马克思主义法权关系理论的科学内涵与现实价值
|
摘要
历史观之,法权关系是政治国家产生和发展的历史逻辑、理论逻辑及政治逻辑交互作用的产物,法权关系与政治国家及其法治道路之间存在着本质联系,法权关系是政治国家合法性存在的依据,也是政治国家法治道路的核心要素,资本主义法权关系终究要被共产主义法权关系所替代。现实观之,中国特色社会主义法权关系从马克思主义法权关系理论中汲取了实践性和人民性的理论品格,为世界法治道路发展提供了中国范式。
In the view of history,law-right relationship is the result of the interaction of the historical logic,theoretical logic and political logic during the emergence and development of the political state.Law-right relationship has an essential connection with ploitical states and their roads of ruling of law.The law-right relationship is the basis of the legitimacy of the political states and the core element of the roads of ruling of law for the political countries. The law-right relationship of Capitalist will be replaced by that of Communist. Inthe view of reality,the law-right reationship of socialism with Chinese characteristics draws the theoretical character of practice and peolpe-centered from the Marxist theory of law-right reationship,and provides Chinese paradigm for the development road of rule of law in the world.
In the view of history,law-right relationship is the result of the interaction of the historical logic,theoretical logic and political logic during the emergence and development of the political state.Law-right relationship has an essential connection with ploitical states and their roads of ruling of law.The law-right relationship is the basis of the legitimacy of the political states and the core element of the roads of ruling of law for the political countries. The law-right relationship of Capitalist will be replaced by that of Communist. Inthe view of reality,the law-right reationship of socialism with Chinese characteristics draws the theoretical character of practice and peolpe-centered from the Marxist theory of law-right reationship,and provides Chinese paradigm for the development road of rule of law in the world.
引文
[1]马克思恩格斯选集:第一卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2012:2,212,411,402,405,403,38,43,10,166,416,415.
[2]马克思.资本论:第一卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2004:103.
[3]恩格斯.家庭、私有制和国家的起源[M].北京:人民出版社,2009:176-177.
[4]列宁.国家与革命[M].北京:人民出版社,2006:5,6.
[5]马克思.哥达纲领批判[M].北京:人民出版社,1956:10.
[6]马克思.1844年经济学哲学手稿[M].北京:人民出版社,2008:182,183,173,85,81,56.
[7]梅荣政.西方宪政民主的“基因缺陷”[J].红旗文稿,2017(12):38.
[8]黄震.中华法系与世界主要法律体系---从法系到法律样式的学术史考察[J].法学杂志,2012(9):43-49.
[9][美]伯尔曼.法律与宗教[M].北京:商务印书馆,2012:23-24.
[10]陈顾远.中国文化与中国法系[M].北京:中国政法大学出版,2006:51-60.
[11]李路曲.后发展国家法治建设的政治生态分析---以新加坡为例[J].中共中央党校学报,2015(1):22-29.
[12]杨昌宇.从“宗法-专制”到“威权-法制”:当代俄罗斯法治文化模式的实践转向[J].学术交流,2015(12):73-78.
[13]LARRY CATA BACKER.The party as polity,the communist party and the Chinese Constitutional State:a theory of state-party constitutionalism[J].Journal of Chinese and Comparative Law,2009(16):101-168.
[14][英]弗里德里希·奥古斯特·哈耶克.通往奴役之路[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1997:71.
[2]马克思.资本论:第一卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2004:103.
[3]恩格斯.家庭、私有制和国家的起源[M].北京:人民出版社,2009:176-177.
[4]列宁.国家与革命[M].北京:人民出版社,2006:5,6.
[5]马克思.哥达纲领批判[M].北京:人民出版社,1956:10.
[6]马克思.1844年经济学哲学手稿[M].北京:人民出版社,2008:182,183,173,85,81,56.
[7]梅荣政.西方宪政民主的“基因缺陷”[J].红旗文稿,2017(12):38.
[8]黄震.中华法系与世界主要法律体系---从法系到法律样式的学术史考察[J].法学杂志,2012(9):43-49.
[9][美]伯尔曼.法律与宗教[M].北京:商务印书馆,2012:23-24.
[10]陈顾远.中国文化与中国法系[M].北京:中国政法大学出版,2006:51-60.
[11]李路曲.后发展国家法治建设的政治生态分析---以新加坡为例[J].中共中央党校学报,2015(1):22-29.
[12]杨昌宇.从“宗法-专制”到“威权-法制”:当代俄罗斯法治文化模式的实践转向[J].学术交流,2015(12):73-78.
[13]LARRY CATA BACKER.The party as polity,the communist party and the Chinese Constitutional State:a theory of state-party constitutionalism[J].Journal of Chinese and Comparative Law,2009(16):101-168.
[14][英]弗里德里希·奥古斯特·哈耶克.通往奴役之路[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1997:71.