慢性前列腺炎患者实施水蛭蜈蚣栓加入微波治疗的效果
|
摘要
目的:探讨慢性前列腺炎患者实施水蛭蜈蚣栓加入微波治疗的效果。方法:对泸州市中医医院2015年4月至2017年4月收治的80例慢性前列腺炎患者的临床资料进行统计分析,依据治疗方法将这些患者分为水蛭蜈蚣栓加入微波治疗组(联合治疗组,n=40)和单独微波治疗组(单独治疗组,n=40)两组,对两组患者的临床症状、临床疗效、性生活质量进行统计分析。结果:联合治疗组患者的疼痛或不适、排尿异常、生活质量评分及NIH-CPSI总分均显著低于单独治疗组,差异具有统计学意义(P <0. 05),治疗的总有效率90. 0%(36/40)显著高于单独治疗组72. 5%(29/40),差异具有统计学意义(P <0. 05),性欲、性唤起、性高潮、性生活频率、性生活接受度、性关系满意度评分均显著高于单独治疗组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0. 05),性行为症状发生比例评分显著低于单独治疗组,差异具有统计学意义(P <0. 05)。结论:慢性前列腺炎患者实施水蛭蜈蚣栓加入微波治疗的效果较单独微波治疗好。
Objective: To investigate the effect of microwave treatment with leech and centipede suppository of patients with chronic prostatitis. Methods: The clinical data of 80 cases of patients with chronic prostatitis in our hospital from April 2015 to April 2017 were statistically analyzed,these patients were divided into treatment group microwave treatment with leech and centipede suppository treatment group( combined treatment group,n = 40) and separate microwave therapy group( single treatment group,n = 40) two groups according to the treatment methods,the clinical symptoms,clinical efficacy,quality of life of the two groups were statistically analyzed. Results: The pain or discomfort,abnormal urination,quality of life scores and NIH-CPSI score of the combined treatment group were significantly lower( P < 0. 05),the total treatment efficiency 90. 0%( 36/40) was significantly higher than the single treatment group 72. 5%( 29/40)( P < 0. 05),the sexuality and sexual arouse,orgasm,sexual life frequency life,acceptance,relationship satisfaction scores were significantly higher( P < 0. 05),the sex proportion of symptoms score was significantly lower than the single treatment group( P < 0. 05). Conclusions: The effect of microwave treatment with leech and centipede suppository is better than separate microwave therapy of patients with chronic prostatitis.
Objective: To investigate the effect of microwave treatment with leech and centipede suppository of patients with chronic prostatitis. Methods: The clinical data of 80 cases of patients with chronic prostatitis in our hospital from April 2015 to April 2017 were statistically analyzed,these patients were divided into treatment group microwave treatment with leech and centipede suppository treatment group( combined treatment group,n = 40) and separate microwave therapy group( single treatment group,n = 40) two groups according to the treatment methods,the clinical symptoms,clinical efficacy,quality of life of the two groups were statistically analyzed. Results: The pain or discomfort,abnormal urination,quality of life scores and NIH-CPSI score of the combined treatment group were significantly lower( P < 0. 05),the total treatment efficiency 90. 0%( 36/40) was significantly higher than the single treatment group 72. 5%( 29/40)( P < 0. 05),the sexuality and sexual arouse,orgasm,sexual life frequency life,acceptance,relationship satisfaction scores were significantly higher( P < 0. 05),the sex proportion of symptoms score was significantly lower than the single treatment group( P < 0. 05). Conclusions: The effect of microwave treatment with leech and centipede suppository is better than separate microwave therapy of patients with chronic prostatitis.
引文
[1]吴春雷.心理治疗对慢性前列腺炎患者疗效评价.现代泌尿外科杂志,2012,17(4):353-353.
[2]吴镝.中西医结合治疗慢性前列腺炎效果观察.现代中西医结合杂志,2012,21(15):1645-1646.
[3]李海松,韩亮,王彬.慢性前列腺炎的中医药研究进展与思考.环球中医药,2012,5(7):481-484.
[4]刘宁.消前列腺炎方结合微波治疗慢性前列腺炎临床分析.现代诊断与治疗,2012,23(9):1397-1398.
[5]张奕全.微波治疗慢性前列腺炎的临床研究.实用医技杂志,2007,14(28):3902-3903.
[6]杨娟.微波治疗老年慢性前列腺炎患者的护理体会.中国中医药现代远程教育,2012,10(14):138-139.
[7]陈伟民.对中西医结合诊治慢性前列腺炎有关问题的探讨.中国临床医生,2012,40(10):11-13.
