寒地校园植物景观评价——以东北林业大学校园为例
|
摘要
以具有代表性的林业类寒地校园——东北林业大学校园植物景观为研究对象,将其分为5个区域,进行实地调查,并运用层次分析法从生态、观赏、心理3方面对其进行综合评价,针对其现存问题提出相应的优化对策,以期为寒地校园植物景观的改造和建设提供参考。结果表明:东林校园共有植物180种,隶属于46科96属;经问卷调查得出人们对校园各区植物景观与硬质景观的协调性、与整体环境的和谐性、安全依靠感、舒适愉悦感和对校园植物景观满意度指标的评分,平均分值分别为6.963、7.532、7.071、7.117和7.399;校园植物景观各区综合评价分值分别为7.374、7.929、7.363、7.021和7.396,整体平均分为7.289,均属Ⅱ级。
The campus landscape of Northeast Forestry University,a representative forestry-type cold-field campus,was taken as the research object,and divided into five regions,and the field surveys were conducted,and the hierarchy analysis method was applied to them from the aspects of ecology,appreciation,and psychology. A comprehensive evaluation was carried out and corresponding optimization countermeasures were proposed for the existing problems for the reconstruction and construction of the plant landscape in the cold region. There are 180 species of plants belonging to 96 genera and 96 species in the Donglin Campus. The results of the questionnaire survey show that people coordination of plant landscapes and hard landscapes in all areas of the campus,harmony with the overall environment,sense of safety,comfort and pleasure. The average scores of the stimuli and the scores on campus plant landscape satisfaction were 6.963,7.532,7.071,7.117 and7.399,respectively. The comprehensive evaluation scores of campus plant landscapes were 7.374,7.929,7.363,7.021,and 7.396,respectively,with the average of 7.289,belonging to Class Ⅱ.
The campus landscape of Northeast Forestry University,a representative forestry-type cold-field campus,was taken as the research object,and divided into five regions,and the field surveys were conducted,and the hierarchy analysis method was applied to them from the aspects of ecology,appreciation,and psychology. A comprehensive evaluation was carried out and corresponding optimization countermeasures were proposed for the existing problems for the reconstruction and construction of the plant landscape in the cold region. There are 180 species of plants belonging to 96 genera and 96 species in the Donglin Campus. The results of the questionnaire survey show that people coordination of plant landscapes and hard landscapes in all areas of the campus,harmony with the overall environment,sense of safety,comfort and pleasure. The average scores of the stimuli and the scores on campus plant landscape satisfaction were 6.963,7.532,7.071,7.117 and7.399,respectively. The comprehensive evaluation scores of campus plant landscapes were 7.374,7.929,7.363,7.021,and 7.396,respectively,with the average of 7.289,belonging to Class Ⅱ.
引文
[1]单丹.寒地城市宜居空间营造方法研究[J].城市发展研究,2015,22(9):16-19.
[2]孔庆弘,李文.寒地城市景观的适用性设计[J].东北林业大学学报,2017,45(4):81-83.
[3]HAYNES C,TREXLER C J.The perceptions and needs of volunteers at a University-affiliated Public Garden[J].Horttechnology,2003,13(3):552-555.
[4]黄广远,徐程扬,朱解放,等.基于层次分析法和逼近理想解排序法的高校校园绿地景观评价[J].东北林业大学学报,2012,40(9):113-115.
[5]林锐,李叶芳,姜蕾,等.云南农业大学校园植物景观评价[J].云南农业大学学报(自然科学),2017,32(1):184-190.
[6]李昆仑.层次分析法在城市道路景观评价中的运用[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2005,38(1):143-147.
[7]杜栋,庞庆华,吴炎.现代综合评价方法与案例精选[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2015.
[8]陈娟,周媛.基于层次分析法的西南民族大学航空港校区景观综合评价[J].西南林业大学学报,2016,36(6):101-105.
[9]朱云辰,毛一平.基于层次分析法的浙江大学紫金港东区植物景观评价[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2013,39(4):452-459.
[10]张海霞.南京市高校校园植物景观研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2006.
[11]赵琳,毛洪玉.基于层次分析法的沈阳高校植物景观调查与评价[J].北方园艺,2013(7):85-89.
[12]许志丹,王欣欣,詹旺.高校校园植物景观调查与评价:以吉林师范大学为例[J].吉林师范大学学报(自然科学版),2007,28(2):103-104.
