基于空间开发适宜性评价的石漠化地区可持续发展研究——以贵州省盘州市为例
|
摘要
石漠化地区经济发展与生态环境保护的矛盾是区域可持续发展面临的一大难题。对石漠化地区开发适宜性与区域经济发展的协调关系进行研究,以期为石漠化地区扶贫开发、区域空间管治与社会经济协调发展提供理论指导。利用限制性系数评价和社会经济、交通、生态环境等数据,运用GIS空间分析、IDW空间插值法及相关性分析等方法,对研究区9种主要影响空间开发的生态因子和社会区域经济状况间的联系进行分析。结果表明:1)盘州市经济发展水平与区位优势呈显著正相关关系,空间上呈现出翰林街道、红果街道、两河街道和亦资街道最高,并逐渐向东部、南部和北部降低; 2)受限制性因子的影响,盘州市空间开发适宜性等级主要以Ⅳ级最不适宜为主,面积为2 531. 77 km~2,占区域总面积的62. 42%,主要分布在盘州市东部,Ⅰ级最适宜和Ⅱ级较适宜面积为973. 7 km~2,占区域总面积的24. 00%,主要分布在盘州市南部与西部; 3)盘州市空间开发协调性高的乡镇有6个,协调性一般有17个,协调性低有4个,协调性高的乡镇主要分布在盘州中部及北部,协调性低的乡镇是北部的乌蒙镇、中部的双凤镇、南部的大山镇和普田镇。石漠化地区发展受地理环境影响较大,推进石漠化地区空间开发适宜性评价将促进区域可持续发展。
The study deals with the spatial development suitability between economic development and ecological environment protection,which is a major issue in sustainable development of rocky desertification region. This study can help alleviate the situation of land barrenness and underdevelopment in rocky desertification region,coordinate restrictive coefficient evaluation with social economic. Based on geographic information space analysis,IDW spatial interpolation method and correlation analysis method,the relationship between the ecological factors of nine main influencing spatial development areas and social economic conditions in the study area was analyzed. The results show that: 1) The level of economic development in Panzhou was positively correlated with its location advantage. Hanlin street,Hongguo street,Lianghe street and Yizi street were the highest in space,and gradually decreased to the east,south and north. 2) Influenced by the restrictive factors,the suitability level of Panzhou 's space development is mainly the most unsuitable for Grade IV,with an area of 2 531. 77 km~2,accounting for 62. 42% of the total area. It is mainly distributed in the eastern part of Panzhou City. The suitable area Grade I and Grade II are 973. 7 km~2,accounting for 24. 00% of the total area,mainly distributed in the southern and western areas of Panzhou City. 3) There are 6,17 and 4 towns with high coordination,coordinated and low coordination respectively of space development in Panzhou City. The towns with high coordination are mainly distributed in the central and northern part of Panzhou City.The towns with low coordination are distributed in Wumen Town,Shuangfeng Town,Dashan Town and Putian Town. The development of rocky desertification region is greatly affected by the geographical environment. The promotion of spatial development suitability evaluation in rocky desertification region will promote regional sustainable development.
The study deals with the spatial development suitability between economic development and ecological environment protection,which is a major issue in sustainable development of rocky desertification region. This study can help alleviate the situation of land barrenness and underdevelopment in rocky desertification region,coordinate restrictive coefficient evaluation with social economic. Based on geographic information space analysis,IDW spatial interpolation method and correlation analysis method,the relationship between the ecological factors of nine main influencing spatial development areas and social economic conditions in the study area was analyzed. The results show that: 1) The level of economic development in Panzhou was positively correlated with its location advantage. Hanlin street,Hongguo street,Lianghe street and Yizi street were the highest in space,and gradually decreased to the east,south and north. 2) Influenced by the restrictive factors,the suitability level of Panzhou 's space development is mainly the most unsuitable for Grade IV,with an area of 2 531. 77 km~2,accounting for 62. 42% of the total area. It is mainly distributed in the eastern part of Panzhou City. The suitable area Grade I and Grade II are 973. 7 km~2,accounting for 24. 00% of the total area,mainly distributed in the southern and western areas of Panzhou City. 3) There are 6,17 and 4 towns with high coordination,coordinated and low coordination respectively of space development in Panzhou City. The towns with high coordination are mainly distributed in the central and northern part of Panzhou City.The towns with low coordination are distributed in Wumen Town,Shuangfeng Town,Dashan Town and Putian Town. The development of rocky desertification region is greatly affected by the geographical environment. The promotion of spatial development suitability evaluation in rocky desertification region will promote regional sustainable development.