[8]王界宇.左氧氟沙星胶囊联合前列安栓治疗慢性前列腺炎疗效观察.河北医药,2014,11(9):251-252.
[9]王界宇,于萍.前列舒通胶囊联合左氧氟沙星治疗慢性前列腺炎疗效观察.中国临床医生,2013,18(6):128-129.
[10]张育铭,童建卫.中西医结合治疗慢性前列腺炎113例疗效观察.当代医学,2009,15(31):155-156.
[11]裴国明,谢礼豪,陈松伟.阿奇霉素联合康美键胶囊治疗慢性前列腺炎疗效观察.岭南皮肤性病科杂志,2013,21(1):154-155.
[12]周健铭,何倩.中西医结合治疗慢性前列腺炎42例临床疗效观察.中国现代医生,2009,47(21):107-108.
[13]吴骏,曾庆琪.慢性前列腺炎外治法临床研究进展.世界中西医结合杂志,2011,6(5):434-437.
[14]李宪锐,张耀圣,商建伟,等.慢性前列腺炎的中西医治疗研究进展.中国性科学,2015,24(10):67-70.
[15]马强,贾国金,金伟,等.左氧氟沙星联合盐酸坦索罗辛及宁泌泰治疗慢性前列腺炎的疗效观察.中国性科学,2015,24(10):11-13.
[16] PapeD,Pasini M,JeronIA,et al. Detection of sexually transmitted pathogens in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain:A prospective clinical study. International Journal of Std&Aids,2017,28(6):613-615.
[17] Chopra S,Satkunasivam R,Aron M. Feasibility of robotic radical prostatectomy for medication refractory chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome:Initial results. Indian Journal of Urology,2016,32(3):238-241.
[18] Li HJ,Kang DY. Prevalence of sexual dysfunction in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome:a meta-analysis. World Journal of Urology,2016,34(7):1009-1017.
[2]吴镝.中西医结合治疗慢性前列腺炎效果观察.现代中西医结合杂志,2012,21(15):1645-1646.
[3]李海松,韩亮,王彬.慢性前列腺炎的中医药研究进展与思考.环球中医药,2012,5(7):481-484.
[4]刘宁.消前列腺炎方结合微波治疗慢性前列腺炎临床分析.现代诊断与治疗,2012,23(9):1397-1398.
[5]张奕全.微波治疗慢性前列腺炎的临床研究.实用医技杂志,2007,14(28):3902-3903.
[6]杨娟.微波治疗老年慢性前列腺炎患者的护理体会.中国中医药现代远程教育,2012,10(14):138-139.
[7]陈伟民.对中西医结合诊治慢性前列腺炎有关问题的探讨.中国临床医生,2012,40(10):11-13.
[8]王界宇.左氧氟沙星胶囊联合前列安栓治疗慢性前列腺炎疗效观察.河北医药,2014,11(9):251-252.
[9]王界宇,于萍.前列舒通胶囊联合左氧氟沙星治疗慢性前列腺炎疗效观察.中国临床医生,2013,18(6):128-129.
[10]张育铭,童建卫.中西医结合治疗慢性前列腺炎113例疗效观察.当代医学,2009,15(31):155-156.
[11]裴国明,谢礼豪,陈松伟.阿奇霉素联合康美键胶囊治疗慢性前列腺炎疗效观察.岭南皮肤性病科杂志,2013,21(1):154-155.
[12]周健铭,何倩.中西医结合治疗慢性前列腺炎42例临床疗效观察.中国现代医生,2009,47(21):107-108.
[13]吴骏,曾庆琪.慢性前列腺炎外治法临床研究进展.世界中西医结合杂志,2011,6(5):434-437.
[14]李宪锐,张耀圣,商建伟,等.慢性前列腺炎的中西医治疗研究进展.中国性科学,2015,24(10):67-70.
[15]马强,贾国金,金伟,等.左氧氟沙星联合盐酸坦索罗辛及宁泌泰治疗慢性前列腺炎的疗效观察.中国性科学,2015,24(10):11-13.
[16] PapeD,Pasini M,JeronIA,et al. Detection of sexually transmitted pathogens in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain:A prospective clinical study. International Journal of Std&Aids,2017,28(6):613-615.
[17] Chopra S,Satkunasivam R,Aron M. Feasibility of robotic radical prostatectomy for medication refractory chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome:Initial results. Indian Journal of Urology,2016,32(3):238-241.
[18] Li HJ,Kang DY. Prevalence of sexual dysfunction in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome:a meta-analysis. World Journal of Urology,2016,34(7):1009-1017.