied Psycholinguistics(Vol.2,pp.176-240)[C].New York:Cambridge University Press,1987.
    [9]Ilgen,D.R.,Fisher,C.D.&M.S.Taylor.Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,1979(4).
    [10]Kieras,D.E.&S.Bovair.The role of a mental model in learning to operate a devise[J].Cognitive Science,1984(3).
    [11]Li,L.,Liu,X.&A.L.Steckelberg.Assessor or assessee:How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback[J].British Journal of Educational Technology,2010(3).
    [12]Liu,J.&J.G.Hansen.Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classroom[M].Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press,2002.
    [13]Matsumura,L.C.et al.Teacher feedback,writing assignment quality,and third-grade students'revision in lower-and higher-achieving urban schools[J].The Elementary School Journal,2002(1).
    [14]Nelson,G.L.&J.M.Murphy.Peer response groups:Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts?[J].TESOL Quarterly,1993(1).
    [15]Nelson,M.M.&C.D.Schunn.The nature of feedback:How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance[J].Instructional Science,2009(4).
    [16]Patchan,M.M.&C.D.Schunn.Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback:How students respond to peers'texts of varying quality[J].Instructional Science,2015(5).
    [17]Patchan,M.M.et al.The effects of skill diversity on commenting and revision[J].Instructional Science,2013(2).
    [18]Patchan,M.M.,Schunn,C.D.&R.Correnti.The nature of feedback:How feedback features affect students'implementation rate and quality of revisions[J].Journal of Educational Psychology,2016(8).
    [19]Paulus,T.M.The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,1999(3).
    [20]Topping,K.Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities[J].Review of Educational Research,1998(3).
    [21]Tseng,S.C.&C.C.Tsai.On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback:A study of high school computer course[J].Computers&Education,2007(4).
    [22]Zohrabi,M.&P.Rezaie.The role of form-focused feedback on developing students'writing skill[J].Theory and Practice in Language Studies,2012(7).
    [23]罗莎.MOOC环境下支架型同伴评价探究---以英语写作任务为例[J].外语电化教学,2016(6).
    [24]高瑛等.基于Peerceptiv互评系统的英语写作同伴反馈效果研究[J].外语电化教学,2018(2).
    [25]蒋宇红.在线同伴评价在写作能力发展中的作用[J].外语教学与研究,2005(3).

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700