引文
[1]周忠发,田涟祎,殷超,等.人为干预下喀斯特峰丛盆地区不同土地利用类型的土壤理化性质[J].贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017,35(4):1-6.
[2]谢高地,曹淑艳,冷允法,等.中国可持续发展功能分区[J].资源科学,2012,34(9):1600-1610.
[3]徐增让,张镱锂,成升魁,等.青藏高原区域可持续发展战略思考[J].科技导报,2017,35(6):108-114.
[4]吴鸣然,赵敏.中国不同区域可持续发展能力评价及空间分异[J].上海经济研究,2016(10):84-92.
[5]孙伟.太湖流域空间开发适宜性分区与失衡性评估[J].湖泊科学,2012,24(1):9-16.
[6]王利,蔡乐,王红燕,等.山西省县域经济发展影响因素的空间异质性研究:基于地理加权回归(GWR)模型[J].资源开发与市场,2014,30(2):152-155,166.
[7]BAKLANOV P Y. Indicators,criteria and limitations of regional sustainable development[J]. Geo-information science,2007,9(1):35-39.
[8]邵文慧.基于可持续发展的环渤海区域经济发展战略思考[J].中国水运(学术版),2007,7(4):199-200.
[9]车冰清,孟德友,陆玉麒,等.江苏省空间开发适宜性与土地利用效率的协调性分析[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(5):20-30.
[10]陈诚,陈雯,吕卫国.基于空间开发适宜性分区的城镇建设用地配置:以海安县为例[J].地理科学进展,2009,28(5):775-781.
[11]王晓,路建国,朱伟亚,等.基于空间开发适宜性评价的建设用地扩展配置研究[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2014,45(2):243-251.
[12]孙伟.太湖流域空间开发适宜性分区与失衡性评估[J].湖泊科学,2012,24(1):9-16.
[13]喻忠磊,张文新,梁进社,等.国土空间开发建设适宜性评价研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2015,34(9):1107-1122.
[14]樊杰.我国主体功能区划的科学基础[J].地理学报,2007,62(4):339-350.
[15]顾朝林,张晓明,刘晋媛,等.盐城开发空间区划及其思考[J].地理学报,2007,62(8):787-798.
[16]陆玉麒,林康,张莉.市域空间发展类型区划分的方法探讨:以江苏省仪征市为例[J].地理学报,2007,62(4):351-363.
[17]陈雯,孙伟,段学军,等.苏州地域开发适宜性分区[J].地理学报,2006,61(8):839-846.
[18]熊康宁,陈永毕,陈浒,等.点石成金贵州石漠化治理技术与模式[M].贵阳:贵州科技出版社,2011:12.
[19]周忠发,赵正隆,班镁光,等.喀斯特山区草地资源遥感与GIS典型研究[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,2014:11.
[20]周忠发.基于GIS的喀斯特地区农村土地适宜性评价:以贵州省仁怀市为例[J].贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),2006,24(3):17-19.
[21]张利敏,曹小曙.地理学视角下区域发展空间差异研究进展[J].城市观察,2012(3):61-66.
[22]叶利军.撤县设市谱新篇:写在盘州市成立之际[J].当代贵州,2017,23:48-49.
[23]杨春艳,杨广斌,陈智虎.西南山区不同岩性背景下植被覆盖特征分析:以盘县为例[J].贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),2016,34(6):1-7.
[24]张杰,陈龙燕,卢李朋,等.西藏入境旅游发展与经济增长相关性分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2016,30(2):194-201.
[25]李昕,张明明. SPSS22. 0统计分析从入门到精通[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2017:176-178.
[26]李晓晖,袁峰,贾蔡,等.基于反距离加权和克里格插值的S-A多重分形滤波对比研究[J].测绘科学,2012,37(3):87-89,46.
[27]汤国安,杨昕. Arc GIS地理信息系统空间分析实验教程(第二版)[M].北京:科学出版社,2006:289-292.
[28]贾克敬,张辉,徐小黎,等.面向空间开发利用的土地资源承载力评价技术[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(3):335-341.
[29]李琛,邓文胜.基于GIS的中原城市群经济发展水平差异分析[J].资源开发与市场,2008,24(11):995-996,1030.