[13]董莹.哈尔滨市高校植物景观评价模型的构建与研究[J].黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报,2012,25(6):5-9.
[14]刘洋,高宇,张睿.基于AHP模型的冬季校园植物景观评价:以东北林业大学为例[J].安徽农业科学,2017,45(4):171-173.
[15]陆东芳.大学校园植物景观评价模型及其应用[J].森林与环境学报,2008,28(4):328-332.
[16]芦建国,李舒仪.公园植物景观综合评价方法及其应用[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2009,33(6):139-142.
[17]许树柏.实用决策方法:层次分析法原理[M].天津:天津大学出版社,1988.
[18]孙明,杜小玉,杨炜茹.北京市公园绿地植物景观评价模型及其应用[J].北京林业大学学报,2010,32(S1):163-167.
[19]杨艺红,魏亮亮,杨巍嵘.基于层次分析法的南通水绘园植物景观美感评价[J].福建林学院学报,2014,34(3):230-235.
[20]杨永川,达良俊.上海乡土树种及其在城市绿化建设中的应用[J].浙江农林大学学报,2005,22(3):286-290.
[21]欧阳子珞,吉文丽,杨梅.西安城市绿地植物多样性分析[J].西北林学院学报,2015,30(2):257-261.
[22]王竞红,卓丽环.哈尔滨市主要高架桥植物景观质量评价[J].东北林业大学学报,2007,35(5):77-78.
[2]孔庆弘,李文.寒地城市景观的适用性设计[J].东北林业大学学报,2017,45(4):81-83.
[3]HAYNES C,TREXLER C J.The perceptions and needs of volunteers at a University-affiliated Public Garden[J].Horttechnology,2003,13(3):552-555.
[4]黄广远,徐程扬,朱解放,等.基于层次分析法和逼近理想解排序法的高校校园绿地景观评价[J].东北林业大学学报,2012,40(9):113-115.
[5]林锐,李叶芳,姜蕾,等.云南农业大学校园植物景观评价[J].云南农业大学学报(自然科学),2017,32(1):184-190.
[6]李昆仑.层次分析法在城市道路景观评价中的运用[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2005,38(1):143-147.
[7]杜栋,庞庆华,吴炎.现代综合评价方法与案例精选[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2015.
[8]陈娟,周媛.基于层次分析法的西南民族大学航空港校区景观综合评价[J].西南林业大学学报,2016,36(6):101-105.
[9]朱云辰,毛一平.基于层次分析法的浙江大学紫金港东区植物景观评价[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2013,39(4):452-459.
[10]张海霞.南京市高校校园植物景观研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2006.
[11]赵琳,毛洪玉.基于层次分析法的沈阳高校植物景观调查与评价[J].北方园艺,2013(7):85-89.
[12]许志丹,王欣欣,詹旺.高校校园植物景观调查与评价:以吉林师范大学为例[J].吉林师范大学学报(自然科学版),2007,28(2):103-104.
[13]董莹.哈尔滨市高校植物景观评价模型的构建与研究[J].黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报,2012,25(6):5-9.
[14]刘洋,高宇,张睿.基于AHP模型的冬季校园植物景观评价:以东北林业大学为例[J].安徽农业科学,2017,45(4):171-173.
[15]陆东芳.大学校园植物景观评价模型及其应用[J].森林与环境学报,2008,28(4):328-332.
[16]芦建国,李舒仪.公园植物景观综合评价方法及其应用[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2009,33(6):139-142.
[17]许树柏.实用决策方法:层次分析法原理[M].天津:天津大学出版社,1988.
[18]孙明,杜小玉,杨炜茹.北京市公园绿地植物景观评价模型及其应用[J].北京林业大学学报,2010,32(S1):163-167.
[19]杨艺红,魏亮亮,杨巍嵘.基于层次分析法的南通水绘园植物景观美感评价[J].福建林学院学报,2014,34(3):230-235.
[20]杨永川,达良俊.上海乡土树种及其在城市绿化建设中的应用[J].浙江农林大学学报,2005,22(3):286-290.
[21]欧阳子珞,吉文丽,杨梅.西安城市绿地植物多样性分析[J].西北林学院学报,2015,30(2):257-261.
[22]王竞红,卓丽环.哈尔滨市主要高架桥植物景观质量评价[J].东北林业大学学报,2007,35(5):77-78.