城市效率测度及其空间分布特征研究——基于浙江省11个地级市的数据分析
|
摘要
鉴于城市资源的有限性,城市效率问题在我国城市化发展研究中已不容忽视。利用数据包络分析法,选取城市发展的各项投入产出指标,测算出浙江省各地级市的综合效率、纯技术效率及规模效率,探究其空间分布特征,划分城市效率高低的地域类型并开展空间自相关性研究。研究结果表明:浙江省各地级市的城市效率均有待提高;三种城市效率在空间上的分布特征各有异同;城市综合效率存在空间负相关性,规模效率存在空间正相关性,纯技术效率存在空间负相关性且呈现低高集聚区及高低集聚区。这些结论为促进浙江省各城市高效发展提供了理论依据和参考价值。
The problems of urban efficiency in the urban development process cannot be neglected due to the limited resources.This paper selects the appropriate input and output indicators to measure the urban comprehensive efficiency,pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency of country-level cities by DEA analysis,analyzes the spatial distribution,divides the geographical districts by the urban efficiency and studies the type of correlation between spatial autocorrelation.The conclusion is that:1)The urban efficiency of country-level cities in Zhejiang Province needs to be improved;2)Each of the urban efficiency in the spatial distribution is similar but meanwhile different;3)The urban comprehensive efficiency presents a negative correlation,the scale efficiency shows a positive correlation,the pure technical efficiency appears a negative correlation and has areas between low-level and high-level.These conclusions provide a theoretical basis and reference value for the cities in Zhejiang Province so as to promote their high efficient development.
The problems of urban efficiency in the urban development process cannot be neglected due to the limited resources.This paper selects the appropriate input and output indicators to measure the urban comprehensive efficiency,pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency of country-level cities by DEA analysis,analyzes the spatial distribution,divides the geographical districts by the urban efficiency and studies the type of correlation between spatial autocorrelation.The conclusion is that:1)The urban efficiency of country-level cities in Zhejiang Province needs to be improved;2)Each of the urban efficiency in the spatial distribution is similar but meanwhile different;3)The urban comprehensive efficiency presents a negative correlation,the scale efficiency shows a positive correlation,the pure technical efficiency appears a negative correlation and has areas between low-level and high-level.These conclusions provide a theoretical basis and reference value for the cities in Zhejiang Province so as to promote their high efficient development.
引文
[1]袁晓玲,张占军,贺斌.中国城市效率评析[J].城市问题,2015(9):12-17,29.
[2]沈惠新,严士清.基于县域尺度的中国沿海地区效率分析[J].地理与地理信息科学,2011,27(1):59-63.
[3]孙威,董冠鹏.基于DEA模型的中国资源型城市效率及其变化[J].地理研究,2010,29(12):2155-2165.
[4]于新淮,田晶华.略论中心城市的经济发展[J].中国工业经济,1998,16(5):59-60.
[5]孟德友,李小建,陆玉麒,等.长江三角洲地区城市经济发展水平空间格局演变[J].经济地理,2014,34(2):50-57.
[6]柴攀峰,黄中伟.基于协同发展的长三角城市群空间格局研究[J].经济地理,2014,34(6):75-79.
[7]张麟,刘光中,王纬,等.城市系统效率的差异及对我国城市化进程的影响[J].软科学,2011,15(3):65-67.
[8]Macmillan W D.The estimation and applications of multi-regional economic planning models using data envelopment analysis[J].Papers of the Regional Science Association,1986(21):60-68.
[9]Charnes A,Cooper W,Li S.Using Data Envelopment Analysis to Evaluate Efficiency in the Economic Performance of Chinese Cities[J].Socio-economic Planning Science,1989(23):325-344.
[10]李郇,徐现祥,陈浩辉.20世纪90年代中国城市效率的时空变化[J].地理学报,2005,60(4):615-625.
[11]郭腾云,徐勇,王志强.基于DEA的中国特大城市资源效率及其变化[J].地理学报,2009,64(4):408-416.
[12]张军涛,刘建国.城市效率及其溢出效应---以东北三省34个地级市为例[J].经济地理,2011,31(4):578-583.
[13]于珊珊,彭鹏,田小琴,等.基于DEA模型的湖南省资源型城市效率变化研究[J].科技和产业,2012,12(5):32-36.
[14]方创琳,关兴良.中国城市群投入产出效率的综合测度与空间分异[J].地理学报,2011,66(8):1011-1022.
