无创通气治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的临床效果观察
|
摘要
目的观察无创通气治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的临床治疗效果。方法本研究选取我院收治的86例慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者进行分析,选取时段为2014年5月~2016年5月,采用随机数字表法进行平均分组,其中43例给予常规治疗的患者为对照组,而另43例给予无创通气治疗的患者为实验组,治疗后将两组患者的临床治疗效果进行比较和分析。结果与对照组相比,实验组患者的治疗总有效率、二氧化碳分压、动脉血氧分压、住院时间均明显较优,差异有统计学意义,P<0.05。结论在慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期治疗中给予无创通气治疗效果理想。
Objective To observe the clinical effect of noninvasive ventilation in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods This study selected 86 patients admitted to our hospital for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients were analyzed from May 2014 to May 2016,were randomly divided into two groups,including 43 cases of patients received routine treatment as control group,and the other 43 patients were treated with noninvasive ventilation in the treatment of patients in experimental group after treatment,the clinical therapeutic effect of two groups of patients were compared and analyzed. Results Compared with the control group,the total effective rate,carbon dioxide partial pressure,arterial partial pressure of oxygen,hospitalization time were significantly better in the experimental group,the difference was statistically significant,P<0.05. Conclusion Noninvasive ventilation is effective in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Objective To observe the clinical effect of noninvasive ventilation in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods This study selected 86 patients admitted to our hospital for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients were analyzed from May 2014 to May 2016,were randomly divided into two groups,including 43 cases of patients received routine treatment as control group,and the other 43 patients were treated with noninvasive ventilation in the treatment of patients in experimental group after treatment,the clinical therapeutic effect of two groups of patients were compared and analyzed. Results Compared with the control group,the total effective rate,carbon dioxide partial pressure,arterial partial pressure of oxygen,hospitalization time were significantly better in the experimental group,the difference was statistically significant,P<0.05. Conclusion Noninvasive ventilation is effective in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
引文
[1]侯秀娟.中医药配合无创通气治疗慢阻肺急性加重期呼吸衰竭临床观察进展[J].中国药物经济学,2013,8(3):434-435.
[2]郭永明,陈世谋,刘宇,等.无创正压通气治疗老年慢阻肺急性加重期患者的疗效评估与分析[J].福建医药杂志,2014,35(5):34-36.
[3]廖小雯,陈玉梅,廖美玲,等.肺部感染程度对无创通气治疗慢阻肺急性加重期合并呼吸衰竭疗效的影响[J].临床医学工程,2016,23(4):501-502.
[4]王贵臣,李侠.无创通气在治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者中的应用价值[J].中国民康医学,2015,27(13):57-58.
[5]王同莉,何美燕,张颖洁.无创通气治疗慢阻肺急性加重期的临床效果[J].黑龙江医药,2016,29(5):962-964.
[6]赵燕.纳诺酮联合无创通气治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并Ⅱ型呼衰的临床疗效观察[J].吉林医学,2013,34(25):5189-5190.
[7]赖树初,陈恩超,许旭东.Bi PAP无创通气联合痰热清注射液治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性呼吸衰竭疗效观察[J].中国现代药物应用,2013,7(13):32-34.
[8]丁震,刘骅,陈洁,等.不同雾化方法吸入布地奈德在慢阻肺急性加重期疗效及血药浓度对比研究[J].临床肺科杂志,2015,20(11):2027-2030.
[9]高欣.无创通气对老年间质性肺炎合并呼吸衰竭患者临床疗效观察[J].中国继续医学教育,2015,7(24):113-114.
[2]郭永明,陈世谋,刘宇,等.无创正压通气治疗老年慢阻肺急性加重期患者的疗效评估与分析[J].福建医药杂志,2014,35(5):34-36.
[3]廖小雯,陈玉梅,廖美玲,等.肺部感染程度对无创通气治疗慢阻肺急性加重期合并呼吸衰竭疗效的影响[J].临床医学工程,2016,23(4):501-502.
[4]王贵臣,李侠.无创通气在治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者中的应用价值[J].中国民康医学,2015,27(13):57-58.
[5]王同莉,何美燕,张颖洁.无创通气治疗慢阻肺急性加重期的临床效果[J].黑龙江医药,2016,29(5):962-964.
[6]赵燕.纳诺酮联合无创通气治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并Ⅱ型呼衰的临床疗效观察[J].吉林医学,2013,34(25):5189-5190.
[7]赖树初,陈恩超,许旭东.Bi PAP无创通气联合痰热清注射液治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性呼吸衰竭疗效观察[J].中国现代药物应用,2013,7(13):32-34.
[8]丁震,刘骅,陈洁,等.不同雾化方法吸入布地奈德在慢阻肺急性加重期疗效及血药浓度对比研究[J].临床肺科杂志,2015,20(11):2027-2030.
[9]高欣.无创通气对老年间质性肺炎合并呼吸衰竭患者临床疗效观察[J].中国继续医学教育,2015,7(24):113-114.