[30]孙小涛,周忠发,陈全,等.重点生态功能区水土流失敏感性评价与分布研究:以贵州省雷山县为例[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(6):73-78.
[31]王筱明.基于熵权法的济南市土地利用效益评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(2):96-98.
[2]谢高地,曹淑艳,冷允法,等.中国可持续发展功能分区[J].资源科学,2012,34(9):1600-1610.
[3]徐增让,张镱锂,成升魁,等.青藏高原区域可持续发展战略思考[J].科技导报,2017,35(6):108-114.
[4]吴鸣然,赵敏.中国不同区域可持续发展能力评价及空间分异[J].上海经济研究,2016(10):84-92.
[5]孙伟.太湖流域空间开发适宜性分区与失衡性评估[J].湖泊科学,2012,24(1):9-16.
[6]王利,蔡乐,王红燕,等.山西省县域经济发展影响因素的空间异质性研究:基于地理加权回归(GWR)模型[J].资源开发与市场,2014,30(2):152-155,166.
[7]BAKLANOV P Y. Indicators,criteria and limitations of regional sustainable development[J]. Geo-information science,2007,9(1):35-39.
[8]邵文慧.基于可持续发展的环渤海区域经济发展战略思考[J].中国水运(学术版),2007,7(4):199-200.
[9]车冰清,孟德友,陆玉麒,等.江苏省空间开发适宜性与土地利用效率的协调性分析[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(5):20-30.
[10]陈诚,陈雯,吕卫国.基于空间开发适宜性分区的城镇建设用地配置:以海安县为例[J].地理科学进展,2009,28(5):775-781.
[11]王晓,路建国,朱伟亚,等.基于空间开发适宜性评价的建设用地扩展配置研究[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2014,45(2):243-251.
[12]孙伟.太湖流域空间开发适宜性分区与失衡性评估[J].湖泊科学,2012,24(1):9-16.
[13]喻忠磊,张文新,梁进社,等.国土空间开发建设适宜性评价研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2015,34(9):1107-1122.
[14]樊杰.我国主体功能区划的科学基础[J].地理学报,2007,62(4):339-350.
[15]顾朝林,张晓明,刘晋媛,等.盐城开发空间区划及其思考[J].地理学报,2007,62(8):787-798.
[16]陆玉麒,林康,张莉.市域空间发展类型区划分的方法探讨:以江苏省仪征市为例[J].地理学报,2007,62(4):351-363.
[17]陈雯,孙伟,段学军,等.苏州地域开发适宜性分区[J].地理学报,2006,61(8):839-846.
[18]熊康宁,陈永毕,陈浒,等.点石成金贵州石漠化治理技术与模式[M].贵阳:贵州科技出版社,2011:12.
[19]周忠发,赵正隆,班镁光,等.喀斯特山区草地资源遥感与GIS典型研究[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,2014:11.
[20]周忠发.基于GIS的喀斯特地区农村土地适宜性评价:以贵州省仁怀市为例[J].贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),2006,24(3):17-19.
[21]张利敏,曹小曙.地理学视角下区域发展空间差异研究进展[J].城市观察,2012(3):61-66.
[22]叶利军.撤县设市谱新篇:写在盘州市成立之际[J].当代贵州,2017,23:48-49.
[23]杨春艳,杨广斌,陈智虎.西南山区不同岩性背景下植被覆盖特征分析:以盘县为例[J].贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),2016,34(6):1-7.
[24]张杰,陈龙燕,卢李朋,等.西藏入境旅游发展与经济增长相关性分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2016,30(2):194-201.
[25]李昕,张明明. SPSS22. 0统计分析从入门到精通[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2017:176-178.
[26]李晓晖,袁峰,贾蔡,等.基于反距离加权和克里格插值的S-A多重分形滤波对比研究[J].测绘科学,2012,37(3):87-89,46.
[27]汤国安,杨昕. Arc GIS地理信息系统空间分析实验教程(第二版)[M].北京:科学出版社,2006:289-292.
[28]贾克敬,张辉,徐小黎,等.面向空间开发利用的土地资源承载力评价技术[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(3):335-341.
[29]李琛,邓文胜.基于GIS的中原城市群经济发展水平差异分析[J].资源开发与市场,2008,24(11):995-996,1030.
[30]孙小涛,周忠发,陈全,等.重点生态功能区水土流失敏感性评价与分布研究:以贵州省雷山县为例[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(6):73-78.
[31]王筱明.基于熵权法的济南市土地利用效益评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(2):96-98.