[15]梁流涛,赵庆良,陈聪.中国城市土地利用效率空间分异特征及优化路径分析[J].中国土地科学,2013,27(7):48-54.
[16]潘竟虎,尹君.中国地级及以上城市发展效率差异的DEA-ESDA测度[J].经济地理,2012,32(12):54-60.
[17]张俊容,郭耀煌.评价指标与DEA有效的关系[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2004,13(6):520-523.
[18]张军涛,刘建国.城市效率及其溢出效应---以东北三省34个地级市为例[J].经济地理,2011,31(4):578-590.
[19]戴永安.中国城市化效率及其影响因素---基于随机前沿生产函数的分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2010,6(12):103-117.
[20]陈修颖,陈颖.浙江省科技资源的区域差异及其空间配置效率研究[J].地理科学,2012,32(4):418-425.
[21]金晓雨,郑军.中国城市效率与城市规模研究---基于非参数与半参数的实证[J].软科学,2015,29(3):107-110.
[22]高健.人口规模、空间溢出与城市效率关系的实证分析[J].统计与决策,2018,34(2):90-94.
[23]柯善咨,赵曜.产业结构、城市规模与中国城市生产率[J].经济研究,2014,(4):76-88.
[2]沈惠新,严士清.基于县域尺度的中国沿海地区效率分析[J].地理与地理信息科学,2011,27(1):59-63.
[3]孙威,董冠鹏.基于DEA模型的中国资源型城市效率及其变化[J].地理研究,2010,29(12):2155-2165.
[4]于新淮,田晶华.略论中心城市的经济发展[J].中国工业经济,1998,16(5):59-60.
[5]孟德友,李小建,陆玉麒,等.长江三角洲地区城市经济发展水平空间格局演变[J].经济地理,2014,34(2):50-57.
[6]柴攀峰,黄中伟.基于协同发展的长三角城市群空间格局研究[J].经济地理,2014,34(6):75-79.
[7]张麟,刘光中,王纬,等.城市系统效率的差异及对我国城市化进程的影响[J].软科学,2011,15(3):65-67.
[8]Macmillan W D.The estimation and applications of multi-regional economic planning models using data envelopment analysis[J].Papers of the Regional Science Association,1986(21):60-68.
[9]Charnes A,Cooper W,Li S.Using Data Envelopment Analysis to Evaluate Efficiency in the Economic Performance of Chinese Cities[J].Socio-economic Planning Science,1989(23):325-344.
[10]李郇,徐现祥,陈浩辉.20世纪90年代中国城市效率的时空变化[J].地理学报,2005,60(4):615-625.
[11]郭腾云,徐勇,王志强.基于DEA的中国特大城市资源效率及其变化[J].地理学报,2009,64(4):408-416.
[12]张军涛,刘建国.城市效率及其溢出效应---以东北三省34个地级市为例[J].经济地理,2011,31(4):578-583.
[13]于珊珊,彭鹏,田小琴,等.基于DEA模型的湖南省资源型城市效率变化研究[J].科技和产业,2012,12(5):32-36.
[14]方创琳,关兴良.中国城市群投入产出效率的综合测度与空间分异[J].地理学报,2011,66(8):1011-1022.
[15]梁流涛,赵庆良,陈聪.中国城市土地利用效率空间分异特征及优化路径分析[J].中国土地科学,2013,27(7):48-54.
[16]潘竟虎,尹君.中国地级及以上城市发展效率差异的DEA-ESDA测度[J].经济地理,2012,32(12):54-60.
[17]张俊容,郭耀煌.评价指标与DEA有效的关系[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2004,13(6):520-523.
[18]张军涛,刘建国.城市效率及其溢出效应---以东北三省34个地级市为例[J].经济地理,2011,31(4):578-590.
[19]戴永安.中国城市化效率及其影响因素---基于随机前沿生产函数的分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2010,6(12):103-117.
[20]陈修颖,陈颖.浙江省科技资源的区域差异及其空间配置效率研究[J].地理科学,2012,32(4):418-425.
[21]金晓雨,郑军.中国城市效率与城市规模研究---基于非参数与半参数的实证[J].软科学,2015,29(3):107-110.
[22]高健.人口规模、空间溢出与城市效率关系的实证分析[J].统计与决策,2018,34(2):90-94.
[23]柯善咨,赵曜.产业结构、城市规模与中国城市生产率[J].经济研究,2014,(4):76-88.