煤矿企业安全文化水平综合评价及改进策略
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Research on Comprehensive Evaluation and Improvement Strategy of Safety Culture Level in Coal Mine Enterprises
  • 作者:赵鹏飞 ; 贺阿红
  • 英文作者:ZHAO Pengfei;HE Ahong;School of Management Engineering and Business,Hebei University of Engineering;
  • 关键词:煤矿企业 ; 安全文化 ; M(1 ; 2 ; 3)模型 ; 安全水平评价 ; 改进策略
  • 英文关键词:coal mine enterprise;;safety culture;;M(1,2,3) model;;safety level evaluation;;improvement strategy
  • 中文刊名:MKAQ
  • 英文刊名:Safety in Coal Mines
  • 机构:河北工程大学管理工程与商学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-07-20
  • 出版单位:煤矿安全
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.50;No.541
  • 基金:河北省社会科学基金资助项目(HB18GL027)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:MKAQ201907071
  • 页数:4
  • CN:07
  • ISSN:21-1232/TD
  • 分类号:307-310
摘要
煤矿企业安全文化的作用日益明显,安全文化水平的高低与企业安全水平及安全绩效有着密切关系。为了有效衡量企业安全文化水平的高低,基于M(1,2,3)模型的评价方法对案例企业的安全文化水平进行了模糊综合评价。结果表明:案例企业安全文化水平较高,但是仍有改进空间,安全管理文化建设是该企业安全文化改进的重点内容;应该通过激励和监察并行的措施,规范员工的不安全行为,从而改善案例企业的安全管理文化;注重员工安全意识的培养,提高企业的安全观念文化;进一步规范"三违"行为,提高企业的安全行为文化;加大安全投入,改善工作环境,提升设备安全性,提高安全物态文化,最终实现该企业安全文化水平的整体提高。
        The role of safety culture in coal mine enterprises is becoming more and more obvious, and the level of safety culture is closely related to the safety level and safety performance. To effectively measure the level of safety culture, this paper makes a comprehensive evaluation of the safety culture level of case enterprises by using M(1,2,3) model. The results show that the case enterprise safety culture level is higher, but there is still room for improvement. Safety management culture construction is the important content of the improvement of safety culture of the enterprise, and the unsafe behaviors of employees should be regulated through incentive and supervision, so as to improve the safety management culture of the case company; pay attention to the training of employees' safety awareness to improve the safety concept of enterprise culture; further standardize the "three violations"behavior to improve the safety behavior culture of the enterprise; increase the safety investment to improve the working environment, improve the safety of equipment, improve the safety culture, and finally achieve the overall improvement of the safety culture level of the enterprise.
引文
[1]傅贵,王秀明,李亚.事故致因“2-4”模型及其事故原因因素编码研究[J].安全与环境学报,2017,17(3):1003-1008.
    [2]傅贵,杨春,殷文韬,等.行为安全“2-4”模型的扩展版[J].煤炭学报,2014,39(6):994-999.
    [3]安泽,刘大鹏.基于2-4模型的安全文化元素改进及实证应用[J].矿业安全与环保,2017,44(5):111.
    [4]栾兴华.化险为益-企业安全文化建设实务[M].深圳:海天出版社,2009.
    [5]李永卉,林海飞,王振平,等.基于结构方程模型的煤矿企业安全文化影响因素研究[J].煤矿安全,2017,48(5):236-239.
    [6]田水承,刘芬,杨禄,等.基于计划行为理论的矿工不安全行为研究[J].矿业安全与环保,2014,41(1):109-112.
    [7]曹庆仁,李凯,刘丽娜.煤矿安全文化对员工行为安全影响作用的实证研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2011,21(4):143-149.
    [8]El Bardissi A W,Wiegmann D A,Dearani J A,et al.Application of the human factors analysis and classification system methodology to the cardiovascular surgery operating room[J].The Annals of Thoracic Surgery,2007,83(4):1412-1419.
    [9]张维群.数据挖掘研究和应用的现状和前景[J].统计与信息论坛,2004,19(1):95-96.
    [10]刘开第,赵奇,周少玲.机械产品方案设计模糊综合评价中隶属度转换的新方法[J].机械工程学报,2009,45(12):162-166.
    [11]程乾生.属性识别理论模型及应用[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),1997,33(1):23-30.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700