常规护理和优质护理在老年高血压护理中的效果
|
摘要
目的比较常规护理和优质护理在老年高血压护理中的效果。方法选取我院接诊的高血压患者120例。对照组60例进行常规护理,观察组60例进行优质护理服务,对比两组患者的血压水平和护理满意度。结果观察组患者的护理满意度为98.33%,高于对照组的88.33%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者护理前的血压水平对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),护理后观察组患者的血压水平低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对老年高血压患者开展优质护理服务,能够帮助患者稳步降低血压,同时提高患者的护理满意度。
Objective To compare the effect of routine nursing and high quality nursing in elderly patients with hypertension. Methods 120 hypertensive patients in our hospital were selected. In the control group, 60 cases were given routine nursing, while 60 cases in the observation group received high-quality nursing service. The blood pressure level and nursing satisfaction of two groups were compared. Results The nursing satisfaction of the patients in the observation group was 98.33%, which was significantly higher than that of the control group(88.33%), the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05); The blood pressure level of the two groups before nursing was compared, the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05), and the blood pressure level of the patients in the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group after nursing, and the level of blood pressure in the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Carrying out high quality nursing service for elderly patients with hypertension can help patients steadily reduce their blood pressure and improve their nursing satisfaction.
Objective To compare the effect of routine nursing and high quality nursing in elderly patients with hypertension. Methods 120 hypertensive patients in our hospital were selected. In the control group, 60 cases were given routine nursing, while 60 cases in the observation group received high-quality nursing service. The blood pressure level and nursing satisfaction of two groups were compared. Results The nursing satisfaction of the patients in the observation group was 98.33%, which was significantly higher than that of the control group(88.33%), the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05); The blood pressure level of the two groups before nursing was compared, the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05), and the blood pressure level of the patients in the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group after nursing, and the level of blood pressure in the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Carrying out high quality nursing service for elderly patients with hypertension can help patients steadily reduce their blood pressure and improve their nursing satisfaction.
引文
[1]邓棣文.老年高血压患者的社区护理干预效果研究[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2017,28(1):209
[2]舒平艳,佘秀英.老年高血压患者社区护理干预效果分析[J].湖北科技学院学报(医学版),2016,30(2):160-163.
[3]魏小敏.护理干预在改善社区老年高血压患者生活质量中的应用研究[J].中国当代医药,2016,23(3):179-181.
[4]陈妙兰,罗辉娥,彭惠媚.社区护理干预在高血压患者中的应用[J].辽宁医学院学报,2016,37(2):81-85.
[5]楼俞艳.优质护理服务在老年性脑梗死护理中的应用效果观察[J].临床合理用药杂志,2014,7(23):122-123.
[6]苗慧.优质护理服务在老年性高血压护理中的应用[J].中西医结合心血管病学电子杂志,2014,2(10):129.
[7]刘凤霞.老年高血压护理应用优质护理服务的临床分析[J].中国实用医药,2017,12(23):163-164.
[8]刘甜,刘杏,李胜玲.基于跨理论模型的社区家庭访视护理对老年高血压患者服药遵从行为的影响[J].中华护理杂志,2016,51(5):629-634.
[9]刘怡.优质护理服务在老年高血压临床护理中的应用[J].养生保健指南,2017(41):54.
[10]惠巧维.论优质护理服务在老年高血压护理中的应用[J].养生保健指南,2017(27):54.
[11]刘洋.优质护理服务在老年高血压护理中的应用观察[J].现代养生,2017(8):184.
[12]郭万红.优质护理在老年高血压脑出血患者中的应用效果[J].基层医学论坛,2016,20(11):1561-1563.
[2]舒平艳,佘秀英.老年高血压患者社区护理干预效果分析[J].湖北科技学院学报(医学版),2016,30(2):160-163.
[3]魏小敏.护理干预在改善社区老年高血压患者生活质量中的应用研究[J].中国当代医药,2016,23(3):179-181.
[4]陈妙兰,罗辉娥,彭惠媚.社区护理干预在高血压患者中的应用[J].辽宁医学院学报,2016,37(2):81-85.
[5]楼俞艳.优质护理服务在老年性脑梗死护理中的应用效果观察[J].临床合理用药杂志,2014,7(23):122-123.
[6]苗慧.优质护理服务在老年性高血压护理中的应用[J].中西医结合心血管病学电子杂志,2014,2(10):129.
[7]刘凤霞.老年高血压护理应用优质护理服务的临床分析[J].中国实用医药,2017,12(23):163-164.
[8]刘甜,刘杏,李胜玲.基于跨理论模型的社区家庭访视护理对老年高血压患者服药遵从行为的影响[J].中华护理杂志,2016,51(5):629-634.
[9]刘怡.优质护理服务在老年高血压临床护理中的应用[J].养生保健指南,2017(41):54.
[10]惠巧维.论优质护理服务在老年高血压护理中的应用[J].养生保健指南,2017(27):54.
[11]刘洋.优质护理服务在老年高血压护理中的应用观察[J].现代养生,2017(8):184.
[12]郭万红.优质护理在老年高血压脑出血患者中的应用效果[J].基层医学论坛,2016,20(11):1561-1563.