增减挂钩项目土地复垦后耕地质量等别评价——以绥德县为例
|
摘要
本文依托绥德县吉镇镇等10个城乡建设增减挂钩项目,通过选取有效土层厚度等6个方面构建评价指标体系,应用特尔斐法确定权重,依据《农用地质量分等规程》,采用"多因素综合评价法"对该地区31.368 8 hm~2新增耕地质量等别进行评价。研究表明:省级自然等为3等或4等,省级利用等为3等、4等或5等,省级经济等为2等或3等;新增耕地国家级自然等为14等,利用等为13等或14等,国家级经济等为13等。经过对新增耕地质量评定,实现了耕地数量增加和质量提升。
Based on the increase and decrease connection projects of urban and rural construction in 10 townships and counties such as Jizhen town, Suide county, this paper constructs the evaluation index system by selecting the 6 aspects of index such as the effective soil layer thickness, and the weight determined by using the Delphi method. Based on the Farmland Quality Grading Regulations, the quality grades of 31.368 8 hm~2 new cultivated land in the area were evaluated using the multi-factor evaluation method. The results showed that the physical grade indices, the use grade indices and the economic grade indices of new cultivated land were divided in to 3 or 4 grades, 3, 4 or 5 grades, 2 or 3 grades respectively based on provincial level; The cultivated land are divided into 14 grades, the use grade indices and the economic grade indices of new 13 or 14 grades,13 grades respectively based on national level. In conclusion, not only the quality of cultivated land is increased but also the quantity is promoted through evaluating the new quality of cultivated land.
Based on the increase and decrease connection projects of urban and rural construction in 10 townships and counties such as Jizhen town, Suide county, this paper constructs the evaluation index system by selecting the 6 aspects of index such as the effective soil layer thickness, and the weight determined by using the Delphi method. Based on the Farmland Quality Grading Regulations, the quality grades of 31.368 8 hm~2 new cultivated land in the area were evaluated using the multi-factor evaluation method. The results showed that the physical grade indices, the use grade indices and the economic grade indices of new cultivated land were divided in to 3 or 4 grades, 3, 4 or 5 grades, 2 or 3 grades respectively based on provincial level; The cultivated land are divided into 14 grades, the use grade indices and the economic grade indices of new 13 or 14 grades,13 grades respectively based on national level. In conclusion, not only the quality of cultivated land is increased but also the quantity is promoted through evaluating the new quality of cultivated land.
引文
[1] 郭若成,罗溢.城乡建设用地增减挂钩助推城乡统筹发展[J].畅所欲言,2007,10(2):32-34.
[2] 郭若成,罗溢.积极开展城乡建设用地增减挂钩助推节约集约用地[J].创新思维,2008,9(2):28-30.
[3] 郝冬芳,侯志玲.沈阳市城乡建设用地增减挂钩规划必要性分析[J].民营科技,2009(10):106.
[4] 罗蕊.容县城乡建设用地增减挂钩的潜力分析[J].现代农业科技,2010(12):384-390.
[5] 马永坤.城乡建设用地增减挂钩机制的经济学分析——以成都为例[D].成都:西南财经大学,2011.
[6] 龙拥军.基于经济学视角的城乡建设用地增减挂钩困境分析[J].贵州农业科学,2011(10):209-213.
[7] 吉登艳.城乡建设用地增减挂钩的成本与效益分析[D].南昌:江西师范大学,2011.
[8] 王洋.城乡建设用地增减挂钩适宜区评价一一以河北省任丘市为例[D].保定:河北农业大学,2011.
[9] 胡祥.城乡建设用地增减挂钩安置用地指标解决对策[J].吉林农业,2010(08):53.
[10] 李梦然.本质是优化利用空间——中国农业大学教授郝晋珉谈“增减挂钩”[J].中国土地,2010(6):14-17.
[11] 中华人民共和国国土资源部.农用地质量分等规程:GB/T28407—2012[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2012.
[12] 陕西省国土资源厅.陕西省耕地质量等级成果补充完善技术方案[R].西安:陕西省国土资源厅,2011.
[2] 郭若成,罗溢.积极开展城乡建设用地增减挂钩助推节约集约用地[J].创新思维,2008,9(2):28-30.
[3] 郝冬芳,侯志玲.沈阳市城乡建设用地增减挂钩规划必要性分析[J].民营科技,2009(10):106.
[4] 罗蕊.容县城乡建设用地增减挂钩的潜力分析[J].现代农业科技,2010(12):384-390.
[5] 马永坤.城乡建设用地增减挂钩机制的经济学分析——以成都为例[D].成都:西南财经大学,2011.
[6] 龙拥军.基于经济学视角的城乡建设用地增减挂钩困境分析[J].贵州农业科学,2011(10):209-213.
[7] 吉登艳.城乡建设用地增减挂钩的成本与效益分析[D].南昌:江西师范大学,2011.
[8] 王洋.城乡建设用地增减挂钩适宜区评价一一以河北省任丘市为例[D].保定:河北农业大学,2011.
[9] 胡祥.城乡建设用地增减挂钩安置用地指标解决对策[J].吉林农业,2010(08):53.
[10] 李梦然.本质是优化利用空间——中国农业大学教授郝晋珉谈“增减挂钩”[J].中国土地,2010(6):14-17.
[11] 中华人民共和国国土资源部.农用地质量分等规程:GB/T28407—2012[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2012.
[12] 陕西省国土资源厅.陕西省耕地质量等级成果补充完善技术方案[R].西安:陕西省国土资源厅,